Tribunal Rejects Landlord's Proposed Rent Increase
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided to set the rent for a property at £800 per month, rejecting the landlord's proposal to increase the rent to £1,000. The decision was made considering the property's condition and the current market conditions.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent based on the property's condition and market conditions.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market, considering the property's condition and current market conditions.
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, section 11 implies a covenant by the landlord to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling house, including drains, gutters, and external pipes, as well as installations for water, gas, electricity, and sanitation. Additionally, the landlord must also keep in repair and proper working order the installations for space heating and heating water.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set the rent for a property at £800 per month, rejecting the landlord's proposed increase to £1,000.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for a property at £800 per month, rejecting the landlord's proposal for a higher rent. The decision was based on the property's condition and current market conditions.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HY/MNR/2020/0082
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were Lertolwell Cottage, Latton, Swindon, Wiltshire, [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
[RESPONDENT] c/o [NAME], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 800.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 November 2020
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 1989
5. Length of the term or rental period Believed monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & [APPELLANT] 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises Detached cottage in need of repair and modernisation with Energy Performance Certificate.
[NAME] of Decision 4 January 2021
1
Case Reference : CHI/00HY/MNR/2020/0082
Property : [APPELLANT], Latton, Swindon, [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted]
[NAME] of Application : Received 27th October 2020
Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] T [NAME] Ms [NAME] D [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]
: 4th January 2021
_______________________________________________
REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 4th January 2021 the sum of £800.00 per calendar month.
2. By an application received on 27th October 2020, the [APPELLANT] of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.
3. The landlord's notice dated the 20th September 2020 proposed a rent of £1,000.00 per calendar month with effect from 1st November 2020, in place of the current rent of £710.00 per calendar month.
4. The application form states the tenancy is an assured agricultural tenancy. No tenancy agreement was provided by either of the parties and accordingly the Tribunal assumes this tenancy is subject to the Landlord's repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the Landlord and [APPELLANT] 1985.
Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 16th June 2020 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.
6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:
7. The property is located along a track some 300 metres from the main A419 dual carriageway.
8. The property comprises a detached house.
9. The accommodation comprises: Living Room, Kitchen, Bathroom, w.c, 4 Bedrooms, Office.
10. There are gardens and double garage (no doors).
11. No specific information was provided to the Tribunal with regard to the supply of utilities. In the absence of any other information the Tribunal has assumed that mains, water, electricity and drainage to be connected. It is not clear from the papers submitted whether the gas is supplied by cylinder or mains. There is oil central heating to radiators.
Hearing 12. A hearing was not requested.
Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 13. Tribunal Directions dated 16th June 2020.
14. Landlord: Tribunal Reply Form, witness statement.
15. [APPELLANT]: Application and Reply Form.
3
16. Landlord: Agent's submission and attachments.
Landlord's Representations 17. The Landlord's agent in a letter to the Tribunal (copied to the [APPELLANT]) refers to three comparables:
[ADDRESS]: 3 bedroom, 3 reception rooms detached house with off road parking at a rent of £1,200.00 per calendar month from 1st January 2020.
Forge Cottage, Cerney Wick: 4 bedrooms, village location wood burner rear garden and road frontage at rent of £1,600.00 per calendar month from 23rd September 2020.
16a Manor Cottage, just off [ADDRESS]: 3 bedroom cottage refurbished in recent years. Part of the same estate let from 24th August 2020 £1,740.00 per calendar month.
18. The agents say they have experienced a strong demand since March and the outbreak of Covid 19 for rural residential properties with outdoor space. This had led to higher increase in rental levels.
19. Work carried out to the property in recent years includes: Easy access bath 2016, replacement porch 2016, new central heating boiler 2018, draft proofing and LED lighting 2018 and repairs to basin 2018.
[APPELLANT]'s Representations 20. In the application and the Reply Form the [APPELLANT] said he had to replace the solid fuel boiler (hot water and central heating) at his own expense with an oil fired system. Further he had repaired the access road at a cost of £3,000.00 plus VAT (subsequently repaid by Landlord) but it now needs doing again.
21. The roof was repaired by the landlord but the rubble and dust resulting was allowed to fall into the bedrooms. Insulation was fitted without properly clearing away the rubble and dust.
22. The kitchen was redone with 2nd hand materials. The cooker was moved and a CORGI gas fitter advised that the gas should be shut off immediately. Re installation of the gas cooker in a safe manner was carried out at the [APPELLANT]'s expense.
23. The brook which has not been cleared for 30+ years now floods the garage.
24. The [APPELLANT] requested a walk in shower to assist his wife, but the landlord installed a walk in bath.
25. There are proposals to convert the barn adjoining the property into residential accommodation which will cause more disturbance.
4
26. The examples given by [NAME] of other similar properties bear no comparison as they are all in a good state of repair with none of the problems of the subject property. The attempt by [NAME] to increase the rent to make the property more attractive to a buyer does not reflect the state of repair nor the disruption to the tenants over the next two years.
The Tribunal’s Deliberations 27. The Tribunal may proceed to determine the rent at which it considers the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
28. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.
29. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the [APPELLANT] are not relevant to this issue.
30. The Tribunal checked the [NAME] and noted that the certificate (EPC) for the property was dated 27th March 2017 and recorded a rating of F33. The Tribunal notes that some work has been carried since the EPC which affect the rating. This property is below the legal minimum standard (Rating E) for offering a property to let on the open market. The Tribunal considers that a rating of this level is so low it would have an adverse effect on the rent achievable.
31. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory. In this case, if offered today in the market, the property would require extensive enhancement and an upgraded inventory to include white goods, floor coverings and a much higher EPC rating.
32. The Tribunal considered the comparable evidence supplied by the agent and noted the limited analysis and comparison to the subject property and accordingly treated such evidence with caution.
33. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions, determined that the market rent for the subject property is £800.00 per calendar month.
34. The rent will take effect from 1st November 2020 being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.
Relevant Law 35. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
36. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)
[NAME]
5
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for HMO Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Proposed Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Birmingham Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent of £1500 PCM for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for New Flat in High Wycombe
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent based on both the property's condition and market conditions.
- The decision includes consideration of current market conditions alongside the property's condition.
- The case emphasizes the importance of the property being in good condition for determining fair rent.
- The outcome is allowed when the holding mentions both the condition of the property and market value.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The case is dismissed when the focus is solely on market conditions without emphasizing the property's condition.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the rent for the property at £800 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and current market conditions.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property and the current market conditions were the most important arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also challenge a proposed rent increase based on the property's condition and market conditions.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Information about the property's condition and comparable rents were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
