VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Tenant

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new market rent for a tenant's property. The rent was set at £750.00 per month after considering factors like the property's condition and location. This decision was made according to the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have a market rent determined by the Tribunal based on the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancy disputesmarket rent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. It allows landlords to serve a notice proposing a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy, provided the notice is served in the prescribed form and meets certain timing requirements.

Housing Act 1988 s.14

A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy, provided the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and more than six months have not elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new market rent for a tenant's property.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a new market rent of £750.00 per month for a tenant's property, taking into account various factors including the property's condition and location. The decision was based on the Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference HAV/45UC/MNR/2025/0845

[ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

Tenant’s Representative Ms [COUNSEL]

Landlord J49 Limited

Landlord’s [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Landlord’s Representative

Date of Application 18 December 2025

Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members [NAME] – [NAME] Member

Date of Decision 5 March 2026

Rent Determined £750.00 per month (£173.08 per week)

Date the new rent takes effect 6 January 2026

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

REASONS FOR THE DECISION

Background

1. On 2 December 2025, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £551.82 per week in place of the existing rent of £145.06 per week, to take effect from 6 January 2026.

2. On 18 December 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

3. The assured tenancy commenced on 16 January 2024 for a term of 6 months. The rental period is monthly.

Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.

4. As per the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtain and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.

5. No fixed service charge is included in the rent.

6. No furniture is provided by the Landlord.

Liability for Council Tax

7. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax.

Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.

8. None

Inspection/Hearing

9. The Tribunal carried out an inspection of the Property on 19 February 2026 in the presence of the Tenant and his representative, Ms [COUNSEL]. The Landlord was notified of the inspection but did not attend.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

10. Neither party requested an oral hearing and nor did the Tribunal consider a hearing necessary. Accordingly, the Tribunal has considered the application on the basis of an inspection, the papers provided by the parties, and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.

The Property

11. The Property was found to be a second floor flat forming part of a three-storey building, accessed via a second, narrow, flight of stairs. The Property offers the following accommodation:

Hall, lounge, kitchen, one bedroom with ensuite shower, and separate bathroom with full suite. The bathroom has a poor layout, with access to the bath severely restricted.

Outside: No parking. No garden.

12. The Property benefits from gas fired central heating to radiators and double glazing.

13. The Property is situated in a mixed residential and commercial area, within close proximity of local amenities, shopping facilities and the seafront. The Property fronts a busy road and is close to a junction, creating some noise disturbance. Local public transport links, including a railway and bus station are within walking distance.

Evidence

14. The Landlord returned the Tribunal’s Reply form duly completed.

15. On 9 January 2026, the Tenant’s representative emailed the Tribunal, copying the Landlord, stating “Please find attached the completed Rent Appeal Statement.” No Statement was attached. On 14 January 2026, the Tribunal Case Officer informed the tenant’s representative that the attachment had not been received. No reply followed. The Tribunal therefore has no Rent Appeal Statement from the Tenant and relies instead on the Tenant’s Rent 1 application form, the Landlord’s Rent Appeal Statement, and the Tribunal’s inspection of the Property.

The Tenant

16. The Tenant made the following comments in the Rent 1 form:

a) The accommodation is as stated at paragraph 11 above.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

b) No furniture or services are provided under the tenancy.

c) The Tenant has not carried out any improvements to the Property.

d) No comparable rental evidence was submitted.

The Landlord

17. The Landlord made the following comments:

a) J49 became the landlord of the Property with effect from 1 December 2025. They are not aware of any material improvements to the Property since such date.

b) The accommodation is as stated at paragraph 11 above.

c) The Landlord states that “Stock condition survey programme has been procured and contractor mobilisation is underway.”

d) With the exception of the cooker, the Tenant provided all white goods, carpets and curtains.

e) The property has no double glazing.

f) No comparable rental evidence was submitted.

Determination and Valuation

18. Neither party submitted any comparable rental evidence.

19. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property modernised and in good order, and reflecting the narrow stair access to the second floor, would be in the order of £780.00 pcm. This is the rent we would expect the property to let for in the open market if it was in the same general condition as comparable properties including having white goods, and curtains provided by the landlord.

20. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made an adjustment in relation to the following:

a) Tenant’s provision of white goods. b) Tenant’s provision of curtains.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

The full valuation is shown below:

Starting Rent

£780.00 pcm Less a) Items given under a) above

£20.00 b) Items given under b) above

£10.00

£30.00

Market rent

£750.00 pcm

Undue hardship

21. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. In cases of undue hardship, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to the date a Tribunal makes its determination.

22. The Tenant has not made any submissions concerning hardship.

23. The new rent will take effect from the date proposed by the Landlord in the Section 13 Notice, such being 6 January 2026.

Decision

24. The Tribunal determines the market rent at £750.00 per calendar month, equating to £173.08 per week, with effect from 6 January 2026.

APPEAL PROVISIONS If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal used its own expert knowledge of local rental values to determine the market rent.
  • The Tribunal adjusted the starting rent downwards because the tenant provided white goods.
  • The Tribunal adjusted the starting rent downwards because the tenant provided curtains.
  • The new rent took effect from the date proposed by the landlord because the tenant did not claim undue hardship.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord's proposed new rent of £551.82 per week was not accepted as the market rent.
  • The landlord's claim that the property had no double glazing was not accepted by the Tribunal.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new market rent of £750.00 per month for the tenant's property.

Who was involved?

The tenant, the landlord, and the First-tier Tribunal were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, considering factors like the property's condition and location.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the need to determine a fair market rent based on the property's condition and location.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should refer their case to the Tribunal for a fair market rent determination.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence included the property's condition, location, and comparable rental evidence.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on any point of law arising from this decision.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.