First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Lift Repairs
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal allowed a landlord to bypass certain consultation requirements because of urgent lift repairs. This decision ensures tenant safety while acknowledging the need for prompt action.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord may be dispensed from consultation requirements if there is no prejudice to tenants and the work is urgent.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements due to urgent lift repairs.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for urgent lift repairs in a high-rise building. The decision was based on the lack of prejudice to tenants and the urgency of the work.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Tribunal reference :
LON/00BK/LDC/2025/0791 Property :
[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
[COMPANY] :
[COMPANY] Respondents
Various lessees Representative :
Type of application:
Dispensation from consultation requirements
Tribunal members :
Venue : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Date of decision : 03 September 2025
DECISION © CROWN COPYRIGHT
1. This application is for dispensation from the consultation requirements of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (“the 1985 Act”), pursuant to s.27ZA of the 1985 Act.
2. Section 20ZA(1) provides that: "Where an application is made to [the FTT] for a determination to dispense with all or any of the consultation requirements in relation to any qualifying works …, the tribunal may make the determination if satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the requirements."
3. The property is high rise and predominately residential with a commercial unit on the ground floor. Floors 1, 2 and 3 consist of 10 units that have their own ground floor communal entrance. Floors 4 and above consist of 28 units that have a separate ground floor communal entrance. The concierge is located in the reception lobby for units 11 to 38. All floors share the same escape stairway.
4. There is one lift for the property. At the time of the application, 18 June 2025, the lift had been down for five weeks.
5. Directions were given on 22 July 2025. Any lessees who opposed the application were directed to inform the Tribunal by 08 August 2025. There are no such objections.
6. On 20 June 2025, the managing agents wrote to the tenants that explaining the position and that it would not be possible to comply with the dispensation requirements as the work was so urgent. A quote had been obtained from [NAME] in the sum of £13,500 including VAT. None of the other contractors approached was interested in the work.
7. The leading authority on applications for dispensation is the Supreme Court’s decision in [COMPANY] v Benson [2013] UKSC 14; [2013] HLR 2.
8. In that case the Supreme Court held that the main, indeed normally, the sole question for the Tribunal when considering how to exercise its jurisdiction in accordance with s.20ZA(1) is the real prejudice to the tenants flowing from the landlord’s breach of the consultation requirements. The financial consequences for the landlord of not granting a dispensation is not a relevant factor. The Tribunal may grant dispensation on such conditions as it thinks fit: provided that any such conditions are appropriate in their nature and their effect.
9. There is no evidence before me of any prejudice and I am satisfied that it is reasonable to grant dispensation.
10. This decision only relates to dispensation, not to the reasonableness of the work done or its costs. These can be challenged before the FTT if necessary in separate proceedings.
Name: Judge Brilliant
Date: 03 September 2025
Rights of appeal
A written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case.
The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.
If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.
The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 10 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Fire Safety Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs Without Consulting Le…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Financial Penalty to £500
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Allows Freeholder to Vary Leases for Sinking Fund and I…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Remedial Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The works are urgent and necessary.
- There is no real prejudice to tenants.
- The leaseholders have not objected.
- The landlord is entitled to dispensation under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
- Urgent repairs are necessary to address a specific issue.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal allowed the landlord to bypass consultation requirements for urgent lift repairs.
Who was involved?
The landlord and various tenants were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant dispensation because the work was urgent and there was no evidence of prejudice to tenants.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, specifically section 27ZA, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that the work was urgent and there was no prejudice to tenants was crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation might also be able to bypass consultation requirements if the work is urgent and there is no prejudice to tenants.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the urgency of the lift repairs and the lack of prejudice to tenants mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for specific cases.
