Tribunal Sets New Rent of £950 Per Month
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided on a new rent of £950 per month for a property after the tenant requested a determination under the Housing Act 1988. The decision was based on the current market conditions and the property's features.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have a new market rent determined by the Tribunal under Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
📖 What the law says
This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. It allows landlords to serve a notice proposing a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy, provided the notice is served in the prescribed form and meets certain timing requirements.
A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy, except if the rent is pursuant to a previous determination under this section or more than six months have elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy. The tribunal then determines the open-market rent based on various conditions.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a new market rent for a property under Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new market rent of £950 per month for a property under Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988, after considering the tenant's application and relevant factors.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
Case Reference
: BIR/00CS/MNR/2025/0609
Property : 134 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [APPELLANT] – [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [NAME]
Landlord’s agent : [NAME] of Application : Determination of a Market Rent under sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : V Ward BSc Hons FRICS
N [NAME]
Date of Decision : 29 August 2025
Date of Issue
: 11 September 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £950.00 per calendar month with effect from 1 February 2025. ____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Background
1. The Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 (“the Act”) which proposed a new rent of £975.00 per calendar month (pcm), in place of the existing rent of £575.00 pcm, to take effect from 1 February 2025. The original tenancy commenced on 4 October 2018.
2. By an application received on 11 March 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Act, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
3. There were initially concerns over the validity of the notice however following submissions from the Landlord, the Tribunal satisfied itself as to the validity of the notice sufficient for its jurisdiction to be engaged.
Inspection
4. The Tribunal has not carried out an inspection of the Property. Neither party requested an oral hearing. Accordingly, the Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and having regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research.
The Property
5. The application form combined with the Tribunal’s own research, confirmed essential details of the Property as a terraced house standing in an elevated position relative to the roadway, offering the following accommodation:
Two living rooms, kitchen, three bedrooms, kitchen bathroom and toilet.
Outside: Forecourt and gardens.
The Property is situated approximately four miles to the west of Birmingham City centre. There are amenities available with close proximity of the subject Property.
Evidence
6. Neither the Tenant nor the Landlord returned the Tribunal’s Reply forms however the Tenant stated in their application form that they had decorated the Property several times and kept the same in good condition. They also stated that there was
3 a mould problem in one of the living rooms but they had purchased a dehumidifier to limit any further damage.
Determination and Valuation
7. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal considers that the majority of achieved rentals appear to be in the order of £1000.00 pcm for this type of Property. Considering the Property relative to the comparable information available, the Tribunal adopts this rental as a starting point.
8. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made adjustments in relation to the following:
a) Tenant’s decorating liability at 5%.
The full valuation is shown below:
pcm Market Rent
£1000.00
Less a) Items given under a) above
£50.00
£50.00
Say
£950.00
Decision
12. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £950.00 with effect from 1 February 2025.
Chairman: V Ward
APPEAL PROVISIONS
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
4
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CU/MNR/2025/0632
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were. 19 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
V Ward BSc Hons FRICS N Atherton MRICS Dip Rating
Landlord [NAME]
Tenant
[APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £950.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 February 2025
3. The amount included for services is not applicable
Per
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 4 October 2018 5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord
8. Description of premises Terraced house with three bedrooms.
5 Chairman V Ward Date of Decision 29 August 2025
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Residential Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Proposed Rent After Considering Tenant Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Tenant Considering Property Condition and…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines New Market Rent for Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on comparable properties.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment taking into account the property's condition.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment considering any financial hardship.
- The tenant is entitled to have a new market rent determined by the Tribunal under sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant's request for a new market rent was dismissed when the proposed rent did not align with comparable evidence.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new market rent of £950 per month for the property.
Who was involved?
The tenant requested a determination of the market rent, and the landlord proposed a new rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the current market conditions and the property's features, adjusting for the tenant's responsibilities.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the proposed rent with the current market rents for similar properties.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider applying to the Tribunal for a determination of the market rent if they believe the proposed rent is unfair.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence and documents that mattered included the application form, the landlord's notice, and the Tribunal's own research on comparable rental values.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.
