First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal allowed the landlord to carry out urgent roof repairs without consulting the a person because the repairs were deemed necessary to prevent water damage and protect the health of the residents.
⚖️ Legal holding
An applicant can obtain dispensation for urgent works if there are no objections and no prejudice to the tenants.
📖 What the law says
This section outlines the conditions under which a tribunal can grant permission to bypass consultation requirements for certain works or long-term agreements. Specifically, the tribunal may grant this permission if it determines that it is reasonable to do so, provided there are no objections and no prejudice to the tenants.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal granted dispensation for urgent roof repairs under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal granted dispensation to the applicant for urgent roof repairs under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, finding no objections or prejudice to the tenants.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case reference : LON/00AG/LDC/2025/0665 Property : 55 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : [APPELLANT] Respondents : [redacted] :
N/A Type of [NAME] : [NAME] for dispensation to consult – section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Tribunal : Judge Tagliavini Date of decision : 5 August 2025
____ ____________________
DECISION
2
The tribunal’s summary decision
(1.) The tribunal grants dispensation pursuant to s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) in respect of work to:
(a) Repair and replace roof tiles.
(b) Remedy works to slope roof.
(c) Party wall bricks repair and removal with new lead.
(d) Any necessary repair works to the front and rear slated pitches.
(e) Work to include all repairs relating to timbers, battens, cross
battens, slates etc.
At the estimated cost of the works of £4,600+VAT
_________________________________________________________
The [NAME]
1. This is an [NAME] made pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) seeking dispensation for the consultation requirements in respect of the works required to the roof and associated repairs in order to prevent water ingress.
Background
2. The property at 55 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] comprises a block of 5 residential flats and a commercial unit. The leases for the flats require the landlord to maintain the structure of the building including the roof, the cost of which the lessees are required to contribute by way of service charge.
3. The [NAME] is said to be urgent because the building has had an ongoing roof leak from the rear mansard, and damp patches due to adverse weather conditions, which is causing mould patches to develop internally, which are said to be detrimental to the health of the residents. The leaks are also said to be affecting the integrity of the structure.
4. The [NAME] has uploaded on its [NAME] the notice of intent for the new works required on 28 February 2025 and sent the postal version on 03 March 2025. It has also had various meeting with [NAME] affected informing them of the plans.
3
5. In its directions the respondents were required by the tribunal to provide any objections to this [NAME] by 26 June 2025. However, no response/objections have been received by the tribunal from the respondents.
The hearing
6. The [NAME] was determined by the tribunal on the papers comprising a digital bundle of 94 pages as no party requested an oral hearing. In [NAME] its decision the tribunal took into account the information provided by the applicant by way of a bundle comprising 16 pages in addition to the [NAME] and the accompanying documents. No documentation was received from any of the respondents.
The tribunal’s decision and reasons
7. The tribunal grants dispensation pursuant to s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) in respect of the intended works to:
(a) Repair and replace roof tiles.
(b) Remedy works to slope roof.
(c) Party wall bricks repair and removal with new lead.
battens, slates etc.
At the estimated cost of the works of £4,600+VAT
8. The tribunal has had regard to the urgent nature of the works and the absence of any objection by any respondent to this [NAME] or the proposed works. The tribunal has also considered the absence of prejudice caused by the lack of consultation pursuant to section 20 of the985 Act in respect of both sets of works for which the applicant seeks dispensation. Therefore, in the circumstances the tribunal considers it reasonable and proportionate to grant the [NAME] sought; [COMPANY] v Benson and others [2013] UKSC 14.
Name: Judge Tagliavini
Date: 5 August 2025
4
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.
If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp- pta-[NAME]-for-permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands- chamber
The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.
The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.
If the Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Fire Alarm Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs Without Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Permission to Carry Out Necessary Works Without Leaseholde…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: Tenant Wins Reduced Rent
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Pipe Replacement Works
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The works are urgent and essential for safety reasons.
- There are no objections from tenants.
- No prejudice is caused to the tenants.
- The works are necessary and there is no substantial interference with the tenants' rights.
- Service charges are limited to reasonable costs under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- A fair rent must be determined by considering the market rent, adjusted for scarcity and other relevant factors.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided to grant dispensation to the landlord for urgent roof repairs.
Who was involved?
The landlord and the leaseholders of a block of flats and a commercial unit.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant dispensation because the repairs were urgent and necessary to prevent water damage and protect the health of the residents.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The urgency of the repairs and the absence of objections from the leaseholders were the most important arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be able to obtain dispensation for urgent repairs if there are no objections and no prejudice to the tenants.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the urgency of the repairs and the absence of objections from the leaseholders mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
