First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977. They considered the market rent and scarcity to determine the fair rent, which was set at £168.00 per week.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined according to the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering the market rent, scarcity, and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The decision was made on 20 July 2022.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AP/F77/2022/0078
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME]
Landlord [APPELLANT]
Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £168.00 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 20 July 2022
3. The amount for services is
Per
negligible/not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
Per
negligible/not applicable
5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £ .................................................................................................................................................................... per .................................. including £ ...................... per ................................ for services (variable).
(b) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ 199.50 .......................... per week ................................................................................................................ including £ ......................................... per ................................ for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.
Chairman A [NAME] of decision 20 July 2022
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 340
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 292.7
X 340 Minus Y 292.7 = (A) 47.3
(A) 47.3 Divided by Y 292.7 = (B) 0.1615989
First [NAME] for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.211599
Last registered rent* 164.50 Multiplied by (C) = 199.31 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = 199.50
Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £199.50 Per week
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present [NAME] was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent [NAME] since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the
variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the [NAME] of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AP/F77/2022/0078
HMCTS code :
P: PAPERREMOTE
Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Landlord : Northumberland & Durham Property Trust Limited Representative : In House Tenant : Mrs [COUNSEL] : In Person Type of [NAME] : Determination of a fair rent under section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 Tribunal Members :
Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Decision :
20 July 2022
Date of Reasons : 20 July 2022
REASONS
Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing
This has been a remote hearing on the papers. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE. The Directions dated 30 April 2021 set out that the tribunal was not able to hold face to face hearings or carry out internal inspections. The decision made is described at the end of these reasons.
Background
1. On 3 March 2022, the Landlord applied for registration of a fair rent of £190.82 per week.
2. The Rent Officer registered a rent of £170.00 per week. The rent was registered on 30 March 2022 and is effective from 1 June 2022. The rent registered was the s70 rent which was below the capped rent of £190.00 per week.
3. Accommodation is self-contained first floor converted flat in a late Victorian property without central heating comprising 2 rooms, kitchen/diner bathroom/WC. The flat has double glazing, but carpets and white goods are the tenants.
4. The previous registered rent was £164.50 per week and was registered on 1 June 2020 and effective from the same date. The rent was the capped rent which was below the s70 rent of £185.00 per week.
5. The landlord objected to the registered rent by letter dated 14 April 2022 and the matter was referred to the tribunal.
6. On 13 May 2022, the tribunal issued Directions for proceeding by written representations.
Evidence
The Landlord’s Case
7. The Landlord submitted evidence of 2 comparables, one in [ADDRESS] and one in [ADDRESS]. Agents particulars were included
[ADDRESS] – a flat of 2 rooms kitchen and bathroom let at £1350 per month.
[ADDRESS] – a flat of 3 room kitchen and bathroom/wc let at £1500 per month.
8. The landlord presented a valuation starting at £1500 per month with deductions of £200 for no carpets curtains and white goods, £100 for no central heating, £100 for an unmodernised kitchen and bathroom and £100 for no furniture to get to a net figure of £1000 per month.
9. The landlord then deducted 10% for scarcity from the headline figure totalling £150 to get to net rent of £850 per month or £190.82 per week
The Tenant’s case
10. No rental evidence was submitted by the Tenant. The reply form stated the landlord rewired and replaced windows in 2011. The tenant redecorated in 2015. A photograph of a crack in an internal partition was submitted. Floors were said to be noisy and there was water damage from a leak in the flat upstairs.
Inspection
11. In accordance with the directions the tribunal did not inspect the property. The tribunal took into account photographs on [ADDRESS] which show limited detail.
The Law
12. When determining a fair rent in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, the tribunal has regard to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) including the age, location and state of repair of the property.
13. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasized that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property.
14. The rent has been previously registered, and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 therefore applies unless there are significant improvements made by the Landlord which increase the rent which would be registered by more than 15%. There are no such improvements in this case
Discussion and Valuation
15. In addition to the evidence provided by the Landlord the tribunal has relied on its knowledge and experience.
16. The tribunal firstly has to consider the rent in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act as a market rent less scarcity. The tribunal has considered the rental evidence and it has also applied its knowledge and experience. The tribunal considers that the rent for the subject property, in this location, and in the condition and with the amenities which the market would expect, would be £1400.00 per month. The tribunal has adjusted for the condition of the property, lack of central heating, lack of white goods and for the repairing terms of the tenancy as compared with a standard assured shorthold tenancy and makes a deduction of 35% for these factors.
17. The Tribunal found that there was substantial scarcity of letting property in the locality of Greater London and using its knowledge and experience made a deduction of 20% from the adjusted market rent. The calculation of the s70 rent is set out below.
s70 rent PCM Market rent 1,400.00 £ less condition & terms 35% 490.00 -£ adjusted rent 910.00 £ less scarcity off adj rent 20% 182.00 -£ Fair rent per month 728.00 £ per week 168.00 £
Capped rent
18. In accordance with the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 the maximum rent is the previous registered rent increased in accordance with the Order which provides for the previous rent to be increased by the percentage increase in the retail prices index plus 5% if the [NAME] is a second or later [NAME] since 1 February 1999.
19. The previous registered rent was £164.50 per week. The retail prices index figure to be used is the figure published in the month before the decision. The decision was made in July, and the latest figure published was 340 and which is the upper figure to be used. The index at the date of the last registration was 292.7. Applying the formula produces a maximum fair rent of £199.50 per week which is above the s70 rent of £168.00 per week.
20. The rent to be registered is the lower of the two figures and is the s70 rent of £168.00 per week.
21. The effective date is the date of the decision which is 20 July 2022.
[NAME] [NAME] - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
• The Tribunal is required to set out rights of appeal against its decisions by virtue of the rule 36 (2)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 and these are set out below.
• If a party wishes to appeal against this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
• The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
• If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
• The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Tenancy Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Central London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenants
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Using Retail Price Index
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined according to the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
- The fair rent takes into account the market rent less scarcity.
- The fair rent is adjusted according to the Retail Price Index and statutory formulas.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The fair rent for a property was set at £168.00 per week.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the market rent and scarcity, adjusting for the condition and terms of the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the adjustment for the condition and terms of the property.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the market rent and scarcity when determining the fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Comparative rental evidence and the condition of the property were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
