Tribunal Reduces Proposed Rent After Considering Property Condition and Tenant Improvements
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal reduced the proposed rent after considering the property's condition and improvements made by the tenant. The final rent was set at £875 per month.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the property's condition and improvements made by the tenant.
📖 What the law says
This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent at which the dwelling house might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent after considering the property's condition and improvements made by the tenant.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) reduced the proposed rent from £1,325 to £875 per month after considering the property's condition and improvements made by the tenant.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
Case Reference
: BIR/00CN/MNR/2024/0624
Property : [ADDRESS], Birmingham. [POSTCODE]
Tenant : [NAME] [APPELLANT] & [NAME]
Landlord : Unknown
Landlord’s agent : [RESPONDENT] of application : 6th October 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : [NAME]. [NAME]. [NAME]. MRICS
Date of Decision : 13 March 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £875.00 per month with effect from 14th February 2025 ____________________________________
S E C FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background
1. On 13th September 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,325 per month in place of the existing rent of £725 per month to take effect from 15th October 2024.
2. On 6th October 2024, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of the market rent.
Inspection
3. The Tribunal inspected the property at 10.00am on 14th February 2025 in the company of the Tenants [NAME] & [NAME] and thereafter considered the case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties having regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research.
Evidence
4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the parties. From the information provided and on inspecting the subject property it is noted that the property in question comprises a two-bedroom, semi-detached residence with accommodation including entrance hallway, living room, kitchen and on the 1st floor, landing, bathroom and 2 bedrooms. The property with paved parking area to front and lawned garden to rear benefits from gas fired central heating and uPVC double glazing however suffers from elements of disrepair including moisture ingress, a number of missing internal doors and general wear and tear both internally and externally.
5. The Tribunal was informed by the Tenant that they had replaced areas of carpeting, installed wall units in the kitchen together with a handheld shower attachment to the bath. Further, the Tribunal was informed that although the white goods belonged to the tenant the electric cooker which had recently been replaced, and the hob were a Landlord’s fixture.
6. The Landlord’s agent in their submission provided the Tribunal with comparable evidence outlining property rents ranging from £1200 to £1350 per calendar month together with details of the recent letting of [ADDRESS] at £1100 per calendar month which they considered to be of a similar size, with no driveway and located in a less prestigious area. Additional comparable information of two-bedroom properties ranging from £850-£1150 per calendar month was submitted to the Tribunal.
3
The Tribunal also noted in his email of 28 May 2024 “[COUNSEL] of [RESPONDENT] (Agent for the Landlord) suggested that a rent of £1000 would be acceptable.
Determination and Valuation
7. Having due regard to the comparable evidence provided by the parties and attributed such weight as we deem appropriate to each and taking into consideration our own expert knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £1,000 per month.
From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:
a) The property condition b) Improvements carried out by the Tenant c) Curtains, carpets and white goods fitted by the Tenant d) The Tenant’s liability to redecorate.
8. The full valuation is shown below: Per month
Market Rent
£1,000
Less a) Items given under a) above
£50
b) Items given under b) above
£25 c) Items given under c) above
£25
d) Tenant’s internal decoration liability £25 £125
£125
Say £875
4 Decision
12. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £875 per month with effect from 15th October 2024.
Hardship
9. The Tenant raises the matter of hardship in their submissions accordingly the Tribunal directs the new rent of £875 per month is to take effect from 14th February 2025.
Chairman: [NAME]: 14th February 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
5
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS]. [POSTCODE]
[NAME]. [RESPONDENT]. [RESPONDENT]. MRICS
Landlord Unknown Address Landlord’s [RESPONDENT], [ADDRESS], Sparkhill, Birmingham. [POSTCODE]
Tenant
1. The rent is: £875 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is:
3. The amount included for services is not applicable
Per
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 15th January 2023 5. Length of the term or rental period 6 months 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord
8. Description of premises 2-bedroom centrally heated and double-glazed semi-detached house with parking to front and gardens to the rear
[NAME] of Decision 14th February 2025
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No.
BIR/00CN/MNR/2024/0624
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition and Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent After Considering Tenant Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent for Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Tenants Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Adjustment for Tenancy Dispute - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Adjusted Market Rent After Improving Property Conditions
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property's existing condition, including moisture and missing doors, justified a rent reduction.
- Tenant-installed kitchen wall units and carpeting contributed to a lower market rent.
- The tenant's liability for internal redecoration was a factor in reducing the rent.
- The Tribunal considered its own knowledge of local rental values when determining the market rent.
- The tenant's claim of hardship led to a delayed start date for the new rent.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's proposed rent of £1,325 per month was not accepted by the Tribunal.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided to reduce the proposed rent from £1,325 to £875 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord's agent were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and improvements made by the tenant.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the improvements made by the tenant.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and any improvements they've made when disputing a rent increase.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence included the condition of the property, improvements made by the tenant, and comparable rental prices.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
