VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new market rent for a property after considering comparable evidence and adjusting for items provided by the landlord. The new rent is £1,200.00 per month starting from 15th March 2025.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a market rent determination based on comparable properties and adjustments for provided items.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under this section, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering similar tenancies and conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a new market rent for a property based on comparable evidence and adjustments.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new market rent for a property based on comparable evidence and adjustments for items provided by the landlord. The rent was set at £1,200.00 per month effective from 15th March 2025.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT Case Reference : BIR/00CN/MNR/2025/0618 Property : 43 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : [NAME] [APPELLANT] Landlord : [APPELLANT] of application : 12th February 2025 Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mrs [NAME] of Decision : 17th July 2025 _______________________________________________

DECISION The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,200.00 per month with effect from 15th March 2025. ____________________________________ FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

REASONS FOR THE

DECISION Background 1. On 20th January 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,200.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £950.00 to take effect from 15th March 2025.

2. On 12th February 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and having regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research. Evidence 4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Landlord.

5. From the information provided it appears that the property comprises of a semi-detached house. The accommodation is understood to comprise of one living room, kitchen, two double bedrooms, one single bedroom and bathroom.

6. The landlord submits that the house has central heating and double glazing. Carpets and curtains are provided by the landlord with white goods being provided by the tenant. It is submitted that repairs have been completed. It is acknowledged by the tenant in the application that repairs were completed on 11th February 2025.

7. The landlord submits the following comparable evidence: a) [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] – a similar property recently let by the landlord at £1,300.00 per month. b) Properties at [ADDRESS], Birmingham, [ADDRESS], [ADDRESS], Birmingham, [ADDRESS], Birmingham and [ADDRESS] which are all similar and within 3 miles of the subject property being marketed at rentals between £1,250.00 - £1,600.00 per month. Determination and Valuation 8. Having considered the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the

3 region of £1,250.00 per month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: a) White goods fitted by the Tenant.

9. The full valuation is shown below: Market Rent £1,250.00 per month Less a) Items given under a) above £50.00 £1,200.00 Decision 12. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1,200.00 per month with effect from 15th March 2025. Chairman: G S Freckelton FRICS Date: 17th July 2025 APPEAL PROVISIONS If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

4 Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination) Housing Act 1988 Section 14 Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 43 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Mr G S Freckelton FRICS Mrs [RESPONDENT] Landlord [RESPONDENT] 774 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £1,200.00 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 15th March 2025 3. The amount included for services N/A Per 4. Date assured tenancy commenced 15th November 2023 5. Length of the term or rental period 6 months 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None 8. Description of premises A semi-detached house comprising, one living room, kitchen, three bedrooms and bathroom. Double glazing. Central heating. Garden Chairman G S Freckelton FRICS Date of Decision 17th July 2025 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/OOCN/2025/0618

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent must be based on comparable properties.
  • The rent should consider the property's condition.
  • Adjustments for recent improvements are considered valid.
  • Financial hardship can influence the rent decision.
  • Tenant's obligations and contributions are factored in.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • Adjustments solely based on the tenant's obligations led to dismissal.
  • Rent adjustments without considering the property's condition were dismissed.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new market rent of £1,200.00 per month for the property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the market rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable evidence and adjusted for items provided by the landlord.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The comparable evidence provided by the landlord was crucial in determining the market rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should gather comparable evidence to support their case.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable evidence of similar properties and adjustments for provided items were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on any point of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for specific legal issues.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.