Tribunal Sets Market Rent After Tenant Improvements
📌 In brief
A First-tier Tribunal set a new market rent for an assured tenancy after considering improvements made by the tenant and a person being unfurnished.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord's proposed rent increase must reflect comparable properties' rents while considering any tenant-improved features and unfurnished status.
📖 What the law says
This section of the Housing Act 1988 applies to certain types of assured tenancies, allowing landlords to serve notices proposing increases in rent. The notice must specify a new rent amount and the start date for the increase, which must be at least two months after the notice is served. There are additional conditions regarding when further increases can be proposed.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy in Bury, adjusting for tenant improvements and lack of furnishings.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy at £366.77 per fortnight, adjusting from the landlord's proposed £381.23 due to tenant-improved features and lack of furnishings.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference
MAN/00BM/MNR/2026/0048
[ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Tenant’s Representative
N/A
[NAME] [APPELLANT]
Landlord’s Address
Suite 7.1, 8 Exchange Quay, Salford, [POSTCODE]
Landlord’s Representative
N/A
Date of Application
22 January 2026
Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members Judge S. [NAME] of Decision
16 April 2026
Rent Determined
£366.77 per fortnight
Date the new rent takes effect
7 March 2026
2
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Background
1. On 8 January 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £381.23 per fortnight in place of the existing rent of £346.77 per fortnight to take effect from 7 March 2026.
2. On 22 January 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
3. The assured tenancy commenced on 1 November 2014 for a term of 6 months. It is now a periodic tenancy. The rental period is fortnightly.
Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.
4. As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtain and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.
5. There are no service charges payable under the tenancy.
6. [NAME] is let unfurnished and does not include carpets, curtains or white goods.
Liability for Council Tax
7. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of [NAME]. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax.
Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.
8. The Tribunal did not consider that any other terms of the tenancy were required to be taken into consideration in determining the rent.
Inspection/Hearing
3
9. Neither party requested an oral hearing. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of an inspection, the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.
[NAME]
10. The Tribunal carried out an inspection of [NAME] on 16 April 2026 in the presence of the Tenant and a representative of the Landlord, Ms [COUNSEL].
11. [NAME] is a two-storey semi-detached house situated on a corner plot built in the c.1930s, with gardens to the front, side and rear. The roof is double pitched with hip and is slate covered. The external walls are of cavity brickwork. Windows are uPVC double glazed. The accommodation comprises:
Ground Floor: Hall, living room, kitchen and understairs store.
First Floor: 3 bedrooms (2 x double and 1 x boxroom), bathroom/w.c.
There is gas-fired central heating.
Evidence
12. Both the Tenant and the Landlord returned the Tribunal’s Reply forms.
The Tenant
13. The Tenant made the following comments:
a) The Tenant has lived at [NAME] for 24 years (having had a joint tenancy, prior to the current one). During his time at [NAME], the Tenant has made significant alterations to [NAME] including, but not limited to: • insulating the wall cavities and loft space, • fitting a new kitchen, • replastering most of [NAME], • replacing rotten front and back doors with composite doors • landscaping and paved outdoor area with other associated landscaping works, • installing a gravel driveway • erecting fencing • installing French doors and fitted wardrobes to the master bedroom.
4
b) Prior to his carrying out the above works, [NAME] was in severe disrepair.
c) [NAME] should be considered as a 2-bedroom house as the third “box” room is so small it cannot function as a bedroom. The tenant currently uses this as an office/study room.
14. In terms of rental evidence, the Tenant refers to there being council properties on the estate with rental prices for a 3-bedroom property being £455 per calendar month (£210 per fortnight).
The Landlord
15. The Landlord made the following comments:
a) A single bed can fit within the small bedroom.
b) Its proposed rent is based upon a Savills red book valuation report dated 31 December 2025 across its portfolio.
c) It has obtained a valuation report from Savills, dated 12 March 2026, in respect of [NAME] which valued [NAME] as at the date of the report at £850 per calendar month (£392.31 per fortnight).
d) It has carried out significant investment at [NAME] totalling £21,960.34 (excluding preliminary works and VAT) and which includes: • Gas safety inspection, • asbestos survey, • masonry repairs, • structural survey, • roofing works.
16. Numerous comparables were provided by the Landlord; both in a schedule and within the report from Savills. The Savills report identified 3-bedroomed properties within the locality of [NAME], and which had not been refurbished. The agreed rents for these properties ranged from £868 - £880 pcm. It also identified refurbished 3-bedroomed properties which had achieved rents of between £1,105.00 and £1,275 pcm, as well as second hand evidence of other 3-bedroomed properties with achieved rents of £1,000-£1,385 pcm.
Determination and Valuation
5
17. The Tribunal considers the comparables provided by the Landlord are relevant to this matter and notes the difference in valuation between the rents for those properties that have been refurbished and those that have not.
18. The Tenant’s references to the rent being paid for Council properties cannot be taken into consideration as these are not open market rents,
19. The Tribunal makes no adjustment for the investment the Landlord has made in respect of [NAME]. Most of the items contained in the schedule are items of repair for which the Landlord is responsible pursuant to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
20. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, and the comparables provided by the Landlord, the Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property modernised and in good order would be in the order of £1,150 per calendar month (£530.77 per fortnight).
21. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made adjustments in relation to the following:
a) furnishings, including white goods, carpets and curtains not being included b) improvements and fittings provided by the Tenant as set out in paragraph 13 above.
The full valuation is shown below:
Starting Rent
£530.77 per fortnight
Less a) Items given under a) above £54.00 b) Items given under b) above £110.00
£164.00
Market rent
£366.77 per fortnight
12. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. In cases of undue hardship, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to the date a Tribunal makes its determination.
13. The Tenant has not asked the Tribunal to fix a later starting date in this case.
6
Decision
14. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £366.77 per fortnight with effect from 7 March 2026.
APPEAL PROVISIONS
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rental Rate for Bury Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent Due to Property Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for HMO Room: £600 PCM
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent at £1,250 per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Semi-Detached House
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for HMO Room
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts HMO Room Rent Due to Poor Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Manchester Property: Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,100 PCM
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The proposed rent increase reflects comparable properties' rents.
- The rent increase is adjusted for tenant-improved features.
- The rent increase considers the property's unfurnished status.
- The proposed rent increase is supported by evidence of comparable rental values.
- The rent increase takes into account the condition of the property.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal determined the market rent at £366.77 per fortnight.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over rent determination.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on comparable property rents and adjustments for tenant improvements and lack of furnishings.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Housing Act 1988 s.13 and Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.11 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The tenant's improvements to the property and its unfurnished status influenced the decision.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
It was partially in favour of the tenant, as it adjusted the rent downward from the landlord's proposal.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider comparable rents and any improvements they've made to their property.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of tenant improvements, valuation reports, and comparables from the landlord were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party can appeal on a point of law within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
