Rent Determination Adjusted Due to Property Condition
📌 In brief
In this case, a tenant challenged their landlord’s proposed rent increase. The tribunal reviewed the condition of the property and comparable rental prices in the area and set the rent at £900 per month instead of the landlord's proposed £1300 due to extensive dampness and mould issues.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on property condition and comparable properties in the area.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on the conditions of the property and similar properties in the area.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £900 per month, adjusting it from the landlord's proposed increase due to extensive damp and mould issues.
📜 Headnote Official document
The tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £900 per month, adjusting it from the landlord's proposed increase of £1300 due to extensive damp and mould issues affecting the property.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00AH/MNR/2023/0198
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 5 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
R Waterhouse FRICS J Francis QPM
Landlord Lifespace Address 16/[ADDRESS], Southend-on-sea, Essex, [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 900 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 21st April 2023
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable n/a Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 21st October 2016
6. Length of the term or rental period 12 months
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord n/a
9. Description of premises Semi-detached house, two rooms on ground with kitchen, first floor two further rooms and bathroom off one room, garden.
Chairman R Waterhouse FRICS Date of Decision 19th October 2023
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : JM/LON/OOAH/MNR/2023/0198 Property : 5 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : In Person Respondent : [redacted] Representative : In Person Type of [NAME] : Market Rent under s13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal member(s) : Mr R Waterhouse MA LLM FRICS Mr J Francis QPM
Date and venue of hearing : 19th October 2023 Inspection and determination on papers.
Date of Decision : 19th October 2023
DECISION
2 Decision of the tribunal The tribunal determines the rent at £900.00 per month. The rent to have effect from the 21st April 2023, the effective date of the rent increase in the Notice of Increase of Rent. Background 1. The tribunal received an [NAME] under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988, dated 1st April 2023. This included the landlord’s notice dated 3rd March 2023 proposing a new rent to commence on 21st April 2023. The previous rent being £1050.00 per month and the proposed £1300.00 per month from 21st April 2023.
2. Additionally, a copy of the tenancy agreement which showed the tenancy running from 21st October 2016 for 12 months with the last day of the contractual term being 20th October 2017. The [NAME] form at box 4 notes, the present tenancy commenced on the 21st October 2016.
3. The tenant requested an inspection and a hearing within their completed Reply Form.
4. The property is according to the [NAME] form submitted by the tenant semi-detached house with two bedrooms, a living room, a small kitchen and a small bathroom.
5. The tenancy commenced on the 21st October 2016 and ran for 12 months concluding on 20th October 2017. The last contractual period day was 20th October 2017, so the statutory periodic tenancy then commenced on the 21st October 2017. Applicant submissions.
6. The Tenant completed and submitted a Reply Form. The accommodation is described noting, mould in the kitchen, mould in bedroom 1, mould in bedroom 2 also. The landlord has provided central heating and double glazing with carpets and curtains supplied by the tenant. The property has permit parking and privates gardens. Under “improvements” it is noted that a couple of months ago the windows were changed.
3 Under “Disrepairs /Defects”, mould is noted, the radiators are very old, and they cannot heat up the living space decently. Als noted there are cracks “almost everywhere”. Under “any other comments "the nature of the area is noted and opinion that the rent is too high for the property.
7. Respondents Submission The respondent's landlord within their completed Reply Form noted they did not require an inspection. The landlord noted they supplied the double glazing and the central heating, also carpets but not curtains nor white goods. Also, that the property has permit parking and a garden. 8.The landlord noted that all single glazed windows were replaced with double glazed windows and two doors in November 2022. The landlord submitted written representations drafted by [RESPONDENT] qualified to level 3 and experienced in the London and southeast residential property markets. 9.The report identified four comparable properties ranging from £1400.00 per month to £1625.00 per month, with photographs concluding that the £1300.00 per month within the section 13 Notice was “fair and reasonable”.
The Inspection 10.The property is a semi-detached house located in a non through road. The property is Victorian in era, built with soft yellow bricks with lime mortar. The property has been covered in cement-based render and painted. The property has central heating and good quality double glazed windows throughout. The property has permit parking and a private garden. 11.There is however extensive mould within the property. The kitchen has a large section of damp wall from the ground up and the sloping roof of the kitchen is also damp and exhibits mould. The ground floor roadside room has extensive damp along the base of the exterior wall. 12.On the first floor the roadside bedroom has extensive damp on the exterior wall. Across the landing there is another room which leads to the bathroom. The first-floor bathroom has extensive damp on the outer wall to the extent that the tiles have loosened and fallen off.
4 The Hearing / determination 13. The property was inspected in the afternoon of 19th October 2023 and the matter determined on papers subsequently. The Determination 14. The tribunal is grateful for the submissions of the parties. In terms of rental evidence, the applicant noted they considered the rental level too high given the quality of the property. For the Respondent, an expert report on rental levels in the vicinity was submitted. The tribunal considering the evidence determines the rental level of the property in good condition to be £ 1500.00 per month. 15.The property from the inspect does unfortunately suffer from dampness and subsequent mould, quite extensively. The level appears in excess of that anticipated if there was inadequate use of windows and may be a more pronounced issue. Given this, the tribunal determines the rent should be adjusted, an allowance of 40% is made to reflect the extensive damp. The tribunal therefore determines a figure of £900 per month. The Law Valuation 16. Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 requires the tribunal to determine the rent at which it considered the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy. The Decision 17. Given the size and nature of the accommodation, and, using its own knowledge of the area, the tribunal determines the rent at £900.00 per month. The tribunal taking into account the submissions in respect of the effective date determines the effective date of the rent is 21st April 2023, the date in the Landlords Notice of an Increase in Rent.
5 Name: Chairman Waterhouse Date: 19th October 2023
6
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
7 THE LEGISLATION Housing Act 1988 s.13.— Increases of rent under assured periodic tenancies. (1) This section applies to— (a) a statutory periodic tenancy other than one which, by virtue of paragraph 11 or paragraph 12 in Part I of Schedule 1 to this Act, cannot for the time being be an assured tenancy; and (b) any other periodic tenancy which is an assured tenancy, other than one in relation to which there is a provision, for the time being binding on the tenant, under which the rent for a particular period of the tenancy will or may be greater than the rent for an earlier period. (2) For the purpose of securing an increase in the rent under a tenancy to which this section applies, the landlord may serve on the tenant a notice in the prescribed form proposing a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy specified in the notice, being a period beginning not earlier than— (a) the minimum period after the date of the service of the notice; and (b) except in the case of a statutory periodic [tenancy—] [ (i) in the case of an assured agricultural occupancy, the first anniversary of the date on which the first period of the tenancy began; (ii) in any other case, on the date that falls 52 weeks after the date on which the first period of the tenancy began; and ] (c) if the rent under the tenancy has previously been increased by virtue of a notice under this subsection or a determination under section 14[below—] [ (i) in the case of an assured agricultural occupancy, the first anniversary of the date on which the increased rent took effect; (ii) in any other case, the appropriate date. ] (3) The minimum period referred to in subsection (2) above is— (a) in the case of a yearly tenancy, six months; (b) in the case of a tenancy where the period is less than a month, one month; and (c) in any other case, a period equal to the period of the tenancy. [ (3A) The appropriate date referred to in subsection (2)(c)(ii) above is— (a) in a case to which subsection (3B) below applies, the date that falls 53 weeks after the date on which the increased rent took effect; (b) in any other case, the date that falls 52 weeks after the date on which the increased rent took effect. (3B) This subsection applies where— (a) the rent under the tenancy has been increased by virtue of a notice under this section or a determination under section 14 below on at least one occasion after the coming into force of the Regulatory Reform (Assured Periodic Tenancies) (Rent Increases) Order 2003; and (b) the fifty-third week after the date on which the last such increase took effect begins more than six days before the anniversary of the date on which the first such increase took effect.
8 ] (4) Where a notice is served under subsection (2) above, a new rent specified in the notice shall take effect as mentioned in the notice unless, before the beginning of the new period specified in the notice,— (a) the tenant by an [NAME] in the prescribed form refers the notice to [the appropriate tribunal] ; or (b) the landlord and the tenant agree on a variation of the rent which is different from that proposed in the notice or agree that the rent should not be varied. (5) Nothing in this section (or in section 14 below) affects the right of the landlord and the tenant under an assured tenancy to vary by agreement any term of the tenancy (including a term relating to rent).
s.14.— Determination of rent by [tribunal] . (1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to [the appropriate tribunal] a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the [appropriate tribunal]3 shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the [appropriate tribunal]3 consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In [NAME] a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and
9 (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit. [ (3A) In [NAME] a determination under this section in any case where under Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 the landlord or a superior landlord is liable to pay council tax in respect of a hereditament (“the relevant hereditament”) of which the dwelling-house forms part, the [appropriate tribunal] shall have regard to the amount of council tax which, as at the date on which the notice under section 13(2) above was served, was set by the billing authority— (a) for the financial year in which that notice was served, and (b) for the category of dwellings within which the relevant hereditament fell on that date, but any discount or other reduction affecting the amount of council tax payable shall be disregarded. (3B) In subsection (3A) above— (a) “hereditament” means a dwelling within the meaning of Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, (b) “billing authority” has the same meaning as in that Part of that Act, and (c) “category of dwellings” has the same meaning as in section 30(1) and (2) of that Act. (4) In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 , but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture [, in respect of council tax] or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1)(a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements. (5) Where any rates in respect of the dwelling-house concerned are borne by the landlord or a superior landlord, the [appropriate tribunal] shall make their determination under this section as if the rates were not so borne. (6) In any case where— (a) [the appropriate tribunal] have before them at the same time the reference of a notice under section 6(2) above relating to a tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 6 reference”) and the reference of a notice under section 13(2) above relating to the same tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 13 reference”), and (b) the date specified in the notice under section 6(2) above is not later than the first day of the new period specified in the notice under section 13(2) above, and (c) the [appropriate tribunal]9 propose to hear the two references together, the [appropriate tribunal] shall make a determination in relation to the section 6 reference before [NAME] their determination in relation to the section 13 reference and, accordingly, in such a case the reference in subsection (1)(c) above to the terms of the tenancy to which the notice relates
10 shall be construed as a reference to those terms as varied by virtue of the determination made in relation to the section 6 reference. (7) Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to [the appropriate tribunal] , then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by [the appropriate tribunal] (subject, in a case where subsection (5) above applies, to the addition of the appropriate amount in respect of rates) shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to [the appropriate tribunal] that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the committee may direct. (8) Nothing in this section requires [the appropriate tribunal] to continue with their determination of a rent for a dwelling-house if the landlord and tenant give notice in writing that they no longer require such a determination or if the tenancy has come to an end. (9) This section shall apply in relation to an assured shorthold tenancy as if in subsection (1) the reference to an assured tenancy were a reference to an assured shorthold tenancy.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent to £1,800 After Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Tenants Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Set for Assured Tenancy Based on Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Tenancy Dispute Decided by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition and Location
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property's condition is significantly poor.
- Market comparables show a lower rent.
- Rent adjustments are based on the property's condition.
- Rent adjustments consider local rental comparisons.
- Rent adjustments reflect the open market value.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal determined that the fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy should be adjusted to £900 per month.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over rent adjustment.
How did the court decide, and why?
The tribunal considered evidence of property condition and comparable rental prices in the area.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Housing Act 1988 s.14 was applied to determine fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The extensive dampness and mould issues in the property significantly impacted the decision.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision supported the tenant's position, adjusting the rent to £900 per month.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Tenants can challenge proposed rent increases if there are significant issues with property condition affecting market value.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of property condition and comparable rental prices was crucial to the decision.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can often be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for specific cases involving rent disputes.
