Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent for Tenancy Based on Property Condition
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the proposed market rent for a tenancy after considering the property's condition, amenities, and comparable properties in the area. The final rent was set at £800 per month.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent after adjustments for the property's condition and amenities.
📖 What the law says
This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent, considering various factors including the terms of the existing tenancy and any improvements made by the tenant.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed market rent based on the property's condition and amenities.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed market rent of £825 to £800 per month after considering the property's condition, amenities, and comparable properties in the area.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Dismissed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
Case Reference
: BIR/OOCW/MNR/2025/0648
Property : 4 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [APPELLANT] [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME] [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord : [RESPONDENT] & [NAME]
Landlord’s agent : [NAME] of application : 7th March 2025
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mrs [NAME] of Decision : 7th August 2025
Date of Issue
: 8th September 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £800.00 per month with effect from 28th April 20254 ____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background
1. On 26th February 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £825.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £750.00 to take effect from 28th April 2025.
2. On 7th March 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection
3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and having regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research.
Evidence
4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the landlord and the tenant.
5. From the information provided it appears that the subject property is a mid- terraced house, briefly comprising of two living rooms and kitchen on the ground floor. On the first floor the landing leads to three bedrooms and a bathroom. There is also a store. The property is understood to have double glazing and gas fired central heating.
6. Carpets are understood to be provided by the landlord. Curtains and some white goods are provided by the tenants.
7. Extensive submissions have been provided to us dealing with numerous matters from repairs and previous Tribunal Decisions to an earlier Court Hearing. Not all of these are relevant to our decision.
8. There are allegations and counter allegations regarding the condition of the property. There are also submissions from the landlord regarding works completed since they inherited the house in 2016 but having considered these, the Tribunal considers them to be in the nature of ongoing general maintenance and repair.
9. Based on the submissions received it is evident to the Tribunal that the property would benefit from ongoing maintenance and upgrading. In particular there is
3 a Structural Engineers Report which confirms that there is evidence of some movement to the property together with attention being required to defective rendering and works to areas of the roof. It appears to the Tribunal that there is also evidence of water ingress.
10. It is clear to the Tribunal that the property is generally poorly presented and that the kitchen and bathroom are not of a modern standard. The Tribunal is not persuaded that the tenants have made any significant improvements to the property which merits any adjustment in the Tribunal’s determination of the market rental.
11. The landlord submitted numerous examples of ‘comparable properties’ marketed on Rightmove which the Tribunal have considered.
Determination and Valuation
12. Having considered the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £1,100.00 per month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:
a) Condition 1) Cracking to rendering and water ingress 120.00 2) Dated kitchen and bathroom 65.00 3) Roof overhaul/replacement required 80.00 Total £265.00
b) Curtains and white goods fitted by the tenant. £35.00
13. The full valuation is shown below:
Market Rent
£1,100.00 per month
Less a) Items given under a) above
£265.00
b) Items given under b) above
£ 35.00 £300.00
Rent £800.00 per month Decision
12. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property
might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME]
under an assured tenancy was £800.00 per month with effect from 28th April 2025.
4
Chairman: [NAME]: 7th August 2025 APPEAL PROVISIONS
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
5
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 4 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mrs [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [NAME] [RESPONDENT] & [NAME] [RESPONDENT] c/o [NAME] 568 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME], [APPELLANT] [NAME] and [NAME] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £800.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 28th April 2025
3. The amount included for services N/A Per
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 28th April 2025 5. Length of the term or rental period Periodic 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None 8. Description of premises A mid-terraced house comprising two living rooms, kitchen, three bedrooms and bathroom. Gas central heating and double glazing.
Chairman [NAME] of Decision 7th August 2025
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No.
BIR/OOCW/MNR/2025/0648
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Granted Due to Financial Hardship
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property in Poor Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Tenancy Dispute
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The rent must be reasonable and supported by comparables.
- The market rent is assessed based on evidence and expert knowledge of rental values in the area.
- Rent adjustments are made based on the condition of the property and recent improvements.
- Financial hardship can influence the decision on rent adjustment.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The rent adjustment did not sufficiently consider comparable rental prices in the area.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed market rent for a tenancy based on the property's condition and amenities.
Who was involved?
The case involved a tenant and a landlord, with the landlord proposing a new rent and the tenant referring the matter to the Tribunal.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to adjust the proposed market rent downward, taking into account the property's condition and amenities.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and bcm14 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the need for ongoing maintenance and upgrades.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the tenant, as the rent was adjusted downward.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure their property is well-maintained and up-to-date to avoid rent adjustments.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions from both parties, a structural engineer's report, and comparable property data were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on any point of law arising from this decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determinations.
