First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent of £1270.00 per month for an assured periodic tenancy. They considered the condition of the property and similar rents in the area to reach their decision.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the condition and comparables of the property.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is already set by a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, tenants can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the rent after considering comparable properties and the condition of the property.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1270.00 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the condition of the property and comparable rents in the area.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/18UB/MNR/2024/0610
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 2 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] J [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Ms [RESPONDENT] 2 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1270.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 26 November 2024
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 December 2021
5. Length of the term or rental period Periodic
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord n/a
8. Description of premises 4 bedroom house over three storeys with garden.
[NAME] of Decision 26 November 2024
1
Case Reference
: HAV/18UB/MNR/2024/0610
Property : 2 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Objection : 1 October 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: R [NAME] [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 26 November 2024
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1270.00 per month with effect from 26 November 2024. ____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 25 September 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1400.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £1250.00 per month to take effect from 1 November 2024.
2. On 1 October 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 1 October 2024.
Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.
Evidence 4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord. The Application Form from the Tenant stated the property is a four-bedroom house arranged over three floors. On the ground floor there is a kitchen, living room, dining room, cloakroom, and outside garden. On the first floor there are three double bedrooms, and a family bathroom. On the second floor a master bedroom, ensuite bathroom and study.
5. The Landlord’s Reply Form noted she provided central heating, double glazing, carpets and cooker. The windows were replaced in 2021/23. The landlord supplied a comparable at £1500.00 per month.
6. The Tenant also completed a Reply Form, with photographs, showing signs of wear and tear, render falling off and damp patches.
7. The Tenant also noted the gas and electricity supply is shared with an adjacent annexe which is let out separately. The Landlord apportions the gas, and electricity bills and contributes £75 per month for the amount used by the annexe which she pays to the Tenant. The Tenant cited a comparable of £1250 per month for a 5-bedroom property.
Determination and Valuation
8. Having considered the comparable evidence provided by the parties and our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in a good condition would be in the region of £1450.00 per month.
9. The property differs from a property in contemporary letting condition, the tenant providing the curtains and white goods and also features shared utilities. The tribunal makes a deduction of 12.5% to reflect these giving a rent of £1250.00 per month.
3
Decision 10. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1270.00 per month. The tenant notes they are on benefits and that an increase in the rent would be difficult. The Tribunal considers this an expression of hardship and determines the date of increase to be date of the decision 26 November 2024.
11. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1270.00 per month to take effect on 26 November 2024.
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent to £1,800 After Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £950 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Case in First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Adjustment in First-tier Tribunal Case
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent After Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent After Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination Adjusted Due to Property Condition
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property's condition is considered for rent adjustment.
- Market comparables are used to determine fair rent.
- Fair market rent adjustments are granted based on property conditions.
- Rent adjustments reflect the open market value of the property.
- Comparable properties in the area influence the decision.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new rent of £1270.00 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court considered the condition of the property and similar rents in the area to determine a fair market rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the comparable rents in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may be able to get a fair market rent adjustment based on the condition of the property and comparable rents.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions from both the tenant and the landlord were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed if either party requests full reasons and follows the appeal process.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent adjustments.
