First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the market rent for a rented room with an en-suite bathroom. They set the rent at £725 per month, effective from November 24, 2024, after considering the property's condition and similar rental prices in the area.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a market rent that reflects current rental values in the local area.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property under similar conditions.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for a furnished room with an en-suite bathroom in a converted house.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the market rent for a furnished room with an en-suite bathroom in a converted house. The rent was set at £725 per calendar month, effective from November 24, 2024, based on comparable lettings evidence and the property's condition.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/00MR/MNR/2024/0614
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT] I [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] c/o [NAME], 266 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £725.00 Per Calendar Month (To include: all Utilities up to £100 per month, Council Tax and any amounts in paras. 3 and 4)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 24 November 2024
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 24 June 2022
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord, save any Tenant neglect. Section 11, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 applies.
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Landlord. Double bed, wardrobe, chest of drawers, two bedside cabinets, desk, table, three chairs, flat screen television and four window blinds.
8. Description of premises A three storey, late Victorian/early Edwardian terrace town house of traditional brick construction, now divided into seven rooms, each with an en suite shower/WC. At the ground floor rear is a communal kitchen, living room and washing facilities. There is a shared garden with bicycle storage shed. Room 5 is on the first floor (front) with an area of 21.14 square metres (228 square feet).
[NAME] of Decision 17 December 2024
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/00MR/MNR/2024/0614 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] : None Respondent Landlord : Mr [COUNSEL] : [NAME] of Application : Determination of a Market Rent. Sections 13 & 14, Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] of Inspection : None, Determination on Papers Date of Decision : 17 December 2024
DECISION
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024
2
Decision of the Tribunal On 17 December 2024 the Tribunal determined a Market Rent of £725 (Seven Hundred and Twenty-Five Pounds) Per Calendar Month to take effect from 24 November 2024. Background 1. The case concerns the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s Notice of proposed increase of rent payable by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14, Housing Act 1988.
2. On 4 October 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 to propose a new rent of £725 per month in place of the existing rent of £695 per month to take effect from 24 November 2024. The Notice complied with the legal requirements and sought an increase in rent of £30 per month.
3. On 13 October 2024 the Tenant served an Application to refer the Landlord’s Notice under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988 proposing the new rent under the Tenancy to the First-tier Tribunal.
4. The Tribunal issued Directions dated 1 November 2024. The Tribunal does not consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake an inspection nor to hold a Tribunal hearing unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.
5. The Tribunal in its Directions informed the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on the papers (written representations), paragraph 5.
6. Similarly, the parties were informed the Tribunal will not inspect the property but will seek to view it on the internet; and goes on to say if it considers it necessary, it may carry out an external inspection, paragraph 6.
7. The parties were directed to complete and return their completed ‘Rent Appeal Statement’ to form their statement of case, within specific time limits, paragraphs 8 – 12 inclusive. The Rent Appeal Statement includes for provision of photographs to assist the Tribunal to understand the case and to help the party to present the issues.
8. Both parties submitted completed Rent Appeal Statements in accordance with the Directions. The Statements included: a description of the property with both floor plans and photographs to assist, an outline of the property’s features, any improvements, condition and an assessment of the rental value with comparable lettings evidence to support the same. The papers were also copied to the other party.
9. Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 17 December 2024 based on the Rent Appeal Statements (Papers) submitted.
3
The Property 10. From the information provided in the Papers and [ADDRESS], [ADDRESS] is a three-storey, late Victorian/early Edwardian terrace town house of traditional brick construction. It has been divided into seven rooms, each with an en suite shower room/WC. On the ground floor at the rear are communal living-room, kitchen and washing facilities. There is a rear garden shared by the occupants with a bicycle shed.
11. The property is in a residential area close to bus and rail links.
12. Room 5 is on the first floor at the front of the property. The Papers include floor plans of [ADDRESS] and Room 5. In their description of the property, the [NAME] lists the area of the Room (to exclude the en suite shower room/WC) at 18.39 square metres. The en suite shower room/WC is listed with an area of 2.75 square metres. Aggregate area to equal 21.14 square metres (228 square feet). The Tenancy Agreement 13. The tenancy agreement is dated 18 June 2022 (tenant) and 20 June 2022 (landlord) and is for a minimum period of six months from 24 June 2022 at a rent of £650 per month. At the expiration of the minimum period the tenancy continues ‘thereafter as a contractual periodic tenancy on a rolling monthly basis.’ Whereas there is provision for the rent to be reviewed, there is no review mechanism.
14. The tenant covenants, inter alia, to keep the premises in good tenantable repair. Utility bills up to £100 per tenant per month are included in the rent. In addition, the landlord ‘…agrees to pay the Council Tax whilst the property is classed as one sole property.’ 15. Similarly, the landlord covenants, inter alia, to provide for quiet enjoyment and ‘…To keep in repair and proper working order all mechanical and electrical items including all washing machines, dishwashers, and other similar mechanical or electrical appliances belonging to the landlord…’. The agreement is subject to section 11, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
16. Furniture is provided under the tenancy, as follows: one double bed, wardrobe, chest of drawers, two bedside cabinets, one desk, one table and three chairs. Submissions – Rent Appeal Statements 17. The [NAME], Ms [COUNSEL] of [NAME], submitted a Rent Appeal Statement in accordance with the Directions, having sent a copy to the tenant on 13 November 2024. An increase from the current rent payable of £695 per calendar month to £725 per calendar month from 24 November 2024 is reaffirmed.
18. Floor plans of the property and the Room are provided. Areas of the Room and a selection of photographs are included to assist also.
19. Improvements: it is stated ‘…The property underwent a complete and full renovation/refurbishment which completed towards the end of 2019…The tenant moved into the property in June 2022 when the fixtures and
4
installations were only 2.5 years old and still in very good condition as per the inventory…’ It goes on to say ‘…Currently, there are no ongoing disrepairs/defects that we have been made aware of.’ 20. The [NAME] sets out comparable lettings evidence to support the proposed new rent of £725 per calendar month. It is not the Tribunal’s intention to give an analysis of all the evidence listed, but to outline the overall valuation approach to show that all aspects have been considered.
21. The valuation approach is in three parts: (1) rooms with en suite bathrooms let by [NAME] within the last two months; (2) listings of rooms in HMO properties available to let, downloaded from [NAME], dated 11 November 2024; and (3) a similar listing of rooms available to let in a house share, downloaded from [NAME], dated 12 November 2024. We comment on each part briefly as follows. 22. (1) Rooms let out by [NAME]: outline details of five lettings are set out in a schedule in tabular form. One of those listed is Room 2 in the subject property. From the floor plans provided, Room 2 is on the ground floor, towards the centre of the property and adjacent to the communal areas. The area (‘Size in sqm’) is 10.09 square metres. The ‘Cost per sqm in £’ for Room 2 is £69.38 per calendar month, per square metre. The average of the five lettings in the schedule is £66.27 per calendar month, per square metre. The corresponding rate for Room 5 for the proposed new rent of £725 per calendar month is £39.42 per calendar month, per square metre. 23. (2) [NAME]: the download is of 53 listings on 11 November 2024. Following (1) above, a schedule in tabular form puts the properties into baskets having applied six filters under ‘Room Type’, one of which is ‘Double with Ensuite, All Bills included.’ ‘The Average Rent’ for 33 of the 53 properties listed is £743.91 per calendar month, per square metre, which Ms [NAME] points out is ‘(higher than the rent increase proposed).’ 24. (3) [NAME]: the download is of 33 listings on 12 November 2024. Again following (1) and (2) outlined above, a schedule in tabular form puts the properties into baskets having applied six filters under Room Type, one of which is ‘Double with Ensuite, All Bills included.’ The Average Rent for 15 of the 33 properties listed is £738.33 per calendar month, per square metre, which Ms [NAME] states is ‘more than the proposed increase.’ 25. In conclusion Ms [NAME] goes on to say currently she would recommend the property be marketed to let at £775 to £785 per month.
26. The tenant, Mr [APPELLANT], submitted a Rent Appeal Statement in accordance with the Directions too, with copy sent to the [NAME] on 22 November 2024.
27. A selection of photographs is included to assist which in turn reflect Mr [NAME] occupancy. The outline details under ‘Description’ confirm Ms [NAME] corresponding description in her statement.
5
28. Improvements: Mr [NAME] says ‘There have been no large improvements to the property since I initially moved in.’ 29. Condition of the property: a) Disrepairs/Defects – there is reference to ongoing issues with the boiler, leading to a lack of running hot water and heating at times; b) Age and Condition of Bathroom and Kitchen fittings - save the boiler issues, ‘everything is in working order.’ 30. Mr [NAME] does not give his assessment of the rental value of the property; however, he confirms: all bills are included in the rent; a fortnightly cleaning service is included too; and the garden is maintained by members of the house. On the latter point, at clause 5.13.1 of the tenancy agreement, Gardens and Driveways, …’the Tenant agrees to keep them clean and tidy, properly cultivated etc.’ 31. Mr [NAME] provides outline letting particulars of three properties downloaded from [NAME], briefly as follows: (1) [ADDRESS], Portsmouth – HMO, one bedroom, furnished, at an asking rent of £675 per calendar month, an equivalent £51.92 per calendar month, per square metre; (2) [ADDRESS], Southsea – en suite rooms available to let in this seven bedroom terrace house at £675 per calendar month; and (3) [ADDRESS], Portsmouth – HMO, one bedroom, furnished, soon to be on the market at an asking rent of £695 per calendar month.
32. Mr [NAME] concludes ‘Other more expensive rooms over £700 are all being marketed as ‘Luxury’, and I believe should not be considered.’
The Law Section 14, Housing Act 1988 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal (1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy-
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a [NAME];
6
(b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-
(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit. (4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1)(a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements.
Considerations and Valuation 33. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to decide this case reasonably and fairly based on the papers submitted only, with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers the Tribunal decided it could do so.
34. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant are not relevant to this issue.
35. The property is a good conversion with good quality fixtures, fittings and white goods. The market rent to be determined is of a first-floor room, furnished, with ensuite shower room/WC. Where the tenant has use of communal facilities, a shared garden and a bicycle store.
7
36. In its assessment of Ms [NAME] evidence, the Tribunal attributed most weight to the rooms with en suite bathrooms that [NAME] has let out in the preceding two months (sub paragraph 1) of her valuation approach). In particular, the letting of Room 2, in the subject building, in July 2024 at £700 per calendar month. In the Tribunal’s view, Room 2 is an inferior room to Room 5, being on the ground floor, adjacent to the communal areas, lesser internal area, awkward in shape and without a desk.
37. Turning to sub paragraphs 2) and 3), of Ms [NAME] valuation approach, the filter exercises of the listings downloaded from [NAME] and [NAME] and their analysis go to support the corresponding analyses of recent comparable lettings.
38. Mr [NAME] does not give his assessment of the rental value of Room 5. He has provided outline marketing details of three properties downloaded from [NAME]. All are listed as one bedroom with en suite bathroom and furnished. [ADDRESS] is listed on the market to let at an asking rent of £675 per calendar month. The ‘size’ is given at 13 square metres. This is appreciably less than Room 5, which has an area, to include the en suite shower room/WC, of 21.14 square metres.
39. For the properties in [ADDRESS] and [ADDRESS], there is insufficient detail given to draw any reasonable valuation conclusion to attribute weight, beyond that both and [ADDRESS] would sit in the baskets of properties available to let that Ms [NAME] has downloaded at her sub paragraphs 2) and 3).
40. The Tribunal having considered all the above, the parties’ Rent Appeal Statements with associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in the Portsmouth area, has decided that the market rent for Room 5 in accordance with the legislation is £725 per calendar month.
41. The tenant made no representations that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause undue hardship. Determination 42. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which Room 5 might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy was £725 (Seven Hundred and Twenty-Five Pounds) Per Calendar Month.
43. The Tribunal directs that the new rent of £725 per calendar month should take effect from the 24 November 2024, this being the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice.
8
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 days’ time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 days’ time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Set at £900 pcm by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets new rent for assured periodic tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £490 per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy Dispute
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Set at £1,450 for Cambridge Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Listed Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,000 per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Tenancy Based on Written Submissions
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a market rent reflecting current rental values in the local area.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent assessment based on the condition and location of the property.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable properties in the area.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.
- The tenant is entitled to have their rent set at a fair market rate by the First-tier Tribunal if they dispute a landlord's proposed increase.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided the market rent for a rented room with an en-suite bathroom should be £725 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and landlord were involved in a rent review process.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on comparable rental prices and the property's condition.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The comparable rental prices and the property's condition were the most important arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should expect their rent to be set based on current market conditions.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and floor plans of the property were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, the decision can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
