VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £1550, which excludes water rates and council tax but includes service charges. The decision became effective on June 12, 2023.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent determination under the Housing Act 1988 Section 14.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988 Section 14, a tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also apply to challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). The tribunal will then determine the rent at which the dwelling house might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988 Section 14. The rent was set at £1550 per calendar month, excluding water rates and council tax but including service charges. The decision took effect on 12 June 2023.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BG/MNR/2023/0261

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT] 13 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1550.00 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 12 June 2023

*3. The amount included for services is/is

not applicable - Per -

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 12 April 2021

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 LTA 1985 applies

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord White goods (fridge freezer,oven hob extractor, washer dryer) dining table and chairs, wardrobe and chest of drawers to bedroom, curtains to bedroom.

9. Description of premises One bedroom partly furnished first floor flat with balcony. Comprising bedroom, living room, dining room, open plan kitchen, and shower room with central heating. Property accessed via a lift from the communal parts.

[NAME] of Decision 3 November 2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed12 cases

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the rent for the property to be £1550.00 per calendar month.
  • The decision on the rent determination took effect on 12 June 2023.
  • The tenancy was an assured periodic tenancy that began on 12 April 2021.
  • The landlord provided white goods, dining furniture, bedroom furniture, and curtains.
  • The property is a one-bedroom, partly furnished first-floor flat with a balcony, central heating, and lift access.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, setting the rent at £1550 per month.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the calculation of the rent amount under the Housing Act.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should refer to the Housing Act 1988 for determining their rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence regarding the property's condition and market value likely influenced the decision.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.