VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on the property's condition and amenities, setting the new rent at £1,530 per month effective from 4 December 2024.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the property's condition and amenities.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on the property's condition and amenities, ensuring the terms of the new tenancy match the original except for the rent amount.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent after considering the property's condition and amenities.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on the property's condition and amenities, setting the new rent at £1,530 per month effective from 4 December 2024.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AX/MNR/2024/0606

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [ADDRESS], Kingston upon Thames, [POSTCODE]

Judge [NAME]

Landlord [NAME] 264 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE].

Tenant Isabel Mckeown

1. The rent is: £ 1,530 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 4 December 2024

*3. The amount included for services is

negligible

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 10 July 2021

6. Length of the term or rental period Three years

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord to comply with Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation) Act 2018

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises Ground floor flat, 2 bedrooms, 1 kitchen, 1 bathroom and 1 lounge.

Chairman Judge Pittaway Date of Decision 4 December 2024

Case Reference

: LON/ooAX/MNR2024/0606

Property : [ADDRESS], [ADDRESS], Kingston upon Thames, London [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Ms [APPELLANT]

Landlord : Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] of Objection : 8 August 2024

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Judge [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 4 December 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,530 per calendar month with effect from 4 December 2024 ____________________________________

SUMMARY REASONS FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Background

1. The Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 (the ‘1988 Act’) which proposed a new rent of £2,250 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,488.57 to take effect from 10 August 2024.

2. On 8 August 2024, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 8 August 2024.

Inspection

3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant. There were no written submissions from the Landlord.

Determination and Valuation

5. This is a self-contained flat in a purpose-built block. The accommodation is comprised of two bedrooms, living room, kitchen and bathroom. In her application to the Tribunal, the tenant advised that there is no central heating, an‘old hot water tank system’ and ongoing mould problems.

6. No rental evidence was provided by either the Landlord or the Tenant and neither completed and returned the reply form attached to the directions.

7. Therefore, having consideration of the Tribunal’s own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal considers that the the open market rent for the property in its stated condition and with the stated amenities would expect to be in the region of £1,700 per calendar month.

8. The Tribunal has adjusted this rent by 10% to allow for the differences between condition of the property and that considered usual for such a letting in today’s market.

Decision

9. The Tribunal therefore determines that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy is £1,530 per calendar month.

10. Under section 14(7) of the 1988 Act, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix the starting date for the new rent from any point in time between the date set out in the notice of increase to the date that the rent is determined, if it appears to the Tribunal that the increase in rent would cause undue hardship to the tenant.

11. The Tenant submitted that she is in receipt of Universal Credit, and that it would cause her financial hardship if the increase in rent was backdated to the date of the Landlord’s notice.

12. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,530 per calendar month take effect on 4 December 2024, the Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the tenant undue hardship.

Chairman: Judge Pittaway Date: 4 December 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property's condition significantly affects the fair market rent.
  • The amenities provided in the property influence the fair market rent.
  • Improvements made by the tenant can lead to a fair market rent adjustment.
  • The tenant's ability to pay is considered in determining the fair market rent.
  • Significant insulation and ventilation issues in the property justify a rent adjustment.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal adjusted the rent for an assured periodic tenancy to £1,530 per month, effective from 4 December 2024.

Who was involved?

The tenant and landlord were involved in a dispute over the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and amenities, adjusting the proposed rent to a fair market value.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied to determine the market rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the amenities provided.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, as the rent was adjusted to a lower amount than initially proposed.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair market rent adjustment based on the property's condition and amenities.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from the tenant and the Tribunal's own expert knowledge of rental values in the area mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed if either party requests full reasons and follows the detailed appeal process.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent adjustments for assured tenancies.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.