First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair market rent for a property, considering the condition of the house and the amenities provided. They adjusted the rent down from the landlord's proposal due to issues like cracked doors and water damage.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the condition of the property and the amenities provided.
📖 What the law says
This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a market rent for a property based on the condition and amenities provided.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a market rent of £825.00 per month for a property based on the condition and amenities provided, adjusting for outstanding repairs and tenant-provided white goods.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
Case Reference
: BIR/41UK/MNR/2024/0634
Property : 6 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenants
: [RESPONDENT] & [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord : [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord’s agent : [NAME] of Application : Determination of a Market Rent under sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : [NAME] [NAME]. Arb
Date of Decision : 28 June 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £825.00 per calendar month with effect from 30 November 2024. ____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Background
1. On 29 October 2024, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 (“the Act”) which proposed a new rent of £950.00 per calendar month (pcm), in place of the existing rent of £725.oo pcm, to take effect from 30 November 2024. The original tenancy commenced on 30 October 2021.
2. By an application received on 30 October 2024, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Act, the Tenants referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection
3. The Tribunal has not carried out an inspection of the Property. Accordingly, the Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and having regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research.
The Property
4. The Tenant returned the Tribunal’s Reply forms. These combined with the Tribunal’s own research, confirmed essential details of the Property as a two-storey house with gas central heating and double glazing with the following accommodation:
GF Two living rooms, kitchen; FF Two bedrooms, bathroom;
Externally two car parking spaces.
The Property is located in a courtyard development situated off [ADDRESS] and [ADDRESS] approximately 1 mile to the west of Tamworth town centre.
The Tenants indicated that the Landlord provided carpets to the Property whilst they provided the white goods.
Evidence
The Tenants
5. The Tenants’ submissions indicated the following outstanding repairs noted at an inspection on 19 September (presumably 2024):
Cracked front UPVC door. Two missing tiles on roof
3 Leak under bath. Water damaged ceiling in dining room Water damage in WC Threadbare carpets rippled with no underlay exposing gripper rods. Gaps in the tops of windows in lounge and dining room not completely sealed causing draught.
6. In addition, the Tenants included extracts from the Rightmove Property Portal showing six properties within the Tamworth area with at least two bedrooms. Of these five were in the range £875.00 to £900.00 pcm, with the sixth at £700.00 pcm.
The Landlord
7. The Landlord did not provide any submissions.
Determination and Valuation
8. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal considers that the majority of achieved rentals appear to be in the order of £825.00 to £900.00 pcm. There is evidence of rentals over £900.00 pcm but that appears to relate to properties with their own parking areas rather than allocated spaces within a courtyard as appears to be for subject. Therefore, the Tribunal adopts, as a starting point, the rental of £900.00 pcm for the Property.
9. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made adjustments in relation to the following:
a) Condition – as identified by the Tenants above. b) White goods as provided by the Tenants. c) Tenants’ decorating liability at 5%.
The full valuation is shown below:
pcm Market Rent
£900.00
Less a) Items given under a) above
£20.00
b) Items given under b) above
£10.00
c) Items given under c) above
£45.00
£75.00
Say
£825.00
4 Decision
17. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £825.00 with effect from 30 November 2024.
Chairman: [NAME]
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
5
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/41UK/MNR/2024/0634
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were. 6 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME]. [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] [NAME] [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Tenants [NAME] & [NAME]
1. The rent is: £825.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 30 November 2024
3. The amount included for services is not applicable
Per
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 30 October 2021 5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord and Tenants Act 1985 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord
8. Description of premises House with 2 bedrooms
[NAME] of Decision 28 June 2025
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Tenants Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent for Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines New Market Rent for Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Adjustment for Tenancy Dispute - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Residential Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Residential Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal adjusted the rent downwards due to the property's condition, as noted by the tenants.
- The rent was reduced because the tenants provided the white goods for the property.
- A 5% reduction was applied to the rent due to the tenants' liability for decorating.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a market rent of £825.00 per month for the property.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the condition of the property and the amenities provided, adjusting the rent accordingly.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property and the need for repairs were the most important arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and any necessary repairs when negotiating rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the property's condition and comparable rental prices in the area mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on a point of law.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
