First-tier Tribunal Approves Lease Variation for Service Charges
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal approved a request to change lease agreements to allow for a single approach to service charges and to update the lease terms. This decision was supported by all parties involved.
⚖️ Legal holding
Under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, section 37 allows for the variation of leases if it is in the interest of justice and all parties consent.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, an application can be made to a tribunal to vary leases if certain conditions are met. These include that the leases must be long leases of flats under the same landlord, though not necessarily in the same building or with identical terms. The application must be supported by all parties involved if it concerns less than nine leases, or by at least 75% of the parties if it involves more than eight leases, with no more than 10% opposing it.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The First-tier Tribunal granted an application to vary leases to allow for a unified approach to service charges and modernise the lease terms.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal granted an application to vary leases to allow for a unified approach to service charges and modernise the lease terms. The decision was based on unanimous support from all interested parties and the requirement that the variation be in the interest of justice.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference
:
CHI/45UH/LVT/2020/0005 & 0006
Property
:
[ADDRESS], [ADDRESS], Goring-by-Sea, Worthing
Applicant: [redacted] Limited and the long lessees
Representative
:
[COUNSEL] [RESPONDENT]
Respondent: [redacted]
(1) [COMPANY] (2) [RESPONDENT]
:
Type of Application
:
Landlord & Tenant Act 1987 Section 37 Variation of a lease
Tribunal Member(s)
:
Judge D. R. Whitney
Date of Determination
:
22nd January 2021
DETERMINATION
Background
2 1. The Applicant, [ADDRESS] Association Limited manages the Property, [ADDRESS], Worthing.
2. The Property consists of an estate made up of 6 blocks of flats with 48 flats in total. All 48 leaseholders joined in with making the application.
3. The two companies named as Respondents are the freeholders of [ADDRESS]. A separate application was made in respect of each separate freehold.
4. Directions were issued in respect of both claims on 4th December 2021. These directions provided that both claims would be consolidated and dealt with together. The Applicant’s solicitors have provided two electronic bundles. The bundles are in similar form and references in [] are to pages within the bundle of case CHI/45UH/LVT/2020/0005. In reaching its determination the Tribunal considered both bundles.
The Law
5. The relevant law is set out in section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 (“the Act”) a copy of which is annexed hereto marked A.
Determination
6. The directions provided that the matter was to be determined on paper. The Tribunal notes that no parties have objected to such determination. I did consider the bundle and I am satisfied that this case remains suitable for determination on the papers in accordance with the Tribunal rules.
7. The Application [1-12] sets out what is sought. The [COMPANY] manages the development as a whole. The [NAME] each own part of the freehold. The Application contains a full list of all 48 leaseholders and the freeholders [15-20].
8. Within the bundle are copy sample leases and deeds of variation for each of the 6 blocks within the estate. The Applicant confirms that all of the leases are substantially in the same form. The Applicant seeks to vary the leases to give effect to the method in practice adopted for dealing with service charges and to modernise the lease.
9. As drafted each block should pay for its own repairs and maintenance. In practice the [COMPANY] has dealt with the estate as one, with each flat contributing equally to the costs. I am told this has been the practice for many years.
10. Within the bundle are copies of consents from all 50 interested parties (48 leaseholders and two freeholders) other than the [COMPANY] [178-228]. It is confirmed within the Application that the
3 [COMPANY] itself consents to the proposed variation. In accordance with the directions the [COMPANY] served copies of the Application and the directions upon all parties and no objections have been received.
11. I am satisfied that the application to vary the leases is unanimously supported by all interested parties. I am satisfied that the qualifying requirements of section 37 of the Act are met.
12. Further I am satisfied that the object to be achieved by the variation requires all leases to be varied. I am satisfied that it is in the interests of justice to vary the leases in the way sought.
13. I confirm that I make order in the terms attached marked Annex B.
Annex A
Section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987
Application by majority of parties for variation of leases.
(1)Subject to the following provisions of this section, an application may be made to the appropriate tribunal in respect of two or more leases for an order varying each of those leases in such manner as is specified in the application.
(2)Those leases must be long leases of flats under which the landlord is the same person, but they need not be leases of flats which are in the same building, nor leases which are drafted in identical terms.
(3)The grounds on which an application may be made under this section are that the object to be achieved by the variation cannot be satisfactorily achieved unless all the leases are varied to the same effect.
(4)An application under this section in respect of any leases may be made by the landlord or any of the tenants under the leases.
(5)Any such application shall only be made if—
(a)in a case where the application is in respect of less than nine leases, all, or all but one, of the parties concerned consent to it; or
(b)in a case where the application is in respect of more than eight leases, it is not opposed for any reason by more than 10 per cent. of the total number of the parties concerned and at least 75 per cent. of that number consent to it.
(6)For the purposes of subsection (5)—
(a)in the case of each lease in respect of which the application is made, the tenant under the lease shall constitute one of the parties concerned (so that in determining the total number of the parties concerned a person who is the
4 tenant under a number of such leases shall be regarded as constituting a corresponding number of the parties concerned); and
(b)the landlord shall also constitute one of the parties concerned.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Landlord Permission for Urgent Drainage Work Due…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Allowed to Repair Roof Without Consulting Tenants
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Emergency Call System Upgrade Dispensation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation from Consulting Leaseholders About Lift Repai…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Varies Leases to Reflect Modern Building Changes
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Management Order Ends With Freehold Transfer
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Premium for Collective Enfranchisement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Landlord Permission for Urgent Repairs Without L…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Emergency Repairs Approved Without Full Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Retroactive Permission for Urgent Roof Maintenance
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- All 48 leaseholders joined the application, showing widespread support for the lease variation.
- The proposed variation would formalize the existing practice of managing the estate as a single entity for service charges.
- All 50 interested parties, including the leaseholders and freeholders, consented to the proposed lease variation.
- The Tribunal was satisfied that the variation was necessary to achieve its objective and was in the interests of justice.
- No parties objected to the determination being made on paper, which satisfied the Tribunal rules.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided to grant the application to vary the leases to allow for a unified approach to service charges and to modernise the lease terms.
Who was involved?
The application was made by the residents association managing the property and the long lessees, while the freeholders of the property were the respondents.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant the application because it was unanimously supported by all interested parties and it was in the interest of justice.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, specifically section 37, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the variation of the leases was necessary to achieve the desired method of dealing with service charges and to modernise the lease terms.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation might be able to vary their leases if they can show that it is in the interest of justice and all parties consent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Copies of sample leases, deeds of variation, and consents from all interested parties were submitted.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving lease variations.
