VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Grants Conditional Dispensation for Urgent Fire Safety Works

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal allowed a landlord to skip consulting leaseholders about major fire safety works because the works were urgent and necessary for safety and compliance with an enforcement notice.

⚖️ Legal holding

A landlord may be granted dispensation from consulting leaseholders about major works if the works are urgent and necessary for safety and compliance with enforcement notices.

Topics

fire safetyconsultation requirementsurgent works

Provisions

Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

📖 What the law says

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.20ZA

This section allows a tribunal to grant dispensation from consultation requirements related to certain works or long-term agreements if it is deemed reasonable to do so. It defines 'qualifying works' as works on a building or premises and 'qualifying long term agreement' as an agreement lasting over twelve months. The 'consultation requirements' refer to rules set by the Secretary of State, which can include providing details of proposed works to tenants, obtaining estimates, and considering tenants' observations.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal granted conditional dispensation to dispense with the consultation requirements for urgent fire safety works.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal granted conditional dispensation to a landlord to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, allowing urgent fire safety works to proceed under Section 20ZA of the same Act.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference

:

CHI/00HB/LDC/2021/0042

Property

:

[APPELLANT], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

:

[NAME]

Respondent: [redacted]

:

---

Type of Application

:

To dispense with the requirement to consult lessees about major works section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

Tribunal Member

:

Judge Dovar

Date of Determination

:

9th June 2021

DETERMINATION

2 Background

1. The Applicant seeks dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements imposed on the landlord by Section 20 of the 1985 Act.

2. The Applicant explains that the fire alarm system at the building has been assessed as not complying with fire safety regulations namely and that remedial works are recommended to be carried out in line with MCHLG advice for building owners of multi Storey multi occupied residential buildings.

3. Following an inspection in February 2021, it was recommended that until such time as the necessary remedial works were carried out a new fire alarm system should be installed. That would also avoid the need for ongoing waking watch to be in place.

4. Further the fire alarm system needs to be installed to comply an enforcement notice issued by the Avon Fire and Rescue service which was required to be complied by the 9th of April 2021.

5. It is therefore important for fire safety reasons for the safety of the [RESPONDENT] at the property and will save money on ongoing waking watch.

6. In the circumstances the applicant decided that the works to install the system need to proceed as a matter of urgency both ensure the safety of the residents and to ensure compliance with the enforcement notice.

7. The only issue for the Tribunal is whether or not it is reasonable to dispense with the statutory consultation requirements. This application does not concern the issue of whether any service charge costs will be reasonable or payable.

DIRECTIONS

8. Having considered the application the Tribunal was satisfied that the matter is urgent, it is not practicable for there to be a hearing and that it was in the interests of justice to make a decision disposing of the proceedings without a hearing (rule 6A of the Tribunal Procedure Rules 2013 as amended by The Tribunal Procedure (Coronavirus) Amendment Rules 2020 SI 2020 No 406 L11.

9. Directions were given, including a notice that the Tribunal intended to deal with the matter on the papers and inviting responses from [RESPONDENT]. Following that, one [RESPONDENT] wrote to the Tribunal confirming their consent to the application. There were no objections and no request for a hearing.

3 DETERMINATION

10.

In the circumstances, in light of the urgency and the lack of objection, the Tribunal grants conditional dispensation.

11. The conditions are that the Applicant is to:

• provide a copy of this determination to each [NAME]; and • a written explanation as to how they have located the contractor used to instal the fire alarm system and what other contractors they considered; and • at the request of any [NAME] (to be made within 14 days of receipt of this determination), provide them with a copy of any estimate or invoice relating to the said works.

12. Once those conditions are fulfilled, the requirements of the statutory consultation will be waived. JUDGE DOVAR

4 Appeals

A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The works are urgent and necessary for safety.
  • The works comply with enforcement notices.
  • The landlord is entitled to dispensation from consulting leaseholders if the works are necessary and urgent.
  • A landlord may be allowed dispensation from consultation requirements if it is reasonable to do so, even if the works were not initially covered by the consultation.
  • A tenant is entitled to a rent reduction reflecting the poor condition of the property.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided to grant conditional dispensation to a landlord to skip consulting leaseholders about major fire safety works.

Who was involved?

A landlord and leaseholders were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to grant conditional dispensation because the works were urgent and necessary for safety and compliance with an enforcement notice.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 20ZA and Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the urgency and necessity of the fire safety works for safety and compliance with an enforcement notice.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might also be able to get dispensation from consulting leaseholders if their works are urgent and necessary for safety and compliance with an enforcement notice.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of the urgency and necessity of the works for safety and compliance with an enforcement notice mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

Yes, it is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.