VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. This means the rent for the property was set according to the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a register of rents under an assured periodic tenancy.

Topics

tenancy agreementrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

Decision on rent determination for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The decision took into account the terms of the tenancy agreement and the relevant statutory provisions.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/44UD/MNR/2020/0059

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 7b St. [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]

Landlord Complete Lettings (T/A [RESPONDENT]) [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Miss [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £450.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 January 2021

3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 October 2014

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 LTA 1985

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Not applicable – None

8. Description of premises Second floor 1 bedroom flat comprising open plan lounge/kitchen + shared laundry

[NAME] of Decision 26 February 2021

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed12 cases

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a rent determination under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant is entitled to a reduced rent if the property is in poor condition.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property under an assured periodic tenancy.
  • The tenant is entitled to a reduced rent if the property is in disrepair and not compliant with local authority standards.
  • The tenant is entitled to a register of rents under an assured periodic tenancy as per the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the terms of the tenancy agreement and the Housing Act 1988.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument about the terms of the tenancy agreement was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should refer to the Housing Act 1988 for guidance on rent determination.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The tenancy agreement and the relevant statutory provisions were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.