VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £680.00 pcm for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for a property in Sheerness, setting it at £680.00 per month after considering the condition and recent improvements made to the property.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent based on the condition and improvements of the property.

Topics

rent determinationassured tenancyproperty condition

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market.

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.11

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, section 11 implies a covenant by the landlord to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling house, including drains, gutters, and external pipes, as well as installations for water, gas, electricity, and sanitation.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a rent of £680.00 pcm for a property in Sheerness, Kent, after considering the condition and improvements made to the property.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for a property in Sheerness, Kent, setting it at £680.00 pcm after evaluating the condition and recent improvements to the property.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/29UM/MNR/2021/0061

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 21 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]

Landlord [NAME] [RESPONDENT] [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 680.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 28 June 2021

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 28 February 2015

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Carpets & white goods.

8. Description of premises Terrace house, 2 reception room, kitchen, 2 bedrooms, bathroom and garden.

[NAME] of Decision 30 July 2021

1

Case Reference : CHI/29UM/MNR/2021/0061

Property : 21 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted] : 10th June 2021

Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: [NAME] [NAME] Mr C Davies FRICS

Date

: 30th July 2021

_____________________________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021

2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 30th July 2021 in the sum of £680.00 per calendar month.

2. By an application dated 10th June 2021, the tenant of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.

3. The landlord's notice dated the 28th May 2021 proposed a rent of £720.00 pcm. with effect from 28th June 2021, in place of the current rent of £695.00 pcm.

4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The tenancy agreement is in common form and commenced on 28th February 2015. The tenancy is subject to the Landlord's repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 29th June 2021 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.

6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties (including the previous Tribunal determination), by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:

7. The property is located in a predominantly residential area in close proximity to local shops.

8. The property comprises a double glazed terrace house with central heating.

9. The accommodation comprises: 2 reception rooms and kitchen, 2 bedrooms, bathroom and w.c. Outside: garden and street parking.

10. Carpets and curtains are included in the Tenancy.

11. The Tribunal is informed that all mains services are connected.

Hearing 12. A hearing was not requested.

Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 13. Tribunal Directions dated 29th June 2021.

14. Landlord: Tribunal Reply Form.

15. Tenant: Application Form, Notice of Increase and Reply Form.

Landlord's Representations (summarised): 16. The Landlord says in the Reply Form:

3

a) A new kitchen, bathroom, laminated flooring, carpets, curtains and boiler installed in 2016.

b) New front and back doors, some windows and roof repairs in 2021.

c) [ADDRESS] is a 2 minute walk from the town with local services and transport.

d) The proposed rental for a 2 bedroom terraced house with secluded garden is £720.00 pcm.

e) A copy of the current Gas Safety Report (dated 6th June 2020) is attached to the Reply Form together with photographs showing: CO2 and smoke alarms together with evidence of repairs carried out.

Tenant's Representations (summarised) 17. In the Application Form the tenant states:

a) She has fixed polystyrene sheets on the walls in the front and rear bedrooms to prevent damage to furniture.

18. In a series of emails sent to the Tribunal the Tenant includes photographs which show the following lack of repair:

a) Widespread damp internally.

b) Poor ventilation.

c) Poor external repair particularly to render on rear projection.

d) Poor flat roof and chimney pointing and detailing.

e) Basic kitchen, small with free standing cooker.

19. No representations are made about the level of the rent proposed by the Landlord.

The Tribunal’s Deliberations 20. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant or Landlord are not relevant to this issue.

21. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.

22. The Tribunal checked the [NAME] and noted that the subject property has a certificate registering the property at E expiring on 10th June 2028. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is Rating E.

23. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory. The subject property appears to the Tribunal to be in condition that might not immediately appeal to a prospective tenant.

4

24. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, curtains and an EPC Rating above F would be £800.00 pcm.

25. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions and the apparent condition of the subject property made the following deductions:

a) Poor external repair: £50.00 b) Internal damp: £50.00 d) Basic kitchen: £20.00

26. A total deduction of £120.00.

27. Accordingly, the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £680.00 pcm.

28. The rent will take effect from 28th June 2021 being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.

Relevant Law 29. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

30. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal [NAME] to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

5

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and improvements.
  • The tenant can challenge a proposed rent increase under relevant housing laws.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment if the property does not meet market standards.
  • The tenant can request a rent set by the Tribunal based on market conditions and property condition.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent assessment considering the property's condition, location, and current market conditions.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the rent for a property at £680.00 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the condition and improvements made to the property, setting a fair rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition and improvements to the property were the most important arguments.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition and improvements when determining rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs and reports about the property's condition were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.