Rent Adjustment for Tenancy Dispute Decided by First-tier Tribunal
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the rent to £935 per month, reducing the landlord's proposed rent of £960 to consider the tenant's maintenance issues and the property's condition.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment considering the condition of the property and comparable market rents.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the rent to £935 per month, reducing the landlord's proposed rent of £960 to account for maintenance issues.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £935 per month for a tenant, reducing the landlord's proposed rent of £960 to account for maintenance issues and property condition.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CU/MNR/2023/0143
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 3 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT], 145 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [APPELLANT] & [NAME] [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £935.00 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 23 June 2023
3. The amount included for services is not applicable
Per
4. Date assured tenancy commenced July 2020
5. Length of the term or rental period Calendar monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11 Landlord & Tenant Act 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None.
8. Description of premises Modern three bedroom terraced house within housing estate.
[NAME] of Decision 14 March 2024
1
Case Reference : BIR/00CU/MNR/2023/0143
Property
: 3 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : Appeal against a Notice proposing a new rent under an
Assured Periodic Tenancy under section 13(4) of the Housing
Act 1988
Tribunal Members : [NAME].[NAME]. [NAME] [NAME].(Est.Man.) [NAME] [NAME]. [NAME]. [NAME] and Venue of : N/A. Decision on papers. Hearing
Date of Decision : 14 March 2024
____________________________________________________________
REASONS
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
1 The rent is determined at £935 (Nine Hundred and Thirty Five Pounds) per calendar month from 24 June 2023.
REASONS
Introduction
2 The Applicants hold an Assured monthly tenancy that commenced in July 2020.
3 On 12 May 2023 the Respondent served notice of increase under section 13(2) of The Housing Act 1988 ('the Act') proposing a new rent of £960 per calendar month in place of the previous rent of £785 per month to take effect on 24 June 2023. The rent did not include any Council Tax, water charges or service charges.
4 On 21 June 2023 the Applicants applied for the rent to be determined by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber). Neither party requested a Hearing.
5 On 4 September 2023 the Tribunal issued Directions and issued revised Directions on 27 November 2023.
6 On 14 March 2024 the Tribunal determined the rent at £935 per calendar month with effect from 24 June 2023.
7 On 22 March 2024 the Applicants requested reasons for the Tribunal’s decision.
The Law
8 Section 14 of The Housing Act 1988 states:
'(1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy -
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to
which the notice relates;
(b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice;
(c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as
those of the tenancy to which the notice relates;...'
'(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded -
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant;
(b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant
improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the
tenant, if the improvement-
(i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to the
immediate landlord ...
9 The jurisdiction of the Rent Assessment Committee was transferred to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) on 1 July 2013.
3
Facts Found
10 The Tribunal did not inspect the property. It therefore relied on the evidence submitted by the parties and its own general knowledge of rents in the area in reaching its Decision.
11 In the papers, the property is described as a new-build, three bedroom terraced house in a modern housing estate in Darlaston, West Midlands. It has central heating, double glazing, carpets, curtains and white goods provided by the landlord. It has off road parking and private gardens.
Submissions
12 The Applicants' Submission
The Applicants detailed a history of problems with a shower and other defects including damage to laminate flooring, kitchen cupboards and plaster cracks that were the landlord's responsibility. They submitted a budget showing their monthly income of £4,294 which is equivalent to £51,528 p.a., and monthly expenses of £4,084 (£49,008 p.a. ) which they said left them £210 per month. They proposed a new rent of £885 per month.
13 The Respondent's Submission
The Respondents sent details of several houses to let in the area at rents similar to and in excess of the rent requested at the subject property, including:
1) a new -build, three bedroom end-terraced house in [ADDRESS], Bilston,
advertised at £1,195 pcm;
2) a three bedroom semi-detached house in [ADDRESS], Bilston, advertised at £1,150
pcm;
3) a three bedroom semi-detached house at [ADDRESS], Wednesbury, previously
advertised at £1,100 pcm;
4) a three bedroom semi-detached house at St.George's St., Wednesbury, previously
advertised at £1,100 pcm;
5) a three bedroom semi-detached house at Ward's Keep, Wednesbury, previously
advertised at £1,095 pcm
together with a schedule of 13 other houses in the local area, all let at figures in excess of the £960 pcm requested.
Decision
14 Having considered the submitted evidence and rents of comparable houses in the area, the Tribunal found the market rental value in good condition would have been £960 per calendar month. However, the Tribunal reduced the rent by £25 per month to reflect the maintenance items referred to by the Applicants.
15 The Tribunal considered the Applicants' budget with a declared income of £51,528 per annum but found there were insufficient grounds to justify altering the effective date of increase from the date in the Respondent's Notice of 24 June 2023 due to hardship.
16 Accordingly, the Tribunal determined the rent at £935.00 per calendar month under Section 14 of The Housing Act 1988 with effect from the date in the Respondent's Notice,
24 June 2023.
[NAME] [NAME].(Est.Man.) FRICS
Chairman
4
Appeal
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision an application may be made to this Tribunal for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal, Property Chamber (Residential Property) on a point of law only. Any such application must be received within 28 days after the decision and accompanying reasons have been sent to the parties (Rule 52 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Fair Rent for Flat in New Cross
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Fair Rent to £660 Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent at £800 for Semi-Detached House
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decis…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1,250 Per Month
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal considered comparable market rents for similar properties in the area.
- The Tribunal reduced the rent to account for maintenance issues mentioned by the tenants.
- The property was described as a new-build, three-bedroom terraced house in a modern housing estate.
- The property included central heating, double glazing, carpets, curtains, and white goods provided by the landlord.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the rent at £935 per month, reducing the landlord's proposed rent of £960.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in a rent adjustment dispute.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to reduce the rent to £935 per month because of maintenance issues reported by the tenant.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The tenant's argument regarding the property's condition and maintenance issues was crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should report any maintenance issues to the tribunal to potentially lower the rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the property's condition and comparable market rents were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, an appeal can be made to the Upper Tribunal on a point of law only.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
