VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1,100.00 for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for a property, setting it at £1,100.00 per month. They considered the property's condition and compared it to similar properties in the area.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent determination that reflects the property's condition and market comparables.

Topics

rent determinationassured tenancysection 13 Housing Act 1988

Provisions

Housing Act 1988 s.14Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for a property at £1,100.00 per month, considering the property's condition and market comparables.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for a property at £1,100.00 per month, taking into account the property's condition and market comparables. The decision was made under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HB/MNR/2022/0126

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 5 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mr R [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 50 St. [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT] & [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 1100.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 05 December 2022

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 05 July 2019

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Cooker, fridge and washing machine.

8. Description of premises 2 bedroom terrace house.

Chairman Mr R [NAME] of Decision 19 December 2022

1

Case Reference

: CHI/00HB/MNR/2022/0126

Property : 5 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

(Tenants)

Respondent: [redacted]

Management

Date of Application : 25th October 2022

Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]

: 19th December 2022

_____________________________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022

2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 19th December 2022 that the rent will be £1,100.00 per calendar month (pcm) with effect from 5th December 2022.

2. By an application dated 25th October 2022, the Tenants of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.

3. The landlord's notice dated the 14th October 2022 proposed a rent of £1,100.00 pcm with effect from 5th December 2022, in place of the current rent of £925.00 pcm.

4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The tenancy agreement is in common form and is dated 5th July 2019. The tenancy is subject to the Landlord's repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 2nd November 2022 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.

6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:

7. The property is located in an established residential area of mixed dwellings. Bristol city centre and local amenities are readily available.

8. The property comprises a mid terrace house with gas central heating and double glazing.

9. The accommodation comprises: Living Room, kitchen, small w.c. under stairs. Bathroom/w.c. and 2 bedrooms. Outside: rear garden.

10. The property is let unfurnished with floor coverings, fridge, cooker and washing machine.

11. The Tribunal assumed that all mains services are connected.

Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 12. Tribunal Directions.

13. Landlord: Tribunal Reply Form and attachment.

14. Tenant: Application Reply Forms, Notice of Increase and Tenancy Agreement.

Landlord's agents Representations (summarised):

15. The Landlord says in the Reply Form and attachments: a) Floor in hallway replaced 2022.

3

b) New washing machine 2022. c) The Tenant advised they had issues on 18th October 2022 but, despite requesting more information as at 8th November 2022, no issues had been reported. d) Kitchen and bathroom fittings are roughly 5 years old.

16. As to rental value the agent provides a Rightmove report identifying various properties within 0.5 miles of the subject property at rents between £1,095.00 and £1,400.00 pcm. The increase proposed is below others in the area.

Tenant's Representations (summarised)

17. The Tenant says in the Application and Reply Forms:

a) Rotten floor replaced in 2022. b) Washing machine replaced in 2022. c) Issues (including: external decoration, window, blocked drain, bathroom tiles loose and plaster cracks all over the house) have been reported to the agent but no work has been carried out. d) Undated photographs included: Repaired bathroom tiles, mould and plaster cracks, damaged window.

18. As to the proposed rent, the Tenants say other properties in the area may have a higher rent ‘but are houses in very good condition inside and outside, and probably without issues’.

19. A selection of properties advertised on Rightmove, Gumtree and Zoopla is presented at rents for 2 bedroom properties from £895.00 to £1,000.00 and 3 bedroom properties from £1,095.00 to £1,295.00 pcm.

The Tribunal’s Deliberations 20. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.

21. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an Assured Tenancy. The personal circumstances of the [NAME] are not relevant to this issue.

22. The Tribunal checked the National Energy Performance Register and noted that the subject property has a certificate registering the property at C and expiring on 1st July 2029. The legal minimum standard for [RESPONDENT] a property is rating E.

23. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory.

24. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market [RESPONDENT]. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own

4

general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with modern central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, cooker, washing machine and an EPC Rating of E or above would be £1,200.00 pcm.

25. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions and the apparent condition (as submitted by the parties) of the subject property determined to make deductions in respect of issues identified:

a) General disrepair (as identified by the tenant) : £100.00

26. Accordingly, the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £1,100.00 pcm.

27. The rent will take effect from 5th December 2022 being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.

Relevant Law 28. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

29. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the market rent for a modernised property in fair condition with modern facilities and a good EPC rating would be £1,200.00 per calendar month.
  • The tribunal made a deduction of £100.00 due to general disrepair identified by the tenant.
  • The tribunal found that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to its condition and inventory.
  • The landlord's notice of rent increase was a valid notice under section 13 of the Housing Act.
  • The tribunal considered the property's Energy Performance Certificate, which registered the property at C, above the legal minimum standard.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord's agent's argument that the proposed rent increase was below others in the area was not fully accepted as the tribunal made a deduction.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for the property was set at £1,100.00 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and market comparables.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and market comparables were the most important factors.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and market comparables when disputing rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of the property's condition and market comparables were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get a solicitor for cases involving rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.