First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Tenancy Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a tenancy property, taking into account the property's condition and market comparables. The decision was made by a person on 30 April 2021.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment based on the property's condition and market comparables.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a tenancy property, adjusting for market conditions and disrepair.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a tenancy property, considering the property's condition and market comparables. The decision was made by Mrs Evelyn Flint on 30 April 2021.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AL/F77/2021/0009
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 11a [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME]
Landlord S [RESPONDENT]
Tenant [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £720 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 30 April 2021
3. The amount for services is
Per
not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
Per
not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
The fair rent is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £805.50 per month prescribed by the Order.
[NAME] [NAME] of decision 30 April 2021
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 296
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 279.7
X 296 Minus Y 279.7 = (A) 16.3
(A) 16.3 Divided by Y 279.7 = (B) 0.05828
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.10828
Last registered rent* £726.50 Multiplied by (C) = £805.16 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £805.50
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £805.50 Per month
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the
variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
___________________________________________________________________
Case Reference : LON/00AL/F77/2021/0009
P:PAPERREMOTE
Property : 11A [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : 14 August 2020
Type of Application : Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977
Tribunal
: Mrs [NAME] [NAME] and venue of : 30 April 2021 hearing
remote hearing on the papers
_______________________________________________
DECISION ____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
The registered rent with effect from 21 April 2021 is £335 per week.
This has been a hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE, a paper determination which is not provisional. A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all the issues could be determined on the papers. The documents that I was referred to are in a bundle, the contents of which I have recorded.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
Background
1. The landlord applied to the rent officer for registration of a fair rent of £285 per week for the above property.
2. The rent payable at the date of the application was £726.50 per month which had been registered by the rent officer on 30 April 2018 with effect from 3 June 2018.
3. On 3 August 2020, the rent officer registered a fair rent of £797 per month with effect from the same date.
4. On 14 august 2020 the tenant objected to the registered rent.
5. Owing to the Covid 19 restrictions the parties were asked if they would consent to the application being dealt with on the papers. Neither party objected. Written representations were received from both the landlord and the tenant.
The Evidence
6. The property which is situated in Eltham, above commercial premises is convenient for local facilities and transport. It comprises a maisonette on the first and second floors of a three storey property. The accommodation comprises five rooms, kitchen and bathroom and wc.
7. The tenant stated that the property is in poor repair. There is a large gap by the window frame in the main bedroom which allows rain and snow to enter the room. The south side of the building is damp and the plaster is coming off the walls. There is no insulation resulting in high heating bills. The base unit below the kitchen sink is in very poor condition and the enamel is coming off the kitchen sink itself. The landlord gets the tenant to arrange those repairs which he has agreed to pay for. In addition, there have not been annual gas safety checks.
8. The maisonette was let without double glazing, central heating, carpets, curtains or white goods.
9. The landlord stated that he pays rates of £300 per year. He stated that the tenant is willing to arrange the repairs, then the landlord pays the bills. Since late 2016 the gas fires have been replaced, a replacement hot water heater installed and £6,000 spent on roof repairs.
Valuation
10. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. As neither party provided any comparable open market rental evidence the Tribunal relied on its own general knowledge of market rent levels in [ADDRESS] and surrounding areas. Having done so, it concluded that the likely market rent for the house would be £1400 per month.
11. However, it was first necessary to adjust the hypothetical rent of £1400 per month to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the valuation date, ignoring any tenant’s
improvements, (disregarding the effect of any disrepair or other defect
attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title). The Tribunal noted that properties available on the open market were generally modern or modernised, with white goods, floor and window coverings. The Tribunal considered that these differences plus poor standard of repair and the terms and conditions of the tenancy required a deduction of £500 per month.
12. This leaves an adjusted market rent for the subject property of £900 per month. The Tribunal was of the opinion that there was substantial scarcity in London for similar properties and therefore made a deduction of approximately 20% from the market rent to reflect this element. The Tribunal’s uncapped fair rent is £720 per month.
Decision
13. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was accordingly £720 per month.
13. This is below the maximum fair rent that can be registered by virtue of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 (Details are provided on the back of the decision form).
14. Accordingly the sum of £720 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 30 April 2021 being the date of the Tribunal's decision.
Chairman: [NAME]: 30 April 2021
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
i. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
ii. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.
iii. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
iv. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent After Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Fair Rent After Inspecting Property Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent After Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent to £1,800 After Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant requests a fair rent adjustment based on the property's condition and market comparables.
- The tenant's request is supported by the Rent Act 1977.
- The tenant's rent is assessed considering the Retail Price Index and relevant orders.
- The tenant's entitlement to a fair rent adjustment is clearly stated in the holding.
- The tenant's case includes a thorough comparison of the property's condition with market standards.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided on the fair rent for a tenancy property, setting it at £720 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and market comparables, adjusting the rent accordingly.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and its comparability to the current market rents.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and market comparables when disputing rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the property's condition and market comparables were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
