Market Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition and Improvements
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal reduced the proposed rent from £2,800 to £2,100 per month, taking into account the condition of the property and improvements made by the tenant.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the property's condition and improvements.
📖 What the law says
This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent at which the dwelling house might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent to reflect the property's condition and improvements made by the tenant.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) adjusted the proposed rent from £2,800 to £2,100 per month, considering the property's condition and improvements made by the tenant.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
Case Reference
: LON/00AC/MNR/2023/0334
Property : 16 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [NAME] [APPELLANT] & [NAME]
Landlord : [RESPONDENT]
: [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 25 July 2023
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 11 January 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £2,100 per calendar month with effect from 28th July 2023. ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 23 June 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2,800 in place of the existing rent of £1,733.33 per month to take effect from 28 July 2023.
2. On 25 July 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection and hearing 3. A video hearing was held on 11 January at which Mr [NAME] attended and made submissions. Mr [NAME] and Mr [NAME] represented the agents [COMPANY]. Mr [NAME] provided Expert Evidence on the property on behalf of the Respondent landlord.
4. Mr [RESPONDENT] described the defects at the property and provided evidence of the improvements undertaken by him during the tenancy of the property. He did not offer any comparable market rental evidence.
5. Mr [APPELLANT] alleged that over the last 10 months or so the tenant had not permitted access to the dwelling by property maintenance staff. He claimed this was a primary cause of the dilapidation. He also claimed some of the disrepair was the result of damage caused by the tenant during their 16 or so year residency.
6. Mr [APPELLANT] told the Tribunal his report dated 10 January 2024 was compiled following a drive-by inspection of the property and he had no internal access. Mr [NAME] relied upon Mr [NAME] to provide relevant comparable market rental evidence. Three comparable transactions were offered with settlements in the range £3,200 to £2,600 per month. When questioned by Tribunal about the most appropriate comparable to rely upon in undertaking his rental valuation he said the rent achieved for [ADDRESS] in October 2023 at £2,900 per month was the best match for the property. He confirmed that his opinion of rental value for [ADDRESS] at £2,8000 per month was made after taking a wholistic view of the property. He had not made specific and discrete adjustments to reflect any differences in condition, size, location or defects between the comparable transaction properties and the property.
7. The Tribunal carried out an inspection of the property on 11 January after the conclusion of the hearing. The tenant attended the inspection but did not grant permission for attendance by the landlord or their agents.
Evidence
8. The Tribunal has had consideration of the written and oral submissions provided by the Tenant, the Landlord’s agent and Expert in their determination of the rent payable.
Determination and Valuation 9. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the Expert Valuer and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £2,900 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments to reflect tenant improvements, tenant furniture and floor coverings, any dilapidation and obsolescence at the property.
10. The full valuation is shown below:
Decision 11. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property in present condition might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £2,100 per calendar month.
12. The Tribunal directed the new rent of £2,100 to take effect on 28 July 2023. This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.
Chairman: [NAME]: 11 January 2024
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision.
If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA. You can only appeal if the First-tier Tribunal decision was wrong on one or more points of law and you must say why the First-tier Tribunal was wrong in law.
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AC/MNR/2023/0334
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 16 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME] [RESPONDENT] c/o Agent: [COMPANY], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT] & [NAME]
1. The rent is: £
2,100
Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 28th July 2023
*3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1/10/2006
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None advised
9. Description of premises A semi-detached two storey house with garden to rear and off street parking to front. There is a garage. The property is adjacent to the [ADDRESS] at the rear. The accommodation comprises: entrance hallway, lounge, dining room, kitchen, Wc, three bedrooms, WC and bathroom.
[NAME] of Decision 11 January 2024
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Proposed Rent After Considering Property Condition and Ten…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent After Considering Tenant Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent for Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Tenants Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the property's condition.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment considering any improvements made by the tenant.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the property's condition and recent improvements.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the property's condition and amenities.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property under an assured tenancy, as determined by the Tribunal.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent from £2,800 to £2,100 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and improvements made by the tenant.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the improvements made by the tenant.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may be able to negotiate a fairer rent based on the condition of the property and any improvements they've made.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The condition of the property and the improvements made by the tenant were important evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed if there are grounds to believe the decision was wrong on a point of law.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent adjustments.
