VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal evaluated the fair rent for a property and decided on a lower rent due to several factors affecting the property's condition. The final fair rent was set at £11,550 per quarter, starting from February 1, 2024.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent assessment that reflects the property's condition and market value.

Topics

fair rent assessmentproperty condition deductions

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal assessed the fair rent for a property and determined a lower rent due to various deductions.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal assessed the fair rent for a property located at 8 Trevor Square, London, considering various deductions based on the property's condition and market value. The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £11,550 per quarter, effective from 1 February 2024.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BK/F77/2023/0407

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], London, [POSTCODE]

Tribunal Judge S.J. Walker Tribunal Member [NAME] MA MRICS

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £10, 450 Per quarter (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 1 February 2024

3. The amount for services is n/a Per

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

n/a Per

negligible/not applicable

5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £ ............................ per ................................... including £ ...................... per ................................. for services (variable).

(b) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ 13,689 ........ per quarter ....... including £ ......................................... per ................................. for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.

Chairman Tribunal Judge S.J. Walker Date of decision 1 February 2024

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 379

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 314.3

X 379 Minus Y 314.3 = (A) 64.7

(A) 64.7 Divided by Y 314.3 = (B) 0.20585

First [NAME] for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.25585

Last registered rent* £10,900 Multiplied by (C) = £13,688.77 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £13,689

Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £13,689 Per quarter

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present [NAME] was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent [NAME] since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the [NAME] of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00BK/F77/2023/0407 Property : 8, [ADDRESS], London [POSTCODE]. Tenant : Mrs. [APPELLANT].[APPELLANT]. [APPELLANT] Landlord : [APPELLANT]. Type of [NAME] : Assessment of Fair Rent Date of [NAME] : 16 November 2023 Tribunal Members : Tribunal Judge S.J. Walker Tribunal Member [NAME] MA MRICS Date of Summary Reasons : 2 February 2024

DECISION

The sum of £11,550 per quarter will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 1 February 2024, being the date the Tribunal made the decision.

SUMMARY

REASONS Background 1. Following an objection by the landlord dated 16 November 2023 to the Rent Officer’s valuation of the fair rent of the above property at £11,160 per quarter with effect from 26 November 2023, the Tribunal has made a determination. The landlord had served a notice proposing a new rent of £13,080 per calendar month in place of the existing rent of £10,900 per quarter. The tenancy commenced on 24 June 1976. A tenancy agreement was not included in the papers.

2 Inspection 2. The Tribunal carried out an inspection of the property on 1 February 2024.

Evidence 3. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by both the landlord and the tenant. Neither party provided its own comparable evidence.

Determination and Valuation 4. Having considered our own knowledge of rental values in the area as an expert Tribunal, our view is that the open market rent for the property would be £27,500 per quarter if it was in good condition.

5. To reflect the fact that the kitchen is unmodernised we have deducted 10%

6. To reflect the fact that the bathrooms are unmodernised we have deducted 10%

7. To reflect the age of the central heating and the fact that parts are not working we have deducted 5%

8. To reflect the need for repairs to substantial cracking caused by subsidence and the general condition of the property we have deducted 7.5%

9. To reflect the fact that the electricity provision is poor (there are inadequate sockets and some of the wiring is very old) we have deducted 5%

10. To reflect the fact that the landlord has not supplied white goods, carpets, curtains or furniture and the fact that the tenant has internal decorating obligations we have deducted 10%

11. This makes a total deduction of 47.5%

12. The Tribunal has also made a 20% deduction for scarcity.

13. The full valuation is shown below Market Rent

per quarter

£27,500 Less Deductions as set out above of 47.5%

£13,062.50

Sub-total

£14,437.50

Less Scarcity of approx. 20%

£2,887.50

Total

£11,550

3

Name: Tribunal Judge S.J. Walker Date: 2 February 2024

ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

• The Tribunal is required to set out rights of appeal against its decisions by virtue of the rule 36 (2)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(Property Chamber) Rules 2013 and these are set out below.

• If a party wishes to appeal against this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

• The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].

• If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.

• The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that considers improvements made by the tenant.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment based on the Retail Price Index.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent assessment that reflects market standards.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £11,550 per quarter for the property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and market value, making several deductions.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the need for repairs.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, who argued for a lower rent.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property when arguing for a fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of the property's condition and comparable rental values in the area mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent assessments.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.