VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

In this case, the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a new market rent for an assured tenancy after considering various factors including comparable rents in the area and specific conditions of the rented property. The final rent was set at £445.00 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent adjusted based on comparable properties and specific conditions of a person in question.

Topics

tenancyrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section of the Housing Act 1988 applies to certain types of assured tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. It allows landlords to serve a notice proposing an increase in rent, which must take effect at least two months after the notice is served. The notice can also specify longer periods for rent increases, depending on the type of tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy, adjusting for furnishings and ventilation issues.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for an assured tenancy, adjusting from £475.00 to £445.00 per month based on comparable properties and specific property conditions such as lack of furnishings and ventilation issues.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference

MAN/00BL/MNR/2025/0970

[ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

Mr [COUNSEL]

N/A

Landlord

Mr [COUNSEL] and Mrs [COUNSEL]. [RESPONDENT]

Landlord’s Address

C/O [RESPONDENT], 651 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Landlord’s [RESPONDENT] of Application

25 September 2025

Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members Judge S. [NAME] of Decision

16 April 2026

Rent Determined

£445.00 per calendar month

Date the new rent takes effect

27 October 2025

2

REASONS FOR THE DECISION

Background

1. On 18 September 2025, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £475.00 per calendar month (pcm) in place of the existing rent of £425.00 pcm to take effect from 27 October 2025.

2. On 25 September 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

3. The assured tenancy commenced on 27 October 2015 for a term of 6 months and is now a periodic tenancy. The rental period is monthly.

Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.

4. As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtain and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.

5. There are no service charges payable under the tenancy.

6. [NAME] is let unfurnished and does not include white goods, curtains or carpet to the bedroom.

Liability for Council Tax

7. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of [NAME]. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax.

Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.

8. The Tribunal did not consider that any other terms of the tenancy were required to be taken into consideration in determining the rent.

3

Inspection/Hearing

9. Neither party requested an oral hearing. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of an inspection, the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.

[NAME]

10. The Tribunal carried out an inspection of [NAME] on 16 April 2026 in the presence of the Tenant. The Landlord was notified of the inspection but did not attend.

11. [NAME] is a ground floor flat in a two-storey semi-detached former house built around 1910 and which has since been converted into five flats. There are gardens to the front and rear and there are two communal car spaces to the rear with access from [ADDRESS]. The roof is double pitched with a slate covering and the walls are of cavity brick. Windows are uPVC double glazed. There is a communal gas-fired central heating system, but the Tenant has no control over this. The accommodation comprises:

Living room with small kitchen off, bedroom and shower-room.

No damp was visible in the bedroom at the time of the Tribunal’s inspection but there was some evidence of black mould in the shower-room.

Evidence

12. Both the Tenant and the Landlord returned the Tribunal’s Reply forms.

The Tenant.

13. The Tenant made the following comments:

a) The Tenant complains of persistent damp in the bedroom which he has had to treat, at his own expense, with damp-proof paint. He also complains of black mould being present and having to be cleaned off regularly.

b) The Tenant feels that it is unreasonable for the rent to be increased whilst the persistent damp remains unresolved and considers that the rent should remain at its current level.

14. The Tenant has not provided any evidence in respect of comparable rents in the area.

4

The Landlord

15. The following comparables were provided by the Landlord (all of which are understood to be one-bedroomed flats:

a) [ADDRESS] (flat immediately above [NAME]). The rent for this property was recently increased to £475.00 pcm following service of a s.13 notice.

b) Two other flats at [ADDRESS] have also had their rent increased by virtue of the service of a s.13 notice to £500.00 pcm on 26 March 2025 and 19 June 2025, although the Landlord acknowledges that these flats are ‘slightly larger’.

c) [ADDRESS] was let on 12 August 2025 at a rent of £595.00 pcm. A copy of the Assured Shorthold Tenancy agreement was provided by the Landlord.

d) [ADDRESS]. The rent for this property was increased to £500.00 pcm on 25 January 2025 following service of a s.13 notice.

Determination and Valuation

16. The Tribunal considers that only the [ADDRESS] comparable provided by the Landlord is relevant to this matter, although the Tribunal is unaware of the size and condition of the flat. The other comparables have had their rent increased by way of a s.13 notice and so are not open market rents.

17. Relying on its own expert and general knowledge of rental values in the area, and the comparable provided by the Landlord, the Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property modernised and in good order would be in the order of £500.00pcm.

18. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made adjustments in relation to the following:

a) Furnishings provided by the Tenant including white goods, curtains and carpet to the bedroom. b) No mechanical ventilation to the shower-room.

The full valuation is shown below:

5

Starting Rent

£500.00 pcm

Less a) Items given under a) above

£50.00 b) Items given under b) above

£5.00

£55.00

Market rent

£445.00 pcm

Undue hardship

12. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. In cases of undue hardship, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to the date a Tribunal makes its determination.

13. The Tenant has not made any submissions that the increase in rent would cause undue hardship to him and, therefore, there is no need for the Tribunal to consider this further.

Decision

14. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £455.00 per calendar month with effect from 27 October 2025.

APPEAL PROVISIONS

If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent should be adjusted based on the condition of the property.
  • Rent adjustments must consider local comparables.
  • Ongoing issues affecting the property's use should influence rent adjustments.
  • Contributions made by the tenant to maintain the property should be reflected in the rent.
  • Environmental factors affecting the property's value should be taken into account.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The rent was not set at a fair market value despite relevant comparables and expert knowledge.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal determined a new market rent for an assured tenancy, adjusting from £475.00 to £445.00 per month.

Who was involved?

A tenant and their landlord were involved in the dispute over rent determination.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal considered comparable rents and specific property conditions such as lack of furnishings and ventilation issues to determine a fair market rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 & 14 were applied in determining the new rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The Tribunal focused on comparable rents and specific property conditions to adjust the proposed rent from £475.00 to £445.00 per month.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was partially in favour of the tenant, as the rent was adjusted downward from what was initially proposed by the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing a rent increase can challenge it based on comparable rents and specific property conditions that affect value.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of comparable rents and inspection reports were crucial in determining the new market rent.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party may apply for permission to appeal on points of law arising from the decision.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.