VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Market Rent Determination for Residential Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new market rent for a residential property. They set the rent at £440.00 per month, considering the property's condition and recent improvements. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on the condition and improvements of the property.

Topics

market rent determinationtenancy conditions

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy, subject to specific timing requirements.

Housing Act 1988 s.14

A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy, provided that the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and more than six months have not elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new market rent for a residential property based on the condition and improvements made.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new market rent of £440.00 per month for a residential property based on the condition and improvements made since 2020. The decision was based on the Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

Case Reference

: BIR/00CN/MNR/2025/0628

Property : Flat 1, 7 [NAME] upon Trent [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [NAME]

Landlord’s agent : [RESPONDENT] of Application : Determination of a Market Rent under sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : [NAME]

Judge David R Salter

Date of Decision : 15 August 2025

Date of Issue

: 08 September 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £440.00 per calendar month with effect from 17 February 2025. ____________________________________

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

REASONS FOR THE DECISION

Background

1. On 14 January 2025, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 (“the Act”) which proposed a new rent of £450.00 per calendar month ([NAME]), in place of the existing rent of £400.00 [NAME], to take effect from 17 February 2025. The original tenancy commenced in June 2006.

2. By an application received on 10 February 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Act, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

Inspection

3. The Tribunal has not carried out an inspection of the Property. Neither party requested an oral hearing. Accordingly, the Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and having regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research.

The Property

4. Both the Tenant and the Landlord returned the Tribunal’s Reply forms. These combined with the Tribunal’s own research, confirmed essential details of the Property as a ground floor flat, formed as a conversion out of a terraced house, offering the following accommodation which benefits from central heating and double glazing.

GF Living room, bedroom, kitchen and bathroom.

The Property is situated just to the south of Burton on Trent town centre and within walking distance of the same.

The Tenant indicated that the Landlord provided carpets to the Property whilst they provided the white goods with the exception of the cooker.

Evidence

The Tenant

5. The Tenant’s submissions explained that they had occupied the Property since 2006 and for the earlier part of their tenure, the condition of the property was poor. They themselves had purchased the washing machine and in 2019, replaced the

3 bath at their own expense. Continuing, the Tenant indicated that following the purchase of the Property by the current Landlord in 2020, the Property has undergone multiple improvements, some of which were at the suggestion of the Local Authority. However, in summary there are still issues with the Property and whilst many of these are cosmetic, the following are outstanding:

 Leaking Guttering  Condensation. The Landlord has provided a dehumidifier as a temporary solution for this problem.

The Tenant had provided some photographs however there was no background given as to what parts of the Property these related to and also whether there were taken before or after the improvements were carried out.

6. In respect of the rent, the Tenant stated that the proposed increase amounts to “£600.00 per annum” without any improvement to the quality of the Property or services provided by the Letting Agency. The Tenant concludes by saying that the total rent for the building is higher than that on average for a similar Property in the area.

7. The Tenant provided very brief details of two other properties as comparable evidence. One was a one-bedroom flat in Normanton offered at £425.00 [NAME] whilst the other a one-bedroom flat above a shop in another part of the town at £395.00 [NAME]. An extract from what appeared to a local authority guidance on the cost of private renting was also provided which gave the cost of a one-bedroom home at between £350.00 to £480.00 [NAME].

The Landlord

8. The Landlord confirmed that since 2020, they had carried out many improvements including the following:

 New windows and doors.  New bathroom.  New floor coverings.  Redecoration

Invoices were provided in respect of some items. The Landlord had also provided some photographs however these also gave no background as to whether they were taken before or after the improvements were carried out.

9. In respect of the rent, the Landlord stated that the proposed increase would only be the second increase in 5 years and further, over 19 years, the rent had only increased by £125.00 [NAME].

4

Determination and Valuation

10. The Tribunal would initially state that the pattern of, and previous increases in rental, are not relevant in its determination of the market rent.

11. Of the comparables provided by the Tenant, the Tribunal notes that the Normanton property is located over 10 miles away whilst the other appears to be situated over a shop, neither are therefore particularly useful. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal considers that the majority of achieved rentals appear to be in the order of £500.00 to £595.00 [NAME] for this type of Property. There is evidence of rentals over £600.00 [NAME] but many of these appears to relate to purpose built properties some with their own parking areas. Considering the Property’s location on a street of terraced housing in a town centre location, the Tribunal adopts, as a starting point, the rental of £500.00 [NAME] for the Property.

12. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made adjustments in relation to the following:

a) Condition – as identified by the Tenant above. b) White goods as provided by the Tenant. c) Tenant’s decorating liability at 5%.

The full valuation is shown below:

[NAME]

£500.00

Less a) Items given under a) above

£25.00

b) Items given under b) above

£10.00

c) Items given under c) above

£25.00

£60.00

Say

£440.00

Decision

12. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £440.00 with effect from 17 February 2025.

5 Chairman: [NAME]

If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

6

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CN/MNR/2025/0628

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were. Flat 1, 7 [NAME] upon Trent [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Judge D R Salter

Landlord [NAME]

Tenant

[APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £440.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 17 February 2025

3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced June 2006 5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

8. Description of premises Flat with 1 bedroom

[NAME] of Decision 15 August 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined a market rent of £440.00 per calendar month.
  • The property's condition, including outstanding issues like leaking guttering and condensation, reduced its market rent.
  • The tenant providing white goods, except for the cooker, reduced the market rent.
  • The tenant's decorating liability of 5% reduced the market rent.
  • The Tribunal used a starting point of £500.00 per month for similar properties in the area.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord's argument about the pattern of previous rent increases was irrelevant to determining market rent.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on a new market rent of £440.00 per month for a residential property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and recent improvements made by the landlord.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition and improvements of the property were the most important arguments.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition and improvements of their property when negotiating rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs and invoices of improvements were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on a point of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for specific legal advice.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.