VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal has set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £750 per month, effective from 29 January 2025, following the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent registered under the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancy registrationrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then decide on the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The decision applies to a periodic tenancy with the same terms as the original tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal decided to register the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £750 per month, effective from 29 January 2025, under the Housing Act 1988.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CR/MNR/2024/0171 Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination) Housing Act 1988 Section 14 Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 90 Stepping Stone Stourbridge , West Midland, [POSTCODE] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Landlord [RESPONDENT] 29 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant [NAME] & [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £750.00 Per calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 29 January 2025 3. The amount included for services is not applicable N/A Per N/A 4. Date assured tenancy commenced 19 July 2015 5. Length of the term or rental period Calendar monthly 6. Allocation of liability for repairs s.11 Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None 8. Description of premises Three bedroom 1930s semi-detached house. Chairman [NAME] of Decision 29 January 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed12 cases

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the rent for the property to be 750 pounds per calendar month.
  • The tribunal's decision regarding the rent will take effect on 29 January 2025.
  • The property is a three-bedroom 1930s semi-detached house.
  • The tenancy commenced on 19 July 2015.
  • The landlord is liable for repairs under Section 11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided to register the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £750 per month, effective from 29 January 2025.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which governs the registration of rents for assured periodic tenancies.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the application of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent for the assured periodic tenancy.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their rent is registered according to the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents related to the tenancy agreement and the applicable law under the Housing Act 1988.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.