VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Approves £18,174 for Reasonable Service Charges

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal approved a cost of £18,174 for external redecoration and repairs, stating that it is reasonable under the lease terms and following a proper consultation process.

⚖️ Legal holding

The costs of external redecoration and repairs are reasonable if incurred through a proper consultation process and are of a reasonable standard.

Topics

service chargeslease obligationsconsultation process

Provisions

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.19Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.20

📖 What the law says

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.19

The costs considered for a service charge must be reasonably incurred and, if they involve providing services or carrying out works, these must be of a reasonable standard.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal determined that the cost of £18,174 for external redecoration and repairs is reasonable under the lease terms.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined that the cost of £18,174 for external redecoration and repairs is reasonable under the lease terms, provided the works are carried out to a reasonable standard.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference

:

CHI/00HN/LIS/2019/0047

Property

:

[ADDRESS], 12 Owls road, Bournemouth [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

:

[APPELLANT]

Respondent: [redacted]

:

Type of Application

:

Determination of reasonableness of service charges

Tribunal Member(s)

:

[NAME] of Decision

:

12 September 2019

DECISION

The Tribunal determines that the sum of £18,174, being the amount referred to in the application may, subject to the works being carried out to a reasonable standard, be recovered from the [NAME] in accordance with the terms of their respective leases

2

Background

1. The Applicant seeks a determination that the costs of £18,174.00 it intends to expend in respect of external redecorations and repairs which have been subject to a section 20 consultation are reasonable.

2. The Tribunal made Directions on 23 July 2019 which were sent to the [NAME]. Attached to the Directions was a form for the [NAME] to return to the Tribunal indicating whether they agreed with the Application and that those who did agree or failed to respond would be removed as Respondents.

3. One response was received agreeing to the application and they, together with those [NAME] who did not respond are therefore removed as Respondents.

4. On 15 August 2019 the Tribunal indicated that it would determine the application on the papers under Rule 31 of the Tribunal’s procedural rules unless any party objected within 28 days.

5. No objections have been received and the matter is therefore determined on the papers already received. on the first available date after the expiry of 28 days from the date of these Directions.

The Lease

6. The lease for Flat 2 has been provided and it understood that all leases are in similar form. The Fourth Schedule contains the [NAME] covenants under which they are to repair, decorate and renew the main structure including internal staircases and landings.

7. Clause 13(a) of The Third Schedule contains the obligation of the [NAME] to “ contribute and pay on demand by way of further and additional rent one ninth share of the costs ….referred to in clauses one to three inclusive of the Fourth Schedule”

The Law

8. The tribunal has power under section 27A of the Act to decide about all aspects of liability to pay service charges and can interpret the lease where necessary to resolve disputes or uncertainties. The tribunal can decide by whom, to whom, how much and when a service charge is payable.

3 9. By section 19 of the Act a service charge is only payable to the extent that it has been reasonably incurred and if the services or works for which the service charge is claimed are of a reasonable standard. Section 19 (2) concerns where a service charge is payable before the relevant costs are incurred no greater amount than is reasonable is payable.

The Submission

10. The bundle contains; • A specification of works prepared by Winkle-Bottom Chartered Surveyors for external decorations • A Notice of Intention dated 15 November 2017 • A tender report containing three contractors’ quotations • A statement of estimates and accompanying notice dated 12 February 2018 indicating a cost of £18,174. • Correspondence regarding an increase in the lowest tenderer’s estimate.

Discussion and Determination

11. I am satisfied that the Lease requires the [NAME] to carry out the proposed works at the [NAME]’ cost by way of service charge.

12. The works have been the subject of a tendering process and the lowest price proposed.

13. No challenge has been received to the consultation procedures required by Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 or to the application as a whole.

14. In these circumstances the Tribunal determines that sum of £18,174 being the amount referred to in the application may, subject to the works being carried out to a reasonable standard, be recovered from the [NAME] in accordance with the terms of their respective leases.

D [NAME]

12 September 2019

Appeals

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

4 2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Service charges are considered reasonable if they align with the lease agreement.
  • Tenants are entitled to have service charges determined as reasonable under specific acts.
  • Costs for external redecoration and repairs are deemed reasonable if they follow a proper consultation process.
  • Tenants can have service charges reduced if the costs are not reasonably incurred or the work standard is unreasonable.
  • Landlords can be exempted from consultation requirements if urgent repairs are necessary and there is no identified prejudice to tenants.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No significant factors leading against the claimant were found in the provided cases.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided that the cost of £18,174 for external redecoration and repairs is reasonable under the lease terms.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a property owner and tenants.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided that the cost is reasonable because it followed a proper consultation process and the work is of a reasonable standard.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 sections 19 and 20 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that the consultation process was conducted properly and the cost was reasonable.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure that their consultation process is thorough and that the cost is reasonable according to their lease terms.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence such as a specification of works, tender reports, and correspondence regarding the estimate mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving lease terms and service charges.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.