First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2013

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AH/LDC/2022/0067 Property : 29 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] represented by [NAME] : (1) Mr and Mrs [NAME] (2) Mr and Ms [NAME] of [NAME] :

Dispensation from consultation requirements under Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 section 20ZA Tribunal Members :

Judge Professor R Percival

Venue : Remote paper determination Date of Decision : 12 September 2023

DECISION

2

Decisions of the tribunal (1) The Tribunal, pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (“the 1985 Act”), grants dispensation from the consultation requirements in respect of the works the subject of the [NAME]. Procedural 1. The landlord submitted an [NAME] for dispensation from the consultation requirements in section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (“the 1985 Act”) and the regulations thereunder, dated 8 March 2022.

2. The Tribunal gave directions on 10 July 2023. The directions provided for a form to be distributed to those who pay the service charge to allow them to object to or agree with the [NAME], and, if objecting, to provide such further material as they sought to rely on. The [NAME] and directions was required to be sent to the [NAME] and any sublessees, and to be displayed as a notice in the common parts of the property. The deadline for return of the forms, to the Applicant and the Tribunal, was 1 August 2023.

3. No response from any of the [NAME] has been received by the Tribunal. The property and the works 4. The property is described as a mid-terrace 1930s house converted into two flats.

5. The [NAME] relates to roof works.

6. Following a report (on 15 September 2021) of a leak from one of the tenants, the roof was inspected. The [NAME] found that work was required to replace slipped tiles, to repair and repoint the valley, and to repair dental fillets. Scaffolding was required.

7. The total cost of the work was £1,585.

8. The Applicant wrote to the [NAME] later in September 2021, setting out the work, giving the figure for the cost and explaining that they would make the [NAME].

3 Determination 9. The relevant statutory provisions are sections 20 and 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1983, and the Service Charges (Consultation etc)(England) Regulations 2003. They may be consulted at the following URLs respectively: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/[NAME]/ 1985/70 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/[NAME]/2003/1987/contents/made 10. The Tribunal is concerned solely with an [NAME] under section 20ZA of the 1985 Act to dispense with the consultation requirements under section 20 and the regulations.

11. I accept that the leak, which I assume to have caused water ingress into one of the tenant’s flats, meant that it was appropriate for the Applicant to undertake the repairs quickly. That alone justifies dispensation.

12. In any event, no response been received from any of the [NAME] objecting to the [NAME]. It is therefore clear that the [NAME] have not sought to claim any prejudice as a result of the consultation requirements not having been satisfied. Where that is the case, the Tribunal must, quite apart from any question of urgency, allow the [NAME]: [COMPANY] v [NAME] and others [2013] UKSC 14; [2013] 1 WLR 854.

13. This [NAME] relates solely to the granting of dispensation. If the [NAME] consider the cost of the works to be excessive or the quality of the workmanship poor, or if costs sought to be recovered through the service charge are otherwise not reasonably incurred, then it is open to them to apply to the Tribunal for a determination of those issues under section 27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. Rights of appeal 14. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the London regional office.

15. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].

16. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, the [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at these reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME]

4 for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit. 17. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, give the date, the property and the case number; state the grounds of appeal; and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.

Name: Judge Prof Richard Percival Date: 12 September 2023