VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property, applying the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 to cap the rent at £180.40 per week, including a variable service charge of £60.90 per week.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that is capped according to the Retail Price Index and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Topics

fair rentregulated tenancyRetail Price Index

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property, adjusting it according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property, applying the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 to cap the rent at £180.40 per week, including a variable service charge of £60.90 per week.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HX/F77/2024/0010

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 19 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]

Landlord The [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is 180.40 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 25 March 2024

3. The amount for services is £60.90 Per Week

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

n/a Per n/a

not applicable

5. The rent is to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £208.90 per including £60.90 per Week for services (variable).

[NAME] of decision 25 March 2024

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 381.0

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 304.0

X 381.0 Minus Y 304.0 = (A) 77.0

(A) 77.0 Divided by Y 304.0 = (B) 0.2533

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.3033

Last registered rent* £91.46 Multiplied by (C) = 119.20 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £119.50

Variable service charge YES If YES add amount for services £60.90

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £180.40 Per Week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/00HX/F77/2024/0010 Property : 19 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant Landlord :

The [APPELLANT] : None Respondent Tenant : Mrs [COUNSEL] : None Type of Application :

Rent Act 1977 (“the Act”) Determination by the First-Tier Tribunal of the fair rent of a property following an objection to the rent registered by the Rent Officer.

Tribunal Members :

Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None. Determined on the papers

Date of Decision

:

25th March 2024

DECISION

CHI/00HX/F77/2024/0010

2

Summary of Decision On 25th March 2024 the Tribunal determined a Fair Rent of £180.40 per week including a variable service charge of £60.90 per week with effect from 25th March 2024.

Background 1. On 2nd November 2024 the Landlord applied to the Rent Officer for registration of a fair rent of £148.32 per week to include a service charge of £60.90 per week.

2. The rent was previously registered on 16th June 2021 at £125 per week including £33.54 for the variable service charge following a determination by the Rent Officer. The net rent was therefore £91.46 per week and was effective from 16th June 2021.

3. A new rent was registered by the Rent Officer on the 15th December 2023 at a figure of £141.98 per week including £60.90 attributed to services. The net rent was therefore reduced to £80.18 and was effective from 15th December 2023.

4. On 23rd January 2024 the Landlord appealed the decision and the case was referred to the First-Tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property) formerly a Rent Assessment Committee.

5. The Tribunal does not routinely consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.

6. The Tribunal office issued directions on 6th February 2024 which informed the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent on the basis of written representations subject to the parties requesting an oral hearing. No request was made by the parties for a hearing.

7. Both parties were invited to include photographs and video within their representations if they so wished and were informed that the Tribunal might also consider information about the property available on the internet.

8. Neither party made any further representation to the Tribunal.

The Law 9. When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, had regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also disregarded the effect of (a) any relevant tenant's improvements and (b) the effect of any

CHI/00HX/F77/2024/0010

3 disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property.

10. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised

(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and

(b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).

11. The Tribunal also has to have regard to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 where applicable. Most objections and determinations of registered rents are now subject to the Order, which limits the amount of rent that can be charged by linking increases to the Retail Price Index. It is the duty of the Property Tribunal to arrive at a fair rent under section 70 of the Act but in addition to calculate the maximum fair rent which can be registered according to the rules of the Order. If that maximum rent is below the fair rent calculated as above, then that (maximum) sum must be registered as the fair rent for the subject property.

The Property 12. From the information provided and available on the internet, the property can be described as a self-contained purpose built first-floor flat situated within Swindon.

13. The accommodation is described as comprising Living Room, Kitchen, Bedroom and Bathroom with WC plus a Store. Outside there are communal gardens and parking. Windows are double glazed and there is gas-fired central heating.

Evidence and Representations 14. The original tenancy began on 21st December 1992.

15. The Rent Officer has assessed an open market rent for the property of £750 per month and then made deductions for scarcity, Tenant’s provision of white goods, carpets and curtains, an unmodernised kitchen and Tenant’s responsibility for internal decoration.

CHI/00HX/F77/2024/0010

4 16. In the absence of further information from either party the Tribunal could only rely on its own knowledge and experience of local rental values in determining the rent.

Valuation 17. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only, with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.

18. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the good condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. Market rents are usually expressed as a figure per month and a letting would normally include floorings, curtains and white goods to all be provided by the Landlord.

19. In determining an ‘open market rent’ the Tribunal had regard to the Tribunal's own general knowledge of market rent levels in the area of North Wiltshire. Having done so it concluded that such a likely market rent would be £750 per calendar month.

20. However, the property was not let in a condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent. Therefore, it was first necessary to adjust that hypothetical rent of £750 per calendar month to reflect the factors detailed by the Rent officer.

21. The Tribunal therefore considered that this required a total deduction of £110 per month made up as follows:

Tenant’s provision of carpets £20 Tenant’s provision of white goods £30 Tenant’s provision of curtains £10 Tenant’s liability for internal decoration £20 Unmodernised kitchen £30 TOTAL per month £110

22. The Tribunal noted the number of properties available to rent in the area as advertised on Rightmove and concluded that there was not any substantial scarcity element in the area of north Wiltshire.

Decision 23. Having made the adjustments indicated above the Fair Rent determined by the Tribunal for the purpose of section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 was accordingly £640 per calendar month which equates to £148 per week. This rent should then be adjusted to reflect the level of services provided in the sum of £60.90 per week equating to a new gross rent of £208.90 per week.

CHI/00HX/F77/2024/0010

5 24. The Section 70 Fair Rent determined by the Tribunal is above the maximum fair rent of 180.40 per week permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 details of which are shown on the rear of the Decision Notice and accordingly we determine that the lower sum of £180.40 per week is registered as the Fair Rent with effect from 25th March 2024.

Accordingly, the sum of £180.40 per week, including £60.90 for services, will be registered as the Fair Rent with effect from the 25th March 2024, this being the date of the Tribunal’s decision.

It is important to note that the Landlord is not obliged to collect this higher rent.

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent was capped by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 because the calculated fair rent was higher than the maximum allowed.
  • The maximum fair rent was calculated by increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the Retail Price Index.
  • A 5% increase was added to the RPI percentage change because this was a second or subsequent application since February 1999.
  • The variable service charge was added to the calculated rent after the RPI formula was applied to determine the maximum fair rent.
  • The Tribunal determined the case based on written papers because neither party requested an oral hearing or inspection.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord's initial application for a fair rent of £148.32 per week was not accepted as the final registered rent.
  • The Rent Officer's registered rent of £141.98 per week was not accepted as the final fair rent.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision determined a fair rent for a property, capping it at £180.40 per week, including a variable service charge of £60.90 per week.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, which caps the rent according to the Retail Price Index.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 to cap the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord, as the rent was capped at a lower rate than initially proposed.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

For someone in a similar situation, the rent for a property will be capped according to the Retail Price Index.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs and video representations were considered, but neither party made further representations.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a person wishing to appeal this decision must seek permission to do so by making a written application to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

Yes, it is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.