VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set the market rent for a tenant's assured tenancy at £675 per month. The decision was made after considering evidence about the property’s condition and comparing similar rental prices in the area.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at the market rate as determined by a First-tier Tribunal based on Housing Act 1988 sections 13 & 14.

Topics

tenancy disputesmarket rent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing an increase in rent. The notice must specify a new period for the tenancy starting at least two months after the notice is served. Additionally, if the rent has been previously increased, the next increase can only occur after a specific period, which varies depending on the type of tenancy.

Housing Act 1988 s.14

A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy, provided that the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and more than six months have not elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent at which the dwelling house might reasonably be expected to be let by a willing landlord.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy in Liverpool, considering comparative evidence and local knowledge.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy in Liverpool, setting it at £675 pcm based on comparative evidence and local knowledge of market rates.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2026

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference

MAN/00BY/MNR/2025/1068 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

[NAME]

Tenant’s Representative

N/A

Landlord

[NAME] [COUNSEL] Landlord’s Address

c/o [NAME], [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Landlord’s Representative

N/A

Date of Application

14 December 2025

Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members Judge Watkin Valuer Member – [NAME] of Decision

17 Apri 2026

Rent Determined

£675 per calendar month

Date the new rent takes effect

17 January 2026

2

REASONS FOR THE DECISION

Background

1. On 24 November 2025, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £750 per calendar month (pcm) in place of the existing rent of £675 pcm to take effect from 17 January 2026.

2. On 14 December 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

3. The assured tenancy commenced on 17 March 2023. The rental period is monthly, commencing on the 17th of each month.

Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.

4. As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtain and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.

5. No service charges were identified as part of or separately from the rent.

6. The Tenant stated in his application form that the Apartment was fully furnished.

Liability for Council Tax

7. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax.

Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.

8. No other particular tenancy terms were taken into consideration.

Inspection/Hearing

9. Neither party requested an oral hearing. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.

3

The Property

10. No inspection took place.

11. The parties declined an inspection and the only photographs provided are to show the water staining on the ceiling.

12. The Property is a fully furnished third floor studio apartment with a bathroom (from Application).

13. The Property is situated in Liverpool city centre.

Evidence

14. The Tribunal considered the evidence from the Applicant in relation to the following: i. alleged water ingress which he stated “appears to have been previously accessed or repaired”. No evidence is provided to suggest that there was ongoing water ingress or that the latter incident had not been repaired. The Applicant states only that the issue has not been resolved in a “timely or permanent manner”. ii. That one of tow lifts had been out of service for a considerable period of time.

Determination and Valuation

15. The Tribunal used its general knowledge of Market Rents in the vicinity as well as the comparative evidence provided and decides that the Market Rent of the subject property is £675 per calendar month.

16. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made no adjustments in relation to the following:

a) The Tribunal has not been able to consider the condition of the Property is fair but the allegations of water ingress and the lift that was not operative were considered.

The full valuation is shown below:

Starting Rent

£675 pcm

Less a) Items given under a) above

£0

4

Market rent

£675.00 pcm

Undue hardship

12. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. In cases of undue hardship, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to the date a Tribunal makes its determination.

13. The Tenant has not asked the Tribunal to fix a later starting date in this case.

Decision

14. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £675 per calendar month with effect from 17 January 2026.

APPEAL PROVISIONS

If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent set at the market rate as determined by a First-tier Tribunal.
  • The rent increase must not cause undue hardship.
  • The determination of rent must consider the condition of the property and any contributions made by the tenant.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The rent must be set at a fair market value as determined by relevant comparables and expert knowledge of rental values in the area.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the market rent for an assured tenancy at £675 pcm.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved, with no representatives present.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal used comparative evidence and local knowledge to determine the market rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Housing Act 1988 sections 13 & 14 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

Comparative evidence showing similar rental prices in the area was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than proposed by the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing a rent increase can apply to the Tribunal if they believe the proposed rent is not market-based.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparative rental prices and local knowledge of market rates were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party may appeal on a point of law to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.