VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £720 per month for a property. They took into account the property's condition and its market value to determine the fair rent. The decision was made according to the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and market value, adjusted for any relevant differences.

Topics

fair rent determinationregulated tenancyrent act 1977

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal determined a fair rent for a property considering various factors including the property's condition and market value.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent of £720 per month for a property, adjusting for the property's condition and market value. The decision was based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AZ/F77/2022/0116

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 46 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] (attn [RESPONDENT])

Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £720 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 22 February 2023

3. The amount for services is

Per

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) .............................................................................................................. The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £ 799 per month prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 22 February 2023

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 360.4

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 293.3

X 360.4 Minus Y 293.3 = (A) 67.1

(A) 67.1 Divided by Y 293.3 = (B) 0.22878

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.27878

Last registered rent* £624.50 Multiplied by (C) = £798.59 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £799

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £799 Per month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

Case Reference : LON/00BJ/F77/2022/0199

P:PAPERREMOTE

Property : 46 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted] : 28 June 2022

Type of Application : Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mrs [NAME]

Mr [NAME] and venue of : 22 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

_______________________________________________

DECISION ____________________________________

This has been a hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable, no- one requested the same. The documents that we were referred to were in an electronic bundle the contents of which we have recorded.

The registered rent with effect from 22 February 2023 is £720 per month.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Background

1. On 18 April 2022 the landlord applied to the rent officer for registration of a fair rent of £1100 per month for the above property.

2. The registered rent at the date of the application was £624.50 per month which had been registered by the rent officer on 3 August 2020 with effect from the same date.

3. On 13 June 2022, the rent officer registered a fair rent of £744 per month with effect from 3 August 2022.

4. On 28 June 2022 the tenant objected to the registered rent.

5. The tribunal issued Directions on 21 July 2022. The landlord and tenant made written representations prior to the hearing.

The Evidence

6. The landlord stated that the tenant had modernised the house and maintained it well. A floor plan showing the current layout was provided together with a letter from a local agent advising that the open market rental value was £2300 per month.

7. The tenant was of the opinion that the increase in rent was excessive. He had provided the central heating and double glazing, fitted out the kitchen, replaced that bathroom and wc fittings, provided the carpets, curtains and white goods, created a parkin space in the front garden and decorated the exterior of the property.

The Inspection

8. The tribunal inspected the property on the morning of 22 February 2023 in the presence of the tenant. The property is a terraced house in a residential street of similar properties close to bus stops, [ADDRESS] station and local shops.

9. The accommodation comprises two rooms and kitchen on the ground floor and two double and a single bedroom, and bathroom and separate wc on the first floor. French windows in the kitchen lead into the rear garden which provides access to a brick building attached to the house used as a store room but was a scullery at the beginning of the tenancy, there being no other sink at ground floor level at that time.

10. The tenant has modernised the entire house to a good standard: including installing double glazed windows and central heating, converting the rear right room into a kitchen with fitted units and appliances, a modern bathroom and separate wc and boarded out the loft.

The Law

11. When determining a fair rent the tribunal, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also must disregard the effect of any relevant tenant’s improvements and the effect of any disrepair or any other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property. The Tribunal is unable to take into account the tenant’s personal circumstances when assessing the fair rent.

12. In [COMPANY] v [NAME] of the Greater Manchester etc Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 the Court of appeal emphasised:

That ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for scarcity i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms to that of a regulated tenancy, and

That for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy market rents are usually appropriate comparables; adjusted as necessary to reflect any relevant differences between the comparables and the subject property.

Valuation 13. In the first instance the tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and on the terms that is considered usual for such an open market letting. The tribunal relied the evidence supplied by the landlord and its own general knowledge of rental values in [ADDRESS] and concluded that the likely market rent for the property would be £2300 per month.

14. However, it was first necessary to adjust the hypothetical rent of £2300 per month to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the valuation date, ignoring any tenant’s improvements, (disregarding the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title). The tribunal determined that the hypothetical rent should be reduced by £1400 to reflect the difference in the terms of the tenancy, single glazed windows, no heating, no wash basin, dated bath, scullery accessed via the garden and the lack of carpets, curtains and white goods which are usually provided on the open market.

15. This leaves an adjusted market rent for the subject property of £900 per month. The tribunal was of the opinion that there was substantial scarcity in Greater London for similar properties and therefore made a deduction of approximately 20% from the adjusted market rent to reflect this element. The tribunal’s uncapped fair rent is 720 per month.

Decision

16. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was accordingly £720 per month. This is below the maximum fair rent of £799 per month calculated under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

19. Accordingly, the sum of £720 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 22 February 2023 being the date of the tribunal's decision.

[NAME]: [NAME]: 23 February 2023

ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

i. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

ii. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.

iii. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.

iv. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent is based on the property's condition and market value.
  • The rent is adjusted for relevant differences between the terms of the tenancy.
  • The rent is assessed according to the Retail Price Index and relevant regulations.
  • The rent is determined by the Tribunal considering multiple factors including location and state of repair.
  • The rent is capped under the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The maximum fair rent cannot exceed the amount strictly calculated by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tribunal set a fair rent of £720 per month for the property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and market value, adjusting for any relevant differences.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the adjustment for the property's condition and market value.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and market value.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be determined based on the property's condition and market value.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence included the property's condition, improvements made by the tenant, and market rental values.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.