First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Tenants Based on Property Condition
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent of £1,615 per month for tenants, taking into account the property's condition and lack of certain amenities.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the property's condition and amenities.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on the property's condition and amenities, ensuring the rent reflects what a willing landlord might expect to receive in the open market.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent after considering the condition and amenities of the property.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,615 per calendar month for tenants, adjusting the proposed rent based on the property's condition and amenities.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BC/MNR/2024/0707
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 48 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Judge [NAME] (Valuer Member)
Landlord [NAME] [RESPONDENT] 7 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME] and Ms [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1,615 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 18 February 2025
*3. The amount included for services is
N/A Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 17 April 2015
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11 applies
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord One micro-oven and one television trolley
9. Description of premises Two-bedroom, two-storey mid-terrace with terrace on a c1990s estate
Chairman Judge J P Donegan Date of Decision 18 February 2025
1
Case Reference
: LON/00BC/MNR/2024/0707
Property : 48 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenants
: Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] (1) Ms [RESPONDENT] (2)
Landlord : [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 10 October 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Judge [NAME] (Valuer Member)
Date of Summary Reasons
: 18 February 2025
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,615 per calendar month with effect from 18 February 2025
© CROWN COPYRIGHT FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 16 September 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,850 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,530 per month.
2. On 10 October 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenants referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenants’ referral was received by the Tribunal on 11 October 2024.
Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties. Evidence 4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.
Determination and Valuation 5. Having considered the comparable evidence provided by the parties and using our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good condition would be in the region of £1,900 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: • 10% reduction for condition • 5% reduction for no white goods (micro-oven only) and no carpets or curtains.
6. The full valuation is shown below:
per calendar month Market Rent
£1,900.00
Less List any deductions
) Condition - 10%
) approx. 15% White goods/carpets and curtains – 5% )
285.00
£1,615.00 7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,615 per calendar month and this equates to £372.69 per calendar week.
3 Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1,615 per calendar month.
9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,615 per calendar month to take effect on 18 February 2025, being the date of this decision. The Tribunal is satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenants undue hardship.
Chairman: Judge J P Donegan
Date: 18 February 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant's Rent Reduced Due to Cladding Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Property with Unique Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Set for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent After Inspecting Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent of £1,800 for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Proposed Rent After Considering Property Condition and Ten…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property's condition significantly affects the tenant's use and enjoyment.
- Rent adjustments are based on the property's actual condition and amenities.
- Improvements made by the tenant can justify a rent adjustment.
- The tenant's ability to pay is considered in determining fair market rent.
- Landlord must provide a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new rent of £1,615 per month for tenants.
Who was involved?
The case involved tenants and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and amenities, reducing the proposed rent accordingly.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition and amenities of the property.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenants.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair market rent adjustment based on their property's condition and amenities.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions from both parties and expert knowledge of rental values in the area were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed within a month of receiving the summary reasons.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
