First-tier Tribunal Appoints New Manager for Property Due to Disrepair
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided to appoint a new manager for a property because the current landlord was not managing and maintaining the property properly. The decision was based on the landlord's failure to address disrepair and provide adequate services.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord must appoint a manager if the property is not being adequately managed and maintained.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, a tribunal can appoint a manager to handle the management of certain premises when specific conditions are met. These conditions include situations where a landlord breaches obligations related to managing the property, makes unreasonable service charges, fails to comply with approved codes of practice, or when other circumstances justify the appointment.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal appointed a new manager for the property under section 24 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal granted the application for the appointment of a new manager for the property under section 24 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, due to the landlord's failure to manage and maintain the property adequately.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AN/LAM/2020/0002 HMCTS code (paper, video, audio)
V: CVPREMOTE (Video Hearing) Property : [NAME], 31 BULWER STREET, LONDON, [POSTCODE] Applicants : [redacted] [NAME] ([NAME]) (2) [NAME] ([NAME]) (3) [NAME] (Flat 4) (4) [NAME] (Flat 5) (5) [NAME] (Flat 6) (6) [NAME] (Flat 7) Representative : Mr [COUNSEL] [NAME] Respondents : [redacted] [NAME] (2) [NAME] :
Type of [NAME] : Appointment of Manager, section 24(1) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 Tribunal members : JUDGE [NAME] : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 20th October 2020
DECISION
Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing This has been a remote (video) hearing which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was V: CVPREMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held
2 because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined in a remote hearing, by video. The documents to which the Tribunal was referred were in a bundle of 135 pages, the contents of which have noted. The order made is described at the end of these reasons. Decision of the tribunal 1. In accordance with section 24(1) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME] of [COMPANY] (‘the Manager’) is appointed as manager of the property at LYTTON HOUSE, 31 BULWER STREET, LONDON [POSTCODE] ("the Property’).
2. The order shall continue for a period of 3 (THREE) years from 29th OCTOBER 2020. [NAME] for an extension must be made prior to the expiry of that period. If such an [NAME] is made in time, then the appointment will continue until that [NAME] has been finally determined.
3. The Manager shall manage the Property in accordance with: (a) The directions and schedule of functions and services attached to this order; (b) The respective obligations of the landlord and the leases by which the flats at the Property are demised by the Respondent and in particular with regard to repair, decoration, provision of services and insurance of the Property; and (c) The duties of a manager set out in the Service Charge Residential Management Code (‘the Code’) or such other replacement code published by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and approved by the Secretary of State pursuant to section 87 Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.
4. The Manager shall register the order against the landlord’s registered title as a restriction under the Land Registration Act 2002, or any subsequent Act.
5. An order shall be made under section 20C Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 that the Respondent’s costs before the Tribunal shall not be added to the service charges
Tribunal’s Reasons for Decision
1. This [NAME] was received by the Tribunal on 21st January 2020. It is an [NAME] for the appointment of a Manager of the property, pursuant to section 24 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. Directions were given in the matter by the Tribunal on 25th February at an oral hearing attended by the applicants (with exception of [NAME] [RESPONDENT]), and the first-named Respondent (who attended with a [RESPONDENT]). The parties were required, in the usual
3 way to serve Statements of Case. The Respondents failed to serve their Statement of Case by 31st March 2020, as stipulated, and in Amended Directions dated 26th August, it was provided that: “Before they can take any part in the proceedings, they must write to the tribunal explaining their non- compliance.” They failed also to comply with that Direction.
2. A hearing of the [NAME] took place on 15th October, attended by Mr [NAME], Mr [NAME], Mr [NAME], and the proposed manager, [NAME] [NAME] attended for the Applicants. The Respondents failed to attend. The brief history of the matter set out below emanates from the Applicants, both in the form of the helpful written statements submitted by all of them, and the documents in the hearing bundle. So far as can be ascertained, the Respondents have played no part in the proceedings, save for the attendance at the first Directions Hearing mentioned above.
3. The 6 Applicants in this case are [NAME] of 5 of the flats at the property. The property is a late Victorian purpose built block of 8 flats. The remaining 3 flats are owned on long leases by the first-named Respondent (hereinafter “Mr [RESPONDENT]”), who, together with his former partner (the second-named Respondent) also owns the freehold of the property. The Tribunal was informed that the Respondents have now separated, and [NAME] [NAME] no longer has any involvement with the Property, although she remains a joint registered owner of the freehold.
2. Until 2015, the property was satisfactorily managed by [NAME]. In that year, for reasons unexplained, and without reference to any of the [NAME], Mr [NAME] dismissed the [NAME], and assumed management of the property himself. The assumption of responsibility seems to have been conceptual only, because on the account of all of the Applicants, Mr [NAME] has done little or nothing to maintain the property ever since. The result has been that, over the past 5 years, the condition of the property has thoroughly deteriorated and there are now multiple aspects of disrepair, some of them requiring urgent attention. In addition, and worryingly, despite repeated requests, the [NAME] have not been provided with a sight of the current insurance certificate, and there are therefore concerns as to whether the property is properly insured.
4. The precise details of the breaches of covenant and other omissions by the [NAME], have been well-tabulated in the section 22 Notice, as appearing at pages 1-8 of the bundle. No purpose would be served by repeating the whole of that material in this Decision, but, by way of example, there has been repeated water penetration through a chimney and outside wall, which has continued for more than 3 years. Flats 5 and 7 have been particularly affected, and Mr [NAME], the owner of flat 7, in frustration at the lack of action by Mr [NAME], commissioned (and paid for) a report by Mr [NAME], who inspected on 9th April 2019, and reported on 16th April. He identified the work which was required in a Schedule which appears at pages 95/96 of the bundle. Despite meeting with Mr [NAME] at the property and being supplied with a copy of the report, Schedule and photographs in the bundle, Mr [NAME] did nothing to remedy the disrepair – and the leakages continue to date.
4 5. The internal common parts are shabby and poorly maintained, there is cracking in the front elevation, and in the balcony wall of Flat 5, the window frames are rotting, and no external decoration or maintenance has taken place since 2005. There is a fuse-box in the communal hallway, with only masking tape around individual fuses, and no fireproof enclosure. The Applicants are not aware of any recent fire risk assessment, or maintenance of fire extinguishers.
6. There are numerous breaches of the RICS Management Code. Mr [NAME] has failed to send out service charge or ground rent demands since 2015. He does not respond to communications from the [NAME], and letters sent (even by recorded delivery) are returned unopened.
7.¶ In some respects there is concern about Mr [NAME], who may not be in good health. The Tribunal was informed that, although he owns the freehold and 3 flats at the property (which are let) he resides in the basement area of the property. This is not an authorised residential unit, is not properly equipped for accommodation, and may present a Health and Safety Hazard.
8. The Tribunal heard nothing from the Respondents, and no documents were submitted on their behalf. The Tribunal heard evidence from each of the Applicants attending, and read the statements of those not in attendance – together with the hearing bundle prepared by the Applicants. The Tribunal found each of the Applicants completely persuasive (indeed restrained) in their evidence, and has no hesitation in accepting their evidence.
9. The Tribunal is satisfied that the Applicants have made out their case, and that a Manager should be appointed. The Tribunal is satisfied on the evidence referred to above that there have been breaches of section 24(2)(a), (ac), and (b) of the Act. The Tribunal considers that it is just and convenient under each of these grounds to make an order, specifically because of the various breaches mentioned, and also generally, given the complete disengagement by Mr [NAME] from management of the property.
10. The Manager proposed by the Applicants was [NAME] [NAME], a Director of [COMPANY] In a sense, [NAME] [NAME] comes with the best possible recommendation, because Mr [NAME], the joint owner of [NAME] is an experienced local estate agent, who gave the Tribunal the impression that he had not always had outstandingly good experience with property managers. He nonetheless described [NAME] [NAME] (whose services he uses for clients) as “Efficient, knowledgeable, practical and reasonably priced.” He said that he had had “very positive feedback” from his clients in respect of her work.
11. The Tribunal interviewed the proposed manager at some length. [NAME] has been trading for only 6 years, she has long experience in the construction industry. The company is IRPM registered, and she has a particular expertise, as a member of the Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. The company has proper Indemnity Insurance (£1,000,000) and maintains separate bank accounts for each property it manages. The company has 45 different properties with which she is involved in West London, some of them very large properties (one a development of 180 flats). Her offices are very
5 local and she has a tried and tested list of local contractors whose work she trusts. Quite apart from Mr [NAME] recommendation, the Tribunal independently found [NAME] [NAME] impressive, and although she has not had Tribunal appointments before, the Tribunal was satisfied that she is a suitable person to be appointed as Manager, on the terms, and in accordance with the Decision of the Tribunal, as set out above.
Name: JUDGE SHAW Date: 20th OCTOBER 2020
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
6 DIRECTIONS
1. From the date of the appointment and throughout the appointment the Manager shall ensure that she has appropriate professional indemnity cover in the sum of at least £1,000,000 and shall provide copies of the current cover note upon a request being made by any lessee of the Property, the Respondents or the Tribunal.
2. No later than 14 days after the date of this order, the parties to this [NAME] shall provide all necessary information to and arrange with the Manager an orderly transfer of responsibilities. No later than this date, the Applicants and the Respondents shall transfer to the Manager all the accounts, books, records and funds (including, without limitation, any service charge reserve fund).
3. The rights and liabilities of the Respondents arising under any contracts of insurance, and/or any contract for the provision of any services to the Property shall upon 29th October 2020 become rights and liabilities of the Manager.
4. The Manager shall account forthwith to the Respondents for the payment of ground rent received by her and shall apply the remaining amounts received by her (other than those representing her fees) in the performance of the Respondents’ covenants contained in the said leases.
5. The Manager shall be entitled to remuneration (which for the avoidance of doubt shall be recoverable as part of the service charges of leases of the Property) in accordance with the Schedule of Functions and Services attached.
6. By no later than one year from the date of this order, the Manager shall prepare and submit a brief written report for the Tribunal on the progress of the management of the property up to that date, providing a copy to the lessees of the Property and the Respondents at the same time.
7. Within 28 days of the conclusion of the management order, the Manager shall prepare and submit a brief written report for the Tribunal, on the progress and outcome of the management of the property up to that date, to include final closing accounts. The Manager shall also serve copies of the report and accounts on the lessor and lessees, who may raise queries on them within 14 days of the date of the report. The Manager shall answer such queries within a further 14 days of the date of request. Thereafter, the Manager shall reimburse any unexpended monies to the paying parties or, if it be the case, to any new tribunal-appointed manager, or, in the case of dispute, as decided by the Tribunal upon [NAME] by any interested party.
8. The Manager shall be entitled to apply to the Tribunal for further directions.
7
SCHEDULE OF FUNCTIONS AND SERVICES
Insurance (i) Maintain appropriate building insurance for the Property. (ii) Ensure that the Manager’s interest is noted on the insurance policy.
Service charge (i) Prepare an annual service charge budget, administer the service charge and prepare and distribute appropriate service charge accounts to the lessees. (ii) Demand and collect ground rents, service charges (including contributions to a sinking fund), insurance premiums and any other payment, falling due after the date of commencement of this order, due from the lessees. (iii) Demand and collect her own service charge payable by the Respondents (as if they were a lessee), in respect of any un-leased premises in the Property which are retained by the Respondents. (iv) Instruct solicitors to recover unpaid rents and service charges and any other monies, falling due after the date of commencement of this order, to the Respondents. (v) Place, supervise and administer contracts and check demands for payment of goods, services and equipment supplied for the benefit of the Property with the service charge budget.
Accounts (i) Prepare and submit to the Respondents and lessees an annual statement of account detailing all monies received and expended. The accounts to be certified by an external auditor, if required by the Manager. (ii) Maintain efficient records and books of account which are open for inspection by the lessor and lessees. Upon request, produce for inspection, receipts or other evidence of expenditure. (iii) Maintain on trust an interest-bearing account/s at such bank or building society as the Manager shall from time to time decide, into which ground rent, service charge contributions and all other monies arising under the leases shall be paid. (iv) All monies collected will be accounted for in accordance with the accounts regulations as issued by the Royal Institution for Chartered Surveyors.
Maintenance (i) Deal with routine repair and maintenance issues and instruct contractors to attend and rectify problems. Deal with all building maintenance relating to the services and structure of the Property.
8 (ii) Consider works to be carried out to the Property in the interest of good estate management and make the appropriate recommendations to the Respondents and the lessees. (iii) Set up a planned maintenance programme to allow for the periodic re- decoration and repair of the exterior and interior common parts of the Property.
Fees
These will be in accordance the documents headed Basic Terms and Specific Terms, used by [COMPANY], attached to this Decision and Order, and appearing at pages 106-117 of the aforesaid hearing bundle, supplemented in so far as may be necessary by the following provisions: (i) Fees for the abovementioned management services will be a basic fee of £300 per annum per flat. Those services to include the services set out in the Service Charge Residential Management Code published by the RICS. (ii) Major works carried out to the Property (where it is necessary to prepare a specification of works, obtain competitive tenders, serve relevant notices on lessees and supervising the works) will be subject to a charge of 2% of the cost (subject to a maximum fee of £600). This in respect of the professional fees of an architect, surveyor, or other appropriate person in the administration of a contract for such works for which additional professional fees will be payable. Where the manager undertakes project management services directly a fee of 10% of the cost of the works will be payable. (iii) An additional charge, (subject to a maximum of £250) for dealing with solicitors’ enquiries on transfer will be made on a time related basis payable by the outgoing lessee. (iv) VAT is to be payable on all the fees quoted above, where appropriate, at the rate prevailing on the date of invoicing. (v) The preparation of insurance valuations and the undertaking of other tasks which fall outside those duties described above are to be charged for at the Manager’s usual hourly rate, and on a time spent basis or at appropriate rates payable to separately appointed external professional consultants.
Complaints procedure The Manager shall operate a complaints procedure in accordance with, or substantially similar to, the requirements of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Appoints External Manager for Disputed Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) New Manager Appointed for Property Due to Lease Failures
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Appoints Manager to Oversee Property Management
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Manager Appointed to Oversee Property Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Premium for New Lease Under 1993 Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Lease Premium at £427,480
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Appoints Manager for Property Management
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Lease Premium at £21,790
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Orders Appointment of Property Manager
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Lease Premium Amid Onerous Ground Rent Revie…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenants Win Partial Rent Refund for Living in Unlicensed HMO
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Ordered to Repay Rent Due to Lack of Mandatory License
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord fails to adequately manage and maintain the property.
- The Tribunal can appoint a manager to oversee the management of the property.
- The landlord must comply with relevant legislation and codes of practice.
- Leaseholders cannot manage the property effectively due to disputes.
- The landlord must comply with lease obligations and statutory requirements.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided to appoint a new manager for the property.
Who was involved?
Leaseholders of the property and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the evidence presented by the leaseholders showing the landlord's failure to manage the property properly.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, specifically section 24, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the evidence showing the property was not being adequately managed and maintained.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation might consider applying for the appointment of a new manager if the landlord is not managing the property properly.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of disrepair, lack of maintenance, and failure to provide services mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
