VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the market rent for a tenant's property under an assured tenancy. The tenant argued that the landlord's proposed rent increase was excessive, and the Tribunal agreed, setting the rent at £1,000 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have the market rent for their property determined by the Tribunal under the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

market rent determinationassured tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent, considering factors such as the type of tenancy, the start date of the new tenancy, and the terms of the existing tenancy. Additionally, certain factors like improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance are disregarded when determining the rent.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the market rent for a property under an assured tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a property under an assured tenancy to be £1,000 per month, effective from 25 November 2023, based on the Housing Act 1. The tenant contested the landlord's proposed rent increase of £1,100 per month.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

1

Case Reference : CAM/00KF/MNR/2023/0127 P:PAPERREMOTE

Property : [ADDRESS] Southend on Sea [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted]

: [RESPONDENT] of Application : 14 September 2023

Type of Application : Determination of the market rent under Section 14 Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mrs [NAME] and venue of : 5 December 2023 Determination remote on the papers

_______________________________________________

DECISION ____________________________________

The market rent as at 25 November 2023 is £1,000 per month.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Background

1. On 14 September 2023, the tenant referred to the Tribunal a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.

2. The landlord's notice, which was dated 12 September 2023, proposed a rent of £1,100 per month with effect from 25 November 2023 in place of the existing rent of £1,000 per month.

3. The tenant occupies under a periodic tenancy which commenced on the expiry of a tenancy for six months from 25 March 2019.

4. Directions were issued by the tribunal on 9 October 2023.

5. Prior to the hearing the tenant sent their submissions to the tribunal and copied them to the landlord, no representations were made by or on behalf of the landlord. The Evidence 6. In written submissions the tenant stated that the accommodation was on the first floor of a two storey house. The accommodation comprised three rooms, kitchen and bathroom/wc. The flat was centrally heated, the windows single glazed and he had supplied the carpets and curtains and electric cooker, the other white goods were provided by the landlord. The windows were ill fitting and draughty.

7. He had looked for alternative accommodation but his income was not sufficient to rent a house at [ADDRESS], a house with three bedrooms and two bathrooms, had a garden and was marketed at £1,000 per month. The house provided better accommodation than his flat.

8. The rent at the beginning of the tenancy was £700 per month. The landlord had increased the rent regularly. The current proposal was excessive. The property 9. The flat is situated close to local shops, approximately 0.2 miles from the nearest bus stop and a mile from Shoeburyness railway station. On street parking is available in the road although there are double yellow lines outside the subject property.

10. The flat does not have the benefit of any private outside space or parking facilities.

3

The law

11. In accordance with the terms of section 14 Housing Act 1988 I proceeded to determine the rent at which I considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.

12. In so doing I, as required by section 14(1), ignored the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act and also any items of disrepair which either the tenant had not reported to the landlord or had not allowed access for the landlord to carry out the necessary repairs.

Valuation

13. In coming to my decision, as the landlord did not provide any rental evidence the I relied on the rental comparables provided by the tenant together with my own general knowledge of rents in Shoeburyness. 14. I determine that the open market rent of the property as at 25 November 2023 is £1,000 per month, which is the effective date in the landlord’s notice.

The decision 15. The open market rental value of the premises is £1,000 per month effective from 25 November 2023, being the effective date in the landlord’s notice.

Chairman: [NAME]: 5 December 2023

ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

I. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 d If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The application should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp-pta- application-for-permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper- tribunal-lands-chamber II. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.

III. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the

4 reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.

IV. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law.

Appendix Housing Act 1988

14 Determination of rent by rent assessment committee. (1)Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but

5 arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit. (4)In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements…. (7)Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal … shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the appropriate tribunal may direct.

6

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 10 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a market rent determined by the Tribunal under the Housing Act 1988.
  • The market rent is based on comparable properties in the area.
  • A reduced rent may be granted due to disrepair and inadequate heating systems.
  • The rent determination excludes improvements made by the tenant.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The market rent determination was dismissed when the conditions for adjustment were not met.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the market rent for the tenant's property at £1,000 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent increase.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, considering the tenant's arguments and the lack of evidence from the landlord.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied to determine the market rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The tenant's argument that the proposed rent increase was excessive and unreasonable was the most significant.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can contest an unreasonable rent increase through the First-tier Tribunal.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The tenant's submission regarding the property's condition and comparable rental prices were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.