VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the market rent for a property, taking into account the improvements made by the tenant. The rent was set at £1072.50 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the property's condition and improvements made by the tenant.

Topics

rent determinationtenant improvementsmarket rent

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent based on the property's condition and any improvements made by the tenant. However, certain factors are disregarded when determining the rent, such as the effect of granting a tenancy to a sitting tenant, increases in property value due to improvements made by the tenant, and decreases in property value due to the tenant's non-compliance with tenancy terms.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal determined the market rent for a property based on its current condition and improvements made by the tenant.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for a property based on its current condition and improvements made by the tenant, setting the rent at £1072.50 per calendar month.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BK/MNR/2023/0059

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Judge H [NAME] [NAME]

[COMPANY], St. [ADDRESS], Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne And Wear, [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] & Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1072.50 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 August 2023

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable N/A Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced October 1992

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly Periodic

7. Allocation of liability for repairs S.11 – Landlord & Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None.

9. Description of premises 4th Floor flat with no lift, 3 Bedrooms, reception, kitchen & shower room/WC.

Chairman Judge H [NAME] of Decision 01 August 2023

Case reference : LON/00BK/MNR/2023/0059 Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] Respondent : [redacted] : Section 13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal member(s) : Judge H [NAME] [NAME] and venue of determination : [ADDRESS] of reasons : 2nd October 2023

REASONS (HOUSING ACT 1988)

Decision of the tribunal (1) The Tribunal determines that the rent that the property in its current condition might reasonably be expected to achieve in the open market under an assured tenancy is £ 1072.50 per calendar month. FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Background 1. The property is let on a monthly periodic assured tenancy. The tenancy commenced in October 1992.

2. On the 13th December 2022 the landlord served a notice under s.13 of the Housing Act 1988 raising the rent with effect from 29th January 2023 to £1,040.91 per calendar month.

3. By an [NAME] dated 24TH January 2023 the tenant referred that notice to the tribunal challenging the increase and seeking a determination of the market rent.

4. A hearing was held in [ADDRESS] on 21st July 2023 and attended by Ms [RESPONDENT]. There was no attendance from the landlord. Submissions 5. On the [NAME] form the tenants stated that the property was a shell when they moved in. They enclosed a written statement of the work that they had carried out. This included flooring the property as on moving in the floor comprised uneven concrete, replacing light fittings ad wall switches, repairing bedroom ceilings, boxing in the meter as well as installing kitchen and bathroom. At the hearing Ms [NAME] told the tribunal that when they originally took the tenancy of the property from the Church Commissioners there were very limited provision of facilities, that the property was a total mess and not safe for their family. The tenants enclosed photographs of the original condition.

6. The tenants in substance reproduced their previous applications. No evidence to the contrary has been provided by the landlord.

7. The tenants also said that there is mould to the bathroom which requires constant attention.

8. The tenants also raised the issue of the landlord changing the due rent date from the 1st of the month to the 29th of the month. Inspection 9. The tribunal inspected the property on 21st July 2023 in the presence of the tenant and the landlord. It found the property to be a fourth floor self-contained flat in a purpose built block of flats built around the turn of the 20th century. The flat was approached by an internal staircase.

10. The block was situated in an estate of similar- aged property. The roof of the block was unsighted.

11. The accommodation comprises: • A shower room/ WC. • Kitchen. • A reception room • Three small bedrooms • A small balcony

12. The property has the benefit of central heating which was installed by the landlord.

13. The property is situated in a very convenient position with good transport links and easy access to shops and schools. The Law 14. The rules governing a determination of market rent are set out in section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. In particular, the tribunal is to determine the rent for each flat at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy, subject to disregards in relation to the nature of the tenancy (i.e. it being granted to a “sitting tenant”) and any increase or reduction in the value due to the tenant’s improvements or failure to comply with the terms of the tenancy. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the tribunal has proceeded on the basis that the landlord is responsible for repairs to the structure, exterior and any installations pursuant to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the tenant for interior decoration.

15. The tribunal notes the change in rent payment date, but on checking the terms of the tenancy it appears that the tenancy commenced on the 29th of the month, but with a rent payment date of the 1st of the month. It appears to the tribunal that the landlord has adjusted the rental payment date to the commencement of the rental period of the tenancy. The valuation 16. Having carefully considered all the available evidence, the Tribunal considers that the rent that would be achieved in good condition with modern

amenities would be £1650 pcm. Although comparable evidence was higher, the property was small for a three bedroomed flat, and the lack of a lift impacts upon its market value. 17. £1650 is the rent that would be achieved if the property was let in good condition with all modern amenities. However the tenants have installed nearly all of the amenities in the property It therefore determined a deduction of 35% overall. Based upon these findings from the inspection the tribunal considers that the market rent for the property in its current condition is £ 1072.50 per calendar month.

18. The Tribunal received no evidence of hardship and, therefore, the rent determined by the tribunal is to take effect from the date proposed by the respondent, i.e. 1st August 2023.

Name: Judge H [NAME]: 2nd October 2023

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the [NAME] within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant made improvements to the property.
  • The property's condition was considered in the rent adjustment.
  • Expert valuations were used to determine the rent adjustment.
  • Necessary improvements were made by the tenant.
  • The tribunal had jurisdiction over the application.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord's notice under section 13 was defective.
  • The application did not meet the statutory requirements.
  • The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction over the application.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The market rent for a property was set at £1072.50 per calendar month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's current condition and the improvements made by the tenant.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the impact of the tenant's improvements on the property's value.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the improvements they've made to their property when disputing rent increases.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs of the original condition of the property and a written statement detailing the tenant's improvements mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.