First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Purchase Price
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided that the price for purchasing the freehold interest is £16,136. This decision was made following an a person under the Leasehold Reform Act 1993.
⚖️ Legal holding
Qualifying tenants are entitled to purchase the freehold interest under certain conditions.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal determined the price for the purchase of the freehold interest.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the price for the purchase of the freehold interest to be £16,136, following an application under sections 50 and 51 of the Leasehold Reform Housing & Urban Development Act 1993.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : SR/LON/00AY/OCE/2024/0619 Property : 101 & 101A [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicants :
[redacted] : [COUNSEL] LLP Respondent: [redacted] : Not applicable – missing landlord Type of [NAME] : [NAME] under sections 50 and 51 of the Leasehold Reform Housing & Urban Development Act 1993 Tribunal members : Mr [NAME] Valuer Venue : Remote Date of paper determination : 18 March 2025 Corrected March 24 2025 Corrected in accordance with Rule 50 Tribunal Procedure (First Tier Tribunal) ( Property Chamber) Rules (2013)
DECISION
Decisions of the Tribunal (1) The Tribunal determines the price to be paid by the applicants for the purchase of the freehold interest is £16,136. (2) The terms of the draft lease are provided for in paragraph 13 below.
2 The background 1. This is an [NAME] pursuant to a vesting order made by District Judge Bishop at the County Court Croydon on 12 September 2024 under section 26 of the Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (“the 1993 Act”).
2. Section 26(1) of the 1993 Act concerns claims for collective enfranchisement where the relevant landlord cannot be found or fails to engage with the enfranchisement process. It enables the court to make a vesting order in respect of any interests of the landlord which are liable to acquisition.
3. Under section 27 of the 1993 Act, the role of the Tribunal is to determine the appropriate sum to be paid into court in respect of the landlord’s interests.
4. The applicants in this matter are the qualifying tenants of the ground floor flat [ADDRESS], [NAME] and the qualifying tenants of the first and second floor flat [ADDRESS], [NAME] [NAME] and [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]. The two flats together with appurtenant land constitute 101 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (“the Property”).
5. On 31 January 2023, the Claimants applied for a section 13 notice to be registered with the [NAME] in respect of [RESPONDENT] and [NAME] [RESPONDENT]. The Section 13 notice stipulated (a) the rights to be acquired (b) the grounds of the claim and (c) the price of £12,000 to purchase the Freehold Proper.
6. On 2 January 2024, the applicants issued a Part 8 Claim in the County Court at Wandsworth for an order pursuant to section 26(1) of the 1993 Act vesting the freehold interest in the Property in the applicants. The applicants have been unable to ascertain the whereabouts of the respondent freeholders and were, therefore, unable to serve a notice on them pursuant to Section 13 of the 1993 Act.
7. The applicant has provided the tribunal with a valuation report prepared by Mr [NAME] MA MRICS dated 12 December 2024. The valuation date adopted for his report is 31 January 2023.
8. Mr [NAME] is of the view the premium payable for the freehold is £15,136.
9. Comparable sales' transaction evidence is provided in the submitted valuation report to support his opinion of freehold purchase value. The extent and condition of the original demise is also described.
10. The tribunal has relied upon their knowledge and experience of the property market in the locality in [NAME] this determination. They have also had regard for recent and relevant Upper Tribunal decisions. The determination 11. The tribunal accepts the opinions expressed by Mr [NAME] in his valuation report dated 12 December 2024 , save that [NAME] fails to include any sum for the appurtenant property taken by the applicants on enfranchisement.
3 There is a value in this interest to the freeholder which includes pathways and other common areas. The tribunal, in accordance with the 1993 Act provisions applies a value of £1,000 to the compensation payable for enfranchisement. A sum of £750 payable by the qualifying tenants of flat 101 and £250 by the tenants of flat 101a. The assessed value is based upon the previous experience and knowledge of similar appurtenant land transactions at enfranchisement.
12. The collective enfranchisement valuation calculation submitted by [NAME] at page 54 of the bundle (Appendix 5) is accepted save for the additional £1,000 appurtenant property compensation.
Accordingly, the tribunal determines that the premium to be paid in respect of the acquisition of the freehold of the property on statutory terms is £16,136 less any summarily agreed costs.
13. The tribunal also approves the draft TR1 transfer included in the bundle at pp.101 -106 subject to: - the inclusion at section 8 the sum £16,136 less any summarily agreed costs as the sum payable for the freehold ; and - that a new transfer plan is prepared which is drawn to scale and complies in full with the current HMLR plan requirements. The current lease plans do not show clearly the rights of way and garden areas to be allocated to the enfranchised title.
14. This matter should now be returned to the County Court sitting at [ADDRESS] under claim number L00CR013 for the final procedures to take place. Valuer Chairman: [NAME]: 18 March 2025 Corrected 24 March 2024
4
RIGHTS OF APPEAL 1. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28-days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the Decision to the [NAME].
3. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
4. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Secures Rent Repayment Order Against Landlord
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Freehold Purchase Price Set at £70,600 by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Halts Market Rent Determination Until Valid Notice Confirmed
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reviews Pitch Fee Increase Based on CPI
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy: First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Management Company Allowed Urgent Lift Repairs Without Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Price for Freehold Purchase When Landlord Untracea…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Claimant Successfully Obtains Right to Manage Premises
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Works on Residential Estate
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant meets the conditions set by the Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act.
- The landlord cannot be found, allowing the tenant to purchase the freehold interest.
- The tenant is entitled to pay reasonable costs to the landlord under specified legal provisions.
- The tenant is able to challenge the validity of a landlord's notice before a formal determination.
- The leaseholders have been made aware of the application and have not objected to it.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal determined the price for purchasing the freehold interest to be £16,136.
Who was involved?
The case involved qualifying tenants and a missing landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court relied on a valuation report and local property market knowledge to determine the appropriate sum.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 50 and 51 of the Leasehold Reform Housing & Urban Development Act 1993 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The valuation report provided by a registered valuer was crucial in determining the price.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the qualifying tenants.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can apply for the purchase of a freehold interest under the same legislation.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The valuation report and the collective enfranchisement notice were important pieces of evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a party may appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
