VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a property in East London. They considered the property's condition, market rent, and the scarcity of similar properties in the area. The final fair rent was set at £648.50 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination that takes into account the property's condition, market rent, and scarcity of similar properties.

Topics

fair rent determinationproperty condition assessmentmarket rent comparison

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal determined the fair rent for a property considering various factors including market rent, property condition, and scarcity.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property located in East London, taking into account the property's condition, market rent, and scarcity of similar properties in the area.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AM/F77/2020/0034

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME]

Landlord F.[APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £648.50 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 18th May 2021

3. The amount for services is Nil Per

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Nil Per

negligible/not applicable

5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

None

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £ 728.00 per month .

(b) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ ......... per ................... including £ ......................................... per ................................ for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 18th May 2021

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 296.9

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 276.00

X 296.9 Minus Y 276.00 = (A) 20.9

(A) 20.9 Divided by Y 276.00 = (B) 0.07572

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1257

Last registered rent* 576.00 Multiplied by (C) = 648.41 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 648.50

Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £648..50 Per month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the

variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AM/F77/2020/0034 HMCTS code (paper, video, audio) : V: SKYPEREMOTE Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : In person Respondent : [redacted] : [COUNSEL], Managing Agent Date of application : 31 October 2019 Type of application : Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977 Tribunal members :

Mr [NAME] [NAME] : Remote hearing Date of decision : 18 May 2021

DECISION

Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing This has been a remote video hearing which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was V: SKYPEREMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practical and all issues could be determined through the video hearing. The documents the tribunal referred to were submitted by both parties. Background 1. The landlord applied to the Rent Office for the registration of a fair rent on 31 October 2019.

2. The fair rent was set at £635 per month on 17 January 2020. This rent was subject to the capping provisions of the Rent Act Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999.

3. The tenant subsequently challenged the revised registered rent and the rent officer has requested the matter be referred to the tribunal for determination.

4. Directions were issued following receipt of the objection. The Directions stated the application was suitable for determination on the basis of rent submissions with a video hearing.

5. The tribunal had previously informed the parties of their rights to request an oral hearing. The tribunal having already advised that due to the difficulties posed by Covid-19, a face-to-face hearing would not be possible.

6.

Accordingly, the tribunal has determined the fair rent on the basis of written submissions with the video hearing, attended by the tenant.

7. Prior to the hearing, the parties were invited to submit relevant information on market rents in the area for similar properties. They were also invited to offer any details of property dilapidation and repairs or improvements made to the property by the landlord or tenant.

8. Written submissions were received from both parties. The premises 9. Covid-19 restrictions prevented any inspection of this property.

10. The parties were invited to provide a full description of the property on a reply form provided to them by the tribunal. The applicant provided a detailed description of the property.

11. It is a first-floor studio flat with an adjacent bathroom with toilet, wash hand basin and electric shower. The studio flat has all mains services.

12. The property has secondary-glazing to the front windows provided by the applicant. There is no off-street parking, garden or other facilities.

13. The tribunal has relied upon this description in their determination of the rent. Reported defects and obsolescence 14. Neither the applicant nor respondent reported any specific defects to the property in their written submissions.

15. The applicant confirmed to the tribunal at the hearing that the property has no central heating. The kitchen and sanitary fittings are dated and the dwelling suffers from dilapidation due to lack of regular maintenance.

16. The condition of the property is a material consideration when carrying out a fair rent determination. The tribunal has also had regard for dilapidation and obsolescence at the property. The law 17. When determining a fair rent the tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, 'the Act', it had regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also disregarded the effect of (a) any relevant tenant's improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property.

18. In [COMPANY] –v– Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee [1995] and [NAME] –v– London Rent Assessment Committee [1999] the Court of Appeal emphasised that ordinarily a fair rent is the Market Rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity'. This is that element, if any, of the Market Rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms.

19. The Market Rents charged for assured tenancy lettings often form appropriate comparable transactions from which a scarcity deduction is made.

20. These Market Rents are also adjusted where appropriate to reflect any relevant differences between those of the subject and comparable rental properties.

21. The Upper Tribunal in Trustees of the [COMPANY] –v– Bandy [2015] explained the duty of the First-tier Tribunal to present comprehensive and cogent fair rent findings. These directions are applied in this Decision.

22. The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 applies to all dwelling houses where an application for the registration of a new rent is made after the date of the Order and there is an existing registered rent under part IV of the Act. This article restricts any rental increase to 5% above the previously registered rent. The article is not applied should the tribunal assess that as a consequence of repairs or improvements carried out by the landlord the rent that is determined in response to an application for a new rent registration exceeds by at least 15% the previous rent registered.

Valuation 23. In the first instance the tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to their general knowledge of market levels in this area of East London.

24. This hypothetical rent is adjusted as necessary to allow for the differences between the terms and conditions considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the date of the inspection. Any rental benefit derived from tenant’s improvements is disregarded. It is also necessary to disregard the effect of any disrepair or other defects attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title.

25. The provisions of section 70(2) of the Rent Act 1977 in effect require the elimination of what is called 'scarcity'. The required assumption is of a neutral market. Where a tribunal considers that there is, in fact, substantial scarcity, it must make an adjustment to the rent to reflect that circumstance. In the present case neither party provided evidence with regard to scarcity.

26. The tribunal then considered the decision of the High Court in [COMPANY] –v– London Rent Assessment Committee [2002] EWHC 835 (Admin) which required it to consider scarcity over a wide area rather than limit it to a particular locality. East London is now considered to be an appropriate area to use as a yardstick for measuring scarcity and it is clear that there is a substantial measure of scarcity in East London.

27. Assessing a scarcity percentage cannot be a precise arithmetical calculation. It can only be a judgement based on the years of experience of members of the tribunal. The tribunal therefore relied on its own combined knowledge and experience of the supply and demand for similar properties on the terms of the regulated tenancy (other than as to rent) and in particular to unfulfilled demand for such accommodation. In doing so, the tribunal found there was substantial scarcity in the locality of East London and, therefore, made a further deduction of 20%.

28. The valuation of a fair rent is an exercise that relies upon relevant Market Rent comparable transactions and property specific adjustments. The fair rents charged for other similar properties in the locality do not form relevant transaction evidence.

29. The tribunal has had regard for the comparable transaction rental evidence presented by the representatives of both the landlord and tenant. They have relied upon their knowledge and experience of the Market Rents in the locality to determine the appropriate Market Rent for this property to be used in the fair rent calculation.

30. Table 1 below provides details of the fair rent calculation:

Decision 31. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Committee for the purpose of section 70 was accordingly £728.00 per month. By virtue of The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, the Maximum Fair Rent that can be registered at this property is £648.50.

32. It is the opinion of the tribunal that there are no grounds for the Rent Acts Order to be relaxed from this dwelling. The statutory formula applied to the previously registered rent to be calculated at the capped rent is at Annex A. Details of the Maximum Fair Rent calculation were provided in the original Notice of Decision.

33. Accordingly, the sum that will be registered as a fair rent with effect from 18 May 2021 is £648.50 per month.

Property: First floor flat, 134D [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Fair rent calculation in accordance with s(70) Rent Act 1977 Market rent £1,300.00 per month Disregards per month as % of period £65.00 5.00% Dilapidations per month as % of period Extensive dilapidation £130.00 10.00% Dated kitchen and bathroom fittings £97.50 7.50% Lack of central heating £97.50 7.50% £390.00 25.00% Adjusted Rent balance £910.00 30.00% Less Scarcity 20.00% £182.00 Adjusted Market Rent £728.00 per month Uncapped rent Capped rent in accordance with 648.50 £ per month Capped rent Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 Total deductions Carpets , curtains white, goods, soft furnishing ,

Name: [NAME]: 21st July 2021

Valuer Chairman

Appendix A The Rents Act (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 2 (1) Where this article applies, the amount to be registered as the rent of the dwelling-house under Part IV shall not, subject to paragraph (5), exceed the maximum fair rent calculated in accordance with the formula set out in paragraph (2).

(2) The formula is:

MFR = LR [1 + (x-y) +P]

y

where:

• 'MFR' is the maximum fair rent; • 'LR' is the amount of the existing registered rent to the dwelling-house; • 'x' is the index published in the month immediately preceding the month in which the determination of a fair rent is made under Part IV; • 'y' is the published index for the month in which the rent was last registered under Part IV before the date of the application for registration of a new rent; and • 'P' is 0.075 for the first application for rent registration of the dwelling- house after this Order comes into force and 0.05 for every subsequent application.

(3) Where the maximum fair rent calculated in accordance with paragraph (2) is not an integral multiple of 50 pence the maximum fair rent shall be that amount rounded up to the nearest integral multiple of 50 pence.

(4) If (x-y) + P is less than zero the maximum fair rent shall be the y existing registered rent.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent calculation must consider the property's age, location, and state of repair.
  • The market rent for the property should be discounted for scarcity if there is a significant shortage of similar properties.
  • The tribunal's combined knowledge and experience of supply and demand for similar properties is used to assess scarcity.
  • The maximum fair rent is capped by a statutory formula that increases the previous registered rent by RPI and an additional percentage.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal set the fair rent for a property at £648.50 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition, market rent, and scarcity of similar properties in the area.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the scarcity of similar properties in the area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the property's condition, market rent, and scarcity of similar properties when challenging a fair rent determination.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of the property's condition, market rent, and scarcity of similar properties in the area mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.