VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property, setting it at £20,470 per year. They used the Retail Price Index and specific formulas to determine the rent, ensuring it aligns with market conditions and statutory guidelines.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined according to the Retail Price Index and statutory formulas.

Topics

fair rent determinationRent Act 1977maximum fair rent

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property based on market conditions and statutory requirements.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £20,470 per year for a property, adjusting for market conditions and statutory requirements under the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: [NAME] First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/OOBK/F77/2024/0619

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord Northumberland and [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The fair rent is £20,470 Per year (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 3 December 2024

3. The amount for services is £852.58 Per year

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

n/a Per n/a

negligible/not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

n/a

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £23,808.00 per year including £852.58 per year.

[NAME] of decision 3 December 2024

[NAME] CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 390.7

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 345.2

X 390.70 Minus Y 345.20 = (A) 45.50

(A) 45.50 Divided by Y 345.20 = (B) 0.131807

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1818

Last registered rent* 16599.86 Multiplied by (C) = 19617.71 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 19618

Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services 852.58

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £20470.42 Per year

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

[NAME]

: LON/OOBK/F77/2024/0619

Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant : Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Application. : Determination of a Fair Rent under section 70 of the Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] (Hons) MA LLM

FRICS

HMCTS Code

: Determination on paper

Date of Decision : 3 December 2024

_______________________________________________

Summary of Reasons

____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024 Decision FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

[NAME]

1. The decision of the Tribunal is that a fair rent of £20,470 per year including £852.58 per year for services is determined with an effective date of 3 December 2024. Background 2. An application was made to re-register a fair rent, received 7 June 2024, by the landlord of the property [RESPONDENT]. Prior to the application to re-register a fair rent, the Rent Officer had registered a rent of £17280 per year including £680.14 per year for services with effect from 23 August 2022.

3. Subsequently the Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £18225.00 per year including service charge of £852.58 per year with effect from 23 August 2024.

4. In a letter dated 9 August 2024, the landlord objected to the rent registered and the matter was referred to the First–tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) (Residential Property).

5. Directions were issued by the Tribunal on the 7 October 2024. Thereafter, the Directions made provision for the filing with the Tribunal of the parties’ respective written submissions and, in particular, for the completion of a reply form giving details of the Property and including any further comments the parties wished the Tribunal to take into account in making its determination. The tenancy is a statutory (protected) periodic tenancy. The tenancy (not being for a fixed tenancy of 7 years or more) is subject to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 which sets out the landlords statutory repairing obligations; the tenant is responsible for internal decorations.

The Property 6. The property is as described by the Rent Register is a self-contained flat with central heating, two rooms, one kitchen a bath and WC. , The Inspection 7. The tribunal did not inspect the property. Relevant Law 8. Provisions in respect of the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and the determination of a fair rent are found in Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9(1) to the Rent Act 1977, as amended by paragraph 34 of the Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013, and section 70 of the Rent Act 1977. Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9 (as amended) “Outcome of determination of fair rent by appropriate tribunal 9. (1) The appropriate tribunal shall-

[NAME] (a) if it appears to them that the rent registered or confirmed by the rent officer is a fair rent, confirm that rent; (b) if it does not appear to them that that rent is a fair rent, determine a fair rent for the dwelling house.” Section 70: Determination of fair rent (as amended) “(1) In determining, for the purposes of the Part of this Act, what rent is or would be a fair rent under a regulated tenancy of a dwelling house, regard shall be had to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) and in particular to- (a) the age, character, locality and state of repair of the dwelling-house, … (b) if any furniture is provided for the use under the tenancy, the quantity, quality and condition of the furniture [, and (c) any premium, or sum in the nature of a premium, which has been or may be lawfully required or received on the grant, renewal, continuance or assignment of the tenancy.] (2) For the purposes of the determination it shall be assumed that the number of persons seeking to become tenants of similar dwelling-houses in locality on the terms (other than those relating to rent) of the regulated tenancy is not substantially greater than the number of such dwelling-houses in the locality which are available for letting on such terms. (3) There shall be disregarded- (a) any disrepair or other defect attributable to a failure by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his to comply with any terms thereof; (b) any improvement carried out, otherwise than in pursuance of the terms of the tenancy, by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his; (c), (d) …[repealed] (e) if any furniture is provided for use under the regulated tenancy, any improvement to the furniture by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor of his or, as the case may be, any deterioration in the condition of the furniture due to any ill-treatment by the tenant, any person residing or lodging with him, or any sub- tenant of his.”

9. Consequently, when determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, has regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the Property. It also disregards the effect of (a) any relevant Tenant’s improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or defect attributed to the Tenant of any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the Property.

[NAME] In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised: (a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for “scarcity” (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on terms- other than as to rent- to that of the regulated tenancy) and (b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market rents) are usually appropriate comparables. (The rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any differences between the comparables and the subject property).

10. In considering scarcity under section 70 (2), the Tribunal recognises that: (a) there are considerable variations in the level of a scarcity in different parts of the country and that there is no general guidance or “rule of thumb” to indicate what adjustments should be made; the Tribunal, therefore, considers the case on its merits; (b) terms relating to rents are to be excluded. A lack of demand at a particular rent is not necessarily evidence of scarcity; it may be evidence that the prospective tenants are not prepared to pay that particular rent. Fair rents are subject to a capping procedure under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 which limits increases by a formula based on the proportional increase in the Retail Price Index since last registration. The only exception to this restriction on a fair rent is provided under paragraph 7 of the Order where a landlord carries out repairs or improvements which increase the rent by 15% or more of the previous registered rent.

Determination on Papers The issue was determined on the papers before the tribunal. Reasons for Decision 13. The rent to be determined must reflect the condition found on the date of the hearing disregarding all tenants' improvements.

14. The process for determining a fair rent is the application of Rent Act 1977 section 70 on the subject property and then comparison with the maximum rent permitted under the Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999. This means that comparison with other properties the subject of Fair Rent is not material.

15. Initially the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is

[NAME] considered usual for such an open market letting. Considering evidence submitted and the Tribunal acting in its capacity as an expert tribunal and using its general knowledge of market levels in the area, concluded that the rent was £ 3100 per month if let on a contemporary assured shorthold basis.

16. The Property is not in the condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent, therefore, it is necessary to adjust the above hypothetical rent, a deduction of 10% is made. In addition, the Tribunal determined that there should be a further deduction of 10% to reflect the fact the terms and conditions and goods supplied under the tenancy would differ from those of a contemporary assured shorthold tenancy, from which the rental comparables are derived. Thereafter the Tribunal considered the question of scarcity in section 70 (2) of the Rent Act 1977. A figure of 20% was adopted. The calculation 17. The rent prior to adjustment for condition, terms and scarcity, but adjusted for service charge is: £3100.00 per month Less 10% condition and 10% for terms – white goods and internal decoration responsibilities Sub total 20% £620.00 per month

---------------------- £2480 per month Less Scarcity 20% £496 per month

---------------------- £1984 per month 18. The rent after this final adjustment was £1984.00 per month, which is equivalent £23808 per year including £852.58 per year. Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 19. The rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent Order) 1999. The rent calculated in accordance with the Order is £23808 per year including a service charge of £ 852.58 per year. This figure is higher than the figure calculated by reference to the market rent with adjustments, of £20470 per year including a service charge of £852.58 per year.

20.

Accordingly, the sum of £20470 per year including a service charge of £852.58 per year is registered from 3 December 2024, being the date of the Tribunal’s decision.

Valuer Chair: [NAME]

[NAME]: 3 December 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent was determined by increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index.
  • An additional 5% was added because this was a second or subsequent application for re-registration since February 1, 1999.
  • The calculated rent was rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
  • The maximum fair rent included the service charge.
  • The rent was adjusted downwards by 10% to reflect the property's condition, as it was not typical for a modern letting.
  • A further 10% deduction was applied because the tenancy terms and goods differed from a contemporary assured shorthold tenancy.
  • A 20% deduction was applied for scarcity, as required by the Rent Act 1977.
  • The rent to be registered was limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 because the market-based calculation was higher.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a fair rent of £20,470 per year for a property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

They used the Retail Price Index and specific formulas to ensure the rent was fair and aligned with market conditions.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the application of the Retail Price Index and statutory formulas to determine a fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be determined similarly, considering market conditions and statutory requirements.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Market data and statutory formulas were crucial in determining the fair rent.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed through the appropriate legal channels.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

Yes, it is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.