First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Fire Safety Measures
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal allowed a landlord to bypass certain consultation requirements under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 because the fire safety measures were necessary to ensure the safety of the tenants.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord may be dispensed from consultation requirements if it is reasonable to do so to prevent danger to tenants.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for fire safety measures at a residential property in Covent Garden.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Tribunal reference :
LON/00BK/LDC/2025/0628
Property :
30 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Mr [COUNSEL] of [APPELLANT] Respondents
Various lessees Representative :
Type of [NAME]:
Dispensation from consultation requirements Tribunal members :
Venue : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Date of decision : 01 April 2025
DECISION
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
1. This is an [NAME] made by Mr [NAME]. [NAME] of [APPELLANT] (“the managing agents”) on behalf of the Applicant, its client.
2. The [NAME] is for dispensation from the consultation requirements of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (“the 1985 Act”), pursuant to s.27ZA of the 1985 Act.
3. Section 20ZA(1) provides that: "Where an [NAME] is made to [the FTT] for a determination to dispense with all or any of the consultation requirements in relation to any qualifying works …, the tribunal may make the determination if satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the requirements." 4. 30 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] is a purpose built 1980’s block of 12 flats situated in [ADDRESS] (“the building”).
5. Directions were given on 05 February 2025.
6. This [NAME] concerns (a) the fire alarm panel and (b) emergency lighting at the building.
7. They failed their bi-annual tests carried out by [NAME] [COMPANY] (“[NAME]”). On fire alarm panel and 44 emergency lights have been replaced.
8. The work has already been carried out as being necessary to prevent danger to the occupants of the building.
9. There has been no objection to the [NAME] for dispensation.
10. I am satisfied that it is reasonable to grant dispensation.
11. I note that there is an allegation by leaseholders that the works, which were carried out by [NAME] by the choice and arrangement of the managing agents, were unreasonably expensive.
12. This decision only relates to dispensation, not to the reasonableness of the work done or its costs. These can be challenged before the FTT if necessary in separate proceedings.
Name: Judge Brilliant
Date: 01 April 2025
Rights of appeal
A written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case.
The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.
The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Found in Breach of Multiple Lease Covenants
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Secures Right to Manage Despite Uncooperative Landlord
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) RTM Company Granted Right to Manage Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Ground Floor Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) RTM Company Granted Dispensation for Urgent Electrical Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Claimant Successfully Acquires Right to Manage Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- Urgent works are necessary to address immediate dangers to tenants.
- The landlord seeks dispensation under s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
- The works are essential to prevent imminent harm.
- The landlord demonstrates compliance with statutory requirements.
- There is no substantial alternative to the proposed works.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided to grant dispensation from consultation requirements for fire safety measures.
Who was involved?
The landlord and various lessees were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant dispensation because the fire safety measures were necessary to prevent danger to the tenants.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, specifically section 27ZA, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the fire safety measures were necessary to ensure the safety of the tenants.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be able to obtain dispensation from consultation requirements if they can show that the measures are necessary to prevent danger to tenants.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence that the fire alarm panel and emergency lighting had failed their bi-annual tests and needed replacement to ensure safety was presented.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) if permission is granted.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving legal matters such as this.
