First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Transfer Price
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided on the price for transferring the freehold interest of a property in Leeds based on valuation evidence provided by the applicant. The decision was made under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
⚖️ Legal holding
The appropriate sum for the transfer of the freehold interest must be determined by the Tribunal based on valuation evidence.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the price for transferring the freehold interest based on valuation evidence provided.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the purchase price for the freehold interest of a property located in Leeds, based on valuation evidence submitted by the applicant under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : MAN/OODA/OAF/2019/0008
Property : 55 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Applicants : [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : S21(1)(a) and S27(5) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967
Tribunal Members : :
Mr [NAME] Ms. [NAME] of Decision : 17 May 2019
Date of Determination : 24 May 2019
DECISION
ORDER
That the purchase price for the freehold interest of 55 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] be determined at £100.
That the Applicant shall pay the purchase price into Court pursuant to s27(5) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
THE APPLICATION
1. The Applicant issued an application on the 13 March 2019 for an order under s21(1) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (“the Act”) for a determination as to the amount of the appropriate sum to be paid into Court under s27(5) of the Act for transfer of the Freehold of the Property, the Landlord being missing.
2. An order was made by District Judge Goldberg in the County Court at Leeds on the 26 February 2019 that the rights and obligations of the parties be determined as if the claimant had, at the date of the application, duly given notice of her desire to have the freeholder under section 27 of the Act.
3. The Tribunal is therefore asked by the Applicant to determine the single issue of the price payable for the transfer of the freehold interest pursuant to s21 of the Act.
4. Directions were made on 12 April 2019 for the Applicant to provide two copies of any evidence (including valuations, photographs and plans) she wished the Tribunal to consider, along with a draft transfer.
5. The Application was listed to be determined on the papers alone, following an inspection of the Property.
THE PROPERTY
6. The Tribunal carried out an inspection of the Property at 10.00am on 17 May 2019. The Applicant was present and arranged access for the Tribunal.
7. The Property was found to be a semi- detached bungalow built in or around the 1950s satisfying the condition of s2(1) of the Act on a road of similar semi- detached and detached houses.
8. Internally was an entrance hall and stairs, a lounge, dining kitchen, three bedrooms and bathroom with WC. A brick built garage was attached with car port behind. It was on a large plot with gardens to front and rear.
9. The Tribunal subsequently met for deliberations. In accordance with the directions, no hearing was held and the Tribunal considered the application in the light of evidence and submissions filed by the Applicants, the inspection, and its own expert knowledge.
THE LEASE
10. The lease of [ADDRESS] was granted by [NAME] to the Leeds Ex Serviceman’s Housing Association Limited and others (sureties of the Association) on the 5th November 1951. The lease was granted for a period of 999 years from 2nd July 1951 at a ground rent of £6 12s 6d (£6.63) per annum.
THE LAW
s21 Jurisdiction of tribunals.
(1) The following matters shall, in default of agreement, be determined by the appropriate tribunal namely,—
(a) the price payable for a house and premises under section 9 above;
(b) the amount of the rent to be payable (whether originally or on a revision) for a house and premises in accordance with section 15(2);
(ba) the amount of any costs payable under section 9(4) or 14(2);
(c) the amount of any compensation payable to a tenant under section 17 or 18 for the loss of a house and premises.
(cza) the amount of the appropriate sum to be paid into court under section 27(5);
(ca) the amount of any compensation payable under section 27A;
(1A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1B) No application may be made to the appropriate tribunal under subsection
(1) above to determine the price for a house and premises unless either—
(a) the landlord has informed the tenant of the price he is asking; or
(b) two months have elapsed without his doing so since the tenant gave notice of his desire to have the freehold under this Part of this Act.
VALUATION EVIDENCE
11. The Applicants filed valuation evidence prepared by Mr. [NAME] of [NAME], Manchester.
12. Mr [NAME] confirmed he was instructed to value the purchase price of the property as set out in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 as amended by the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993, the Housing Act 1996 and the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
13. His opinion was that the price payable on the basis set out in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 is in the order of £100 (One Hundred Pounds), exclusive of costs. His calculation was set out at Appendix 3 of his report, and was based on a market value of £221,000 of the existing lease with 99% of the freehold, with the freehold value with vacant possession assessed at £223,232.
14. The Ground rent at £6.63 per annum with a [NAME] at 6.5% for the remaining 931.5 years of the term produced a figure of £102 for the landlord’s interest.
DETERMINATION
15. The price payable by the Applicants for the Transfer of the freehold will be £100.
16. The Tribunal considered market information of comparable properties currently on the market and recently sold in the local area. Two similar bungalows on [ADDRESS] £195,000 and £199,950. A three-bedroomed property (on a smaller plot) at [ADDRESS] sold on the 14th February 2019 for £205,000; A three bedroomed semi-detached house [ADDRESS] sold on the 2 November 2018 for £240,000. In those circumstances Mr. [NAME] valuation of the freehold was accepted. There is no marriage value to consider given the length of the reversion being in excess of 80 years.
17. The Tribunal accepted a market yield of 6.5%, for annual rent of £6.63, a Year’s Purchase would be 0.0650 multiplied by the remaining length of the term (931.5 years) provides a figure of £102, and in circumstances the Tribunal would adopt the Applicant’s suggestion of arriving at figure of £100.
18. There is no need to make an order for any costs to be borne by the Applicant, as there has been no Respondent to this application
Judge John Murray
17 May 2019
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Freehold Interest Valuation Under Leasehold Reform Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Freehold Transfer Price Set at £131 - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Freehold Purchase Price Determined Under Leasehold Reform Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Interest Valuation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Freehold Transfer Price Set at £131 by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Transfer Price
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Freehold Transfer Price at £73.50
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Management Fees and Declares Some Service Charges Unpayabl…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Reasonable Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Successfully Acquires Freehold Interest Under Leasehold Reform Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Unreasonable Administration Charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Allowed to Proceed with Urgent Repairs Without Consulting Tenants
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- Tenants are entitled to acquire the freehold interest in their property.
- The appropriate sum for transferring the freehold interest is determined by the Tribunal.
- Tenants can challenge the reasonableness of service charges and management fees.
- Fair valuation of the freehold interest is determined based on the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
- Administration charges are not considered reasonable without clear evidence of lease breaches.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified as leading to a decision against the claimant in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided the price for transferring the freehold interest of a property in Leeds.
Who was involved?
The applicant and the missing landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on valuation evidence provided by the applicant.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Leasehold Reform Act 1967 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The valuation evidence provided by the applicant was crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure they have strong valuation evidence.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The valuation evidence provided by the applicant mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
