First-tier Tribunal Approves Lease Variations Under Landlord and Tenant Act 1987
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal approved changes to 67 leases under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, provided that at least 75% of the tenants agreed with the modifications.
⚖️ Legal holding
Under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, a landlord can vary lease terms if supported by at least 75% of the tenants.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, an application can be made to a tribunal to vary leases if supported by at least 75% of the tenants involved. The application can be made by the landlord or any of the tenants, and it applies to long leases of flats where the landlord is the same person. The application must be supported by all or nearly all parties if it involves less than nine leases, or by at least 75% of the parties if it involves more than eight leases.
This section allows a tribunal to make an order varying leases if the grounds for the application are established to the satisfaction of the tribunal. The tribunal can make orders varying leases if the application is made under section 37 and the grounds set out in that section are established with respect to the leases specified in the application.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal varied several clauses in 67 leases under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal approved the variation of 67 leases under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, ensuring at least 75% of the tenants supported the changes.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference : MAN/00DA/LVT/2021/0001
Property : [ADDRESS], 46-52 (even) [NAME] [POSTCODE]
Applicants : [redacted] Represented by : [RESPONDENT]
Respondent: [redacted] Landlord & tenant Act 1987 Section 37
Tribunal Members : : Mr [APPELLANT]; Mr [NAME] of Decision : 21 March 2023
_______________________________________________
DECISION AND REASONS ____________________________________
DECISION 1. The Tribunal orders that the leases listed in Annex A column 1 hereto, held by the leaseholders listed in Annex A column 2 hereto are varied in accordance with the Order attached to this Decision and Reasons.
2. In every case, the Land Registry shall be notified of this Order by the Applicant. Pursuant to section 38(9) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, the Chief Land Registrar shall make such entries on the registers of the titles affected for the
purpose of recording and giving effect to the terms of this Order so that the variations are recorded in the registered leasehold titles of each of the underleases.
REASONS 3. This is an application under section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 to vary several clauses in 67 leases to 67 flats in three separate buildings in the development known as [ADDRESS], 46 – 52 (even) [NAME], Leeds [POSTCODE] (“the property”).
4. The Application is made by the landlord and freehold owner of the property and is supported by 52 leaseholders (originally 51 but at the hearing we were told that one of the respondents ([NAME]) actually supports the application). That represents 78% of the tenants at the property. The list of Applicants (not including Mrs [NAME]) is attached as Annex B to this Decision and Reasons. Compliance with Section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 5. Notice of the application has been served on the leaseholders and any interested parties, including the mortgagees listed in the “Schedule of Lenders” attached to the statement of case as Annex I and the Tribunal has received no objections from any of the respondents or interested parties.
6. The Tribunal is accordingly satisfied of the following requirements under section 37 of the 1987 Act namely: a. All the leases sought to be varied are long leases of flats in the property and of which the landlord is the same person. b. The object to be achieved by the variation application cannot be satisfactorily achieved unless all the leases are varied to the same effect. c. At least 75% of the effected leases consent to the application.
7. The Tribunal is also satisfied under section 38 of the 1987 Act as to the following factors: a. No respondent to the application nor any other interested party is likely to be substantially prejudiced by any variation sought; and b. there is no other reason which it would not be reasonable in the circumstances for the variation to be effected.
8. There is no claim for, and it appears to the Tribunal that there is no loss or disadvantage that any person is likely to suffer as a result of the variation and accordingly the Tribunal considers that there is no requirement to pay compensation to any person pursuant to section 38(10) of the 1987 Act.
9. Within 21 days of this decision the Applicant shall file stamped addressed envelopes addressed to each leaseholder, (all 67), to enable the Tribunal to serve a copy of this Decision and Reasons on the leaseholders (as required following the Upper Tribunal decision in Hyslop v 38/41 [COMPANY] [2017] UKUT 0398 (LC)).
10. If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on a point of law only. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this decision (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rule 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
Signed……… ………..[NAME] Judge of the First-tier Tribunal
Date: 21 March 2023
Case reference: MAN/ooDA/LVT/2021/0001 IN THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPETRY)
[ADDRESS], 46-52 (even numbers) [NAME], Leeds, [POSTCODE] Section 37 – Landlord & Tenant Act 1987 Application
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED THAT PERSUANT TO S37 LTA 1987 THE LEASES SPECIFIED IN THE SCHEDULE TO THIS ORDER SHALL BE VARIED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Clause 6(a) of the Lease shall be deleted and replaced by the following clause:
“That if the rent and Maintenance Expenses hereby reserved or any part thereof shall be unpaid for thirty days next after the same shall have become due (whether the same shall have been lawfully demanded or not) or if any covenant by [NAME] or condition herein contained shall not be performed or observed by [NAME] then and in any such case it shall be lawful for [NAME] or any person or persons authorised by it in that behalf or the Management Company at any time thereafter to re-enter the Demised Premises or any part thereof in the name of the whole and thereupon this demise shall absolutely determine but without prejudice to the right of action of [NAME] in respect of any antecedent breach or non-observance by [NAME] of the covenants or conditions herein contained PROVIDED THAT [NAME] shall not exercise [NAME]’ s right of re-entry under this sub-clause without first giving no less than twenty-eight days written notice of [NAME]’ s intention so to do to any subsisting mortgagees of the Demised Premises (whose interest has been notified to [NAME] in writing prior to the breach) specifying the nature of the breach”
2. Clause 7 of the Lease shall be deleted and replaced by the following clause:
“[NAME] and [NAME] to the Registrar for the entry on the Register of the following restriction on the title to the Demised Premises:
No transfer or assignment of the registered estate is to be registered without a written certificate signed by the proprietor for the time being of the estate registered under title number WYK447376 or their conveyancer that the provisions of clause 19 in Part 2 of The Eighth Schedule of the Lease have been complied with or do not apply to the disposition.”
3. The Second Schedule of the Lease shall be deleted and replaced by the following clause:
Case reference: MAN/ooDA/LVT/2021/0001
“FIRST the Accessways SECONDLY the Parking Spaces THIRDLY any landscaped and planted areas comprised in the Development FOURTHLY refuse collection areas FIFTHLY the entrance halls passages landings staircases and other parts of the Buildings which are used in common by the owners or occupiers of any two or more of the flats and the glass in the windows of such common parts SIXTHLY the lifts lift shafts and all ancillary machinery and apparatus for operating the same SEVENTHLY the structural parts of the Buildings including but not by way of limitation the roofs gutters rainwater pipes foundations cellars floors all walls bounding individual flats therein including window frames French door frames and all external parts of the Buildings and Balconies and all Service Installations not used solely for the purpose of any individual flat but not including the glass in the windows or French doors (which shall be [NAME]’s responsibility) of the individual flats the interior joinery plasterwork tiling and other surfaces of walls the floors down to the upper side of the joists slabs or beams supporting the same and the ceilings up to the underside of the joists slabs or beams to which the same are affixed of the flats and Service Installations which exclusively serve individual flats or the exterior doors (from the corridor) of the flats except the external surface of them.”
4. Paragraph 2 of The Fifth Schedule shall be deleted and replaced by the following paragraph:
“Such rights of access to and entry upon the Demised Premises by [NAME] and its lessees and tenants are as necessary for the proper performance of its or their obligations hereunder or under covenants relating to other parts of the Development for the repair decoration maintenance improvement or inspection of other parts of the Development and for any other purpose mentioned in or connected with this Lease, the rights under this Schedule or [NAME]’ s interest in the Development or any neighbouring land.”
5. A new paragraph 5 shall be added to The Fifth Schedule:
“The right to re-route and replace any Service Installations in or on or over those parts of the Development not include in the Demised Premises”
6. (a) A new paragraph 11 of The Sixth Schedule shall be added:
“Cleaning as necessary of the external faces of the windows of the [COMPANY].”
(b) Paragraph 7 of the Sixth Schedule Part “A” shall be deleted and replaced by the following paragraph:
“Cleaning as necessary the internal faces of the windows in the common parts of the Maintained Property.”
7. Paragraph 9 of The Sixth Schedule Part “B” shall be deleted and replaced by the following paragraph:
“Employing a qualified accountant for the purpose of preparing and certifying the accounts in respect of the Maintenance Expenses and certifying the total amount thereof for the period to which the account relates.”
Case reference: MAN/ooDA/LVT/2021/0001
8. A new paragraph 17 shall be added to The Sixth Schedule Part “ B”:
“Services provided by the Management Company covered by the Maintenance Expenses including (but not limited to) the costs of dealing with any claim in the First-Tier Tribunal or Upper Tribunal (or any successor Court or Tribunal), the costs of obtaining insurance valuations and paying Insurance Premium Tax.”
9. Paragraph 2 of The Seventh Schedule shall be deleted and replaced by the following paragraph:
“If any cost is omitted from the calculation of the Maintenance Expenses in any year, the Management Company shall be entitled to include it in the estimate and certificate of the Maintenance Expenses in any following year. Otherwise, and except in the case of manifest error, the certification of the accountant referred to in paragraph 9 of Part “B” of the Sixth Schedule hereto shall (subject as hereinafter mentioned) be binding on the Management Company and [NAME].”
10. Paragraph 3 of The Eighth Schedule shall be deleted and replaced by the following paragraph:
“To pay on demand the costs and expenses of [NAME] (including any solicitors’, surveyors’ or other professionals’ fees, costs and expenses and any VAT on them) assessed on a full indemnity basis (both during or after the end of the term) in connection with or in contemplation of any of the following: (a) the enforcement of the any of [NAME]’ s Covenants; (b) preparing and serving any notice in connection with this Lease under section 146 or 147 of the Law of Property Act 1925 or taking any proceedings under either of those sections, notwithstanding that forfeiture is avoided otherwise than by relief granted by the court; (c) preparing and serving any notice in connection with this Lease under section 17 of the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995; (d) preparing and serving any notice under this Lease; or (e) to inspect the state of repair and condition of the Demised Premises and/or to ascertain whether any notice has been completed with.”
11. It is further ordered that [RESPONDENT] shall be substituted as respondent for [RESPONDENT] in relation to the lease of flat [ADDRESS].
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Open Market Rent at £750
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal reduces service charges for Manchester flats by £868.27
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Successfully Challenges Unreasonable Service Charge
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Permission to Skip Consultation for Urgent Lift Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Manchester Tribunal Allows Service Charge Determination for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Allows £10,000 Damp Works Without Leaseholder Consultation in York
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Property Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Permits Urgent Repairs Without Prior Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants £8.4 Million Safety Works Dispensation for Manchester Prope…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Allows Flat-Rate Increase in Service Charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Service Charges Not Payable Due to Management Company's Non-Compliance
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair and reasonable proportionate contribution to service charges.
- Service charges must be reasonable and comply with statutory provisions.
- Dispensation from consultation requirements may be granted if the works are urgent and necessary.
- Challenges to service charges under the Landlord and Tenant Act are typically allowed.
- There is no relevant prejudice to the leaseholders when dispensing from consultation requirements.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- No significant factors identified in the provided cases that went against the claimant.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided to vary several clauses in 67 leases under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987.
Who was involved?
The landlord and 67 tenants were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to approve the variations because at least 75% of the tenants supported the changes.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 Sections 37 and 38 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that at least 75% of the tenants supported the lease variations.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can seek variations to their lease if they have the support of at least 75% of the tenants.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of tenant support and the application under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal on a point of law only.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
