VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a new monthly rent of £1,200 for an assured periodic tenancy. They considered the condition of the property and similar rents in the area to reach this decision.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.

Topics

tenancymarket rentassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under an assured tenancy. The tribunal will then decide a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market. The decision takes into account the condition of the property and comparable rents in the area.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a market rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,200 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the condition of the property and comparable rents in the area.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00LC/MNR/2023/0267

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 73 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [RESPONDENT] [NAME] [RESPONDENT] [NAME]

Landlord Miss [RESPONDENT] [NAME] 6, [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT] & Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1200.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 11 November 2023

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 11 October 2011

5. Length of the term or rental period 12 Months

6. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises A 1960’s built mid terrace house located in an established estate. Accommodation comprises three bedrooms, living room, cloakroom, kitchen, bathroom/wc, integral garage and garden.

[NAME] [NAME] of Decision 22 February 2024

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/00LC/MNR/2023/0267 Property : 73 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : [NAME] : None Respondent Landlord : [COUNSEL] : [COMPANY] of Application :

Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision :

22nd February 2024

DECISION

2

Summary of Decision 1. On the 22nd February 2024 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,200 per month to take effect from the 11th November 2023.

Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.

3. On the 12th September 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,200 per month in place of the existing rent of £875per month to take effect from 11th November 2023. The notice complied with the legal requirements and constitutes an increase of £325 per month.

4. On the 9th November 2023 the Tenant appealed to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988. The application was dated 11th September 2023 but the covering email confirms the date as 9th November 2023.

5. The Tribunal does not consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.

6. The Tribunal issued Directions on the 9th January 2024 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.

7. Both parties submitted completed Rent Appeal Statements setting out their respective cases which included comparable evidence from the landlord’s agent ranging from a two bedroom house to a one bedroom flat. Floor. The papers were also copied to the other party.

8. Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on the 22nd February 2024 based on the written representations received. The Property 9. From the information given in the papers and available on Rightmove and Google Maps, the property comprises a two storey mid terrace house built around the 1960’s The property is in a residential area close to local amenities.

10. The accommodation comprises: living room/dining room, cloakroom, kitchen, three bedrooms, bathroom/WC. There is gas central heating system and double- glazed windows. The landlord provided carpets and curtains. There were no white goods at the commencement of the tenancy.

3 Submissions 11. The assured tenancy began on the 11th October 2011 for a term of 12 months at a rent of £700 per month.

12. As previously mentioned, the tenant completed the Rent Appeal Statement. It is stated the kitchen and bathroom fittings are dated. The tenant also takes issue with the landlord’s statement confirming there are no carpets and curtains.

13. The landlord also submitted a Rent Appeal Statement.

14. The Energy Performance Rating for the property has an energy rating of 64D. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal

(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy-

(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.

(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-

(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.

4 (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-

(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.

(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.

Consideration and Valuation 15. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.

16. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant are not relevant to this issue.

17. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in the Chatham area, the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £1,350 per month.

18. However, the property is not let in such a condition as would command this full rent and the Tribunal needs to make some adjustment to this full rent to allow for the lack of white goods and dated kitchen and bathroom fittings.

19. The Tribunal has considered very carefully each parties submissions and using its own expertise, considers that a deduction of £150 should be applied. This reduces the rental figure to £1,200 per month. It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based upon capital costs but is the Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant. The Tribunal have disregarded any improvements undertaken by the tenant including replacement flooring.

5 20. The Tenant made no representations that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. Determination 21. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy was £1,200 per month.

22. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £1,200 per month should take effect from the 11th November 2023, this being the date specified in the Notice.

[NAME] [NAME] 22nd February 2024

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent is assessed at a fair market rate by the Tribunal.
  • The condition and amenities provided by the landlord are considered in the rent assessment.
  • The proposed rent increase is compared to the open market value.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The rent increase does not reflect a fair market value adjusted for property condition and amenities.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new monthly rent of £1,200 for the assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant appealed the landlord's proposed rent increase to the Tribunal.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal reviewed the written representations and determined the rent based on the property's condition and comparable rents.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and the comparable rents in the area were crucial to the decision.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may be able to challenge a proposed rent increase through the First-tier Tribunal.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The Rent Appeal Statements from both the tenant and landlord were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.