VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Decides Rent Registration for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) ruled on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £800, excluding water rates and council tax. This decision helps clarify the rent amount for tenants and landlords.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent registered under the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancy agreementrent registration

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). The tribunal will then determine the rent that a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market under similar conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The decision took effect on 28 March 2021, setting the monthly rent at £800 excluding certain charges.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00BU/MNR/2021/0024

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 22 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Ms [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME] 1A Davyhulme Circle, Urmston, Manchester, [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 800.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 28 March 2021

3. The amount included for services is not applicable Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 28 May 2019

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs S11, Landlord and Tenants Act 1985.

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Unfurnished

8. Description of premises 2 Bed semi-detatched, one living room, kitchen, bathroom, garden, shared drive. External inspection only. Tenant Improvements.

[NAME] of Decision 5 September 2022.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined the rent to be £800.00 per calendar month.
  • The decision on the rent takes effect from 28 March 2021.
  • The tenancy agreement started on 28 May 2019.
  • The property is a 2-bedroom semi-detached house with one living room, kitchen, bathroom, garden, and shared drive.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the monthly rent at £800 for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, ensuring the rent was fair and reasonable.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

Ensuring the rent was fair and reasonable under the Housing Act 1988.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their rent is registered correctly under the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence such as tenancy agreements and relevant legislation were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent registration.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.