Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Tenancy
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided on a new market rent for a property, considering recent improvements and the overall condition of the home. The new rent will take effect from November 6th, 2024.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property, adjusted for the property's condition and improvements.
📖 What the law says
This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering its condition and any improvements.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a new market rent for a property based on comparable evidence and adjustments for the property's condition.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new market rent of £730 pcm for a property, adjusting for improvements and condition, based on comparable evidence and expert knowledge.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
Case Reference
: BIR/00GG/MNR/2024/0622
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [APPELLANT] of application : 3 October 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : V Ward [NAME] B.Sc.(Est.Man.)[NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 20/01/2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £730.00 per calendar month with effect from 6 November 2024. ____________________________________
S E C FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Background
1. On 20 September 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the
Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £730.00 per calendar month
(pcm) in place of the existing rent of £550.00 pcm to take effect from 6
November 2024.
2. On 3 October 2024, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant
referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for
determination of a market rent.
Inspection
3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and having regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research.
Evidence
4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the
Landlord. There were no written submissions from the Tenant.
5. From the information provided and available, the subject property appears to
comprise a modern 3-bedroom terraced house with off road parking which
benefits from central heating and double glazing.
6. The Landlord confirmed that they had installed gas central heating to the
property in 2019 and had carried out other improvements including works to
the kitchen. In terms of rental evidence, the Landlord had provided a letter from
[NAME] which indicated that 3-bedroom properties in the
vicinity of the subject would let an rentals in the order of £800.00 and £950.00
pcm but taking into account the current condition of the property, the market
rental would be between £825.00 and £850.00 pcm.
Determination and Valuation
7. Having considered the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our
own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the
open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the
region of £900.00 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made
adjustments in relation to:
a) General dilapidations since the property was first let in 2014
3 b) Older kitchen and bathroom fittings c) Curtains provided by tenant
8. The full valuation is shown below:
per month Market Rent
£900.00
Less a) Items given under a) above
£100.00
b) Items given under b) above
£60.00 c) Items given under b) above
£10.00 £170.00
£730.00
Decision
9. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property
might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord
under an assured tenancy was £730.00 per calendar month.
10. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £730.00 pcm to take effect on 6 November
2024. This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.
Chairman: V Ward
Date: 6 January 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
4 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00GG/MNR/2024/0622
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
V Ward [NAME] B.Sc.(Est.Man.)[NAME]
[APPELLANT]
[NAME]
1. The rent is: £730.00 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 6 November 2024
3. The amount included for services is not applicable - Per -
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 6 October 2014 5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises Modern terraced house with 3 bedrooms
Chairman V Ward Date of Decision 6 January 2025
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines New Market Rent for Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Small Bungalow
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Residential Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Disputed Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the property's condition.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on the condition and improvements of the property.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the condition of the property and the amenities provided.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property, adjusted for its condition and amenities.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent after adjustments for the property's condition and amenities.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new market rent of £730 pcm for the property.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on comparable evidence and adjustments for the property's condition and improvements.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparable evidence provided by the landlord.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than initially proposed by the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should gather comparable evidence to support their case for a fair market rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Comparable evidence and documentation regarding the property's condition and improvements mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on a point of law arising from this decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determinations.
