First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £720 per month for a property, taking into account the property's condition and market value. The decision was made under the Rent Act 1977, considering various factors such as the property's age, location, and state of repair.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and market value, adjusted for any relevant differences between the terms of the tenancy and those of an open market letting.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering various factors including the property's condition and market value.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £720 per month for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering the property's condition and market value. The decision was based on the property's age, location, and state of repair, among other factors.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AZ/F77/2022/0116
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 46 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] (attn [RESPONDENT])
Tenant [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £720 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 22 February 2023
3. The amount for services is
Per
not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
Per
not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £ 799 per month prescribed by the Order.
[NAME] of decision 22 February 2023
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 360.4
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 293.3
X 360.4 Minus Y 293.3 = (A) 67.1
(A) 67.1 Divided by Y 293.3 = (B) 0.22878
First [NAME] for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.27878
Last registered rent* £624.50 Multiplied by (C) = £798.59 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £799
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £799 Per month
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present [NAME] was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent [NAME] since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the
variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the [NAME] of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
Case Reference : LON/00BJ/F77/2022/0199
P:PAPERREMOTE
Property : 46 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : 28 June 2022
Type of [NAME] : Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977
Tribunal
: Mrs [NAME]
Mr [NAME] and venue of : 22 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
_______________________________________________
DECISION ____________________________________
This has been a hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable, no-one requested the same. The documents that we were referred to were in an electronic bundle the contents of which we have recorded.
The registered rent with effect from 22 February 2023 is £720 per month.
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
Background
1. On 18 April 2022 the landlord applied to the rent officer for registration of a fair rent of £1100 per month for the above property.
2. The registered rent at the date of the [NAME] was £624.50 per month which had been registered by the rent officer on 3 August 2020 with effect from the same date.
3. On 13 June 2022, the rent officer registered a fair rent of £744 per month with effect from 3 August 2022.
4. On 28 June 2022 the tenant objected to the registered rent.
5. The tribunal issued Directions on 21 July 2022. The landlord and tenant made written representations prior to the hearing.
The Evidence
6. The landlord stated that the tenant had modernised the house and maintained it well. A floor plan showing the current layout was provided together with a letter from a local agent advising that the open market rental value was £2300 per month.
7. The tenant was of the opinion that the increase in rent was excessive. He had provided the central heating and double glazing, fitted out the kitchen, replaced that bathroom and wc fittings, provided the carpets, curtains and white goods, created a parkin space in the front garden and decorated the exterior of the property.
The Inspection
8. The tribunal inspected the property on the morning of 22 February 2023 in the presence of the tenant. The property is a terraced house in a residential street of similar properties close to bus stops, [ADDRESS] station and local shops.
9. The accommodation comprises two rooms and kitchen on the ground floor and two double and a single bedroom, and bathroom and separate wc on the first floor. French windows in the kitchen lead into the rear garden which provides access to a brick building attached to the house used as a store room but was a scullery at the beginning of the tenancy, there being no other sink at ground floor level at that time.
10. The tenant has modernised the entire house to a good standard: including installing double glazed windows and central heating, converting the rear
right room into a kitchen with fitted units and appliances, a modern bathroom and separate wc and boarded out the loft.
The Law
11. When determining a fair rent the tribunal, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also must disregard the effect of any relevant tenant’s improvements and the effect of any disrepair or any other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property. The Tribunal is unable to take into account the tenant’s personal circumstances when assessing the fair rent.
12. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 the Court of appeal emphasised:
That ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for scarcity i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms to that of a regulated tenancy, and
That for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy market rents are usually appropriate comparables; adjusted as necessary to reflect any relevant differences between the comparables and the subject property.
Valuation 13. In the first instance the tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and on the terms that is considered usual for such an open market letting. The tribunal relied the evidence supplied by the landlord and its own general knowledge of rental values in [ADDRESS] and concluded that the likely market rent for the property would be £2300 per month.
14. However, it was first necessary to adjust the hypothetical rent of £2300 per month to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the valuation date, ignoring any tenant’s improvements, (disregarding the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title). The tribunal determined that the hypothetical rent should be reduced by £1400 to reflect the difference in the terms of the tenancy, single glazed windows, no heating, no wash basin, dated bath,
scullery accessed via the garden and the lack of carpets, curtains and white goods which are usually provided on the open market.
15. This leaves an adjusted market rent for the subject property of £900 per month. The tribunal was of the opinion that there was substantial scarcity in Greater London for similar properties and therefore made a deduction of approximately 20% from the adjusted market rent to reflect this element. The tribunal’s uncapped fair rent is 720 per month.
Decision
16. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was accordingly £720 per month. This is below the maximum fair rent of £799 per month calculated under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
19. Accordingly, the sum of £720 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 22 February 2023 being the date of the tribunal's decision.
Chairman: [NAME]: 23 February 2023
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
i. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
ii. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
iii. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
iv. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case
number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Caps Fair Rent at £265 per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines £832 as Fair Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Below Maximum Limit
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets fair rent of £98.00 per week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £122.00 Per Week Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets maximum fair rent for property under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets maximum fair rent under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £139 Per Week for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Property Under Rent Act 1977
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent set by the Tribunal under relevant legislation.
- The fair rent takes into account the property's condition and market conditions.
- The calculation of the fair rent is adjusted for any relevant differences.
- The maximum fair rent is calculated according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
- The fair rent is determined based on the Retail Price Index and relevant legislation.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £720 per month for a property.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and market value, considering factors such as the property's age, location, and state of repair.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the valuation of the property based on its condition and market value.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and market value.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the property's condition and market value when arguing for a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence such as the property's condition, market value, and comparable rental values were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
