First-tier Tribunal Grants Unconditional Dispensation for Urgent Water Main Repairs
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal granted permission to a landlord to carry out urgent repairs to a water main without consulting the tenants first. The repairs were deemed necessary due to a severe leak and burst water pipe.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord is entitled to dispensation from statutory consultation requirements if the works are urgent and necessary.
📖 What the law says
This section allows a tribunal to grant dispensation from statutory consultation requirements if it deems it reasonable to do so. It defines 'qualifying works' as works on a building or premises and outlines the consultation requirements that can be dispensed with.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal granted unconditional dispensation to the landlord for repairs to a water main without statutory consultation.
📜 Headnote Official document
The landlord sought dispensation from statutory consultation requirements for urgent repairs to a water main. The Tribunal granted unconditional dispensation, finding the works were necessary and no prejudice was suffered by the tenants.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AY/LDC/2021/0294 Landlord /Applicant : [redacted] Borough of Lambeth Representative : [COUNSEL] Tenants/ Respondents : [redacted] on the attached Schedule
Representatives : None Property :
1-104 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tribunal :
Mr [NAME] Mrs [NAME] of Decision : 17 June 2022
DECISION
Covid-19 pandemic: description of determination This has been a remote determination. The form of remote determination was P: PAPERREMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable, no-one requested the same, and all matters could be determined on the papers. The documents that the Tribunal were referred to are in several bundles, the contents of which the Tribunal has noted.
2
Decision 1. Dispensation in respect of the following items is granted unconditionally: a. Investigations in relation to a severe leak and burst water pipe on the mains supply to the property £6,647; b. Cost for the temporary repair/replacement works £31,418; c. Costs for the permanent mains re-run renewal £26,513.33; VAT is to be added in respect of the above items a, b and c where applicable. Reasons The Applicants’ Case 2. The landlord/applicant has applied for dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements in respect of repairs to a water main serving the building, leading to the riser at the property. A temporary repair was initially carried out to stop the high loss of water volume. A permanent repair was completed on 17 May 2021.
3. On 9 December 2020 the Applicant was notified of a leak and an investigation was carried out. This revealed a severe leak and burst on a mains water supply pipe leading to a riser. Work orders were raised as follows: a. Investigations in relation to a severe leak and burst water pipe on the mains supply to the property £6,647 b. Cost for the temporary repair/replacement works £31,418 c. Costs for the permanent mains re-run renewal £26,513.33 d. VAT in respect of the above items a, b and c where applicable.
4. On 13 January 2021 a justification report was produced. The justification was that the defect was severe and required a temporary repair to prevent a high loss of water volume. A permanent solution was also required as the pipework was old and very brittle. The works were completed 17 May 2021.
5. The Council took reasonable steps to inform the Respondents, providing informal notice, albeit the response period was briefer than as provided under the consultation regulations. No observations have been received either before or after completion of these works.
3 6. [COMPANY] v Benson [2013] UKSC 14 as the Respondents have suffered no prejudice and unconditional dispensation should be granted. The Tenants/Respondents’ case 7. None of the tenants/respondents responded to the [NAME]. The Law 8. Section 20ZA is set out in the appendix to this decision. The Tribunal has discretion to grant dispensation when it considers it reasonable to do so. In addition, the Supreme Court Judgment in [COMPANY] v Benson and Others [2013] UKSC 14 empowers the Tribunal to grant dispensation on terms or subject to conditions. Findings 9. The Tribunal finds that the applicant has acted reasonably in dealing with this urgent disrepair and it notes that that none of the tenants have objected to the [NAME]. Therefore dispensation under section 20ZA is granted unconditionally in respect of the consultation requirements for these works.
10. However, this decision has no bearing on the question of the reasonableness of costs to be incurred or their payability. The Tribunal makes no findings in relation to those matters.
C Norman FRICS
Valuer Chairman
17 June 2022
Schedule of Respondents
[...]
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
• The Tribunal is required to set out rights of appeal against its decisions by virtue of the rule 36 (2)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(Property Chamber) Rules 2013 and these are set out below.
• If a party wishes to appeal against this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be
4 made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
• The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
• If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
• The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property, and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.
Appendix
Section 20ZA Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (1)Where an [NAME] is made to [the appropriate Tribunal] for a determination to dispense with all or any of the consultation requirements in relation to any qualifying works or qualifying long term agreement, the Tribunal may make the determination if satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the requirements. (2)In section 20 and this section— “qualifying works” means works on a building or any other premises, and “qualifying long term agreement” means (subject to subsection (3)) an agreement entered into, by or on behalf of the landlord or a superior landlord, for a term of more than twelve months. (3)The Secretary of State may by regulations provide that an agreement is not a qualifying long term agreement— (a)if it is an agreement of a description prescribed by the regulations, or (b)in any circumstances so prescribed. (4)In section 20 and this section “the consultation requirements” means requirements prescribed by regulations made by the Secretary of State.
5 (5)Regulations under subsection (4) may in particular include provision requiring the landlord— (a)to provide details of proposed works or agreements to tenants or the recognised tenants’ association representing them, (b)to obtain estimates for proposed works or agreements, (c)to invite tenants or the recognised tenants’ association to propose the names of persons from whom the landlord should try to obtain other estimates, (d)to have regard to observations made by tenants or the recognised tenants’ association in relation to proposed works or agreements and estimates, and (e)to give reasons in prescribed circumstances for carrying out works or entering into agreements. (6)Regulations under section 20 or this section— (a)may make provision generally or only in relation to specific cases, and (b)may make different provision for different purposes. (7)Regulations under section 20 or this section shall be made by statutory instrument which shall be subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.
6
LEASEHOLDERS OF 1- 104 WIMBORNE HOUSE, DORSET ROAD, [POSTCODE] LIST OF RESPONDENTS
[NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] MR [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]. [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] MR [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [COMPANY] [NAME]. ALISA B. [NAME] [NAME] MISS [NAME] [COMPANY] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Repairs Due to Failed Water Supply
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Exemption for Urgent Repairs Without Tenant Consent
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Urgent Repairs Dispensation in First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Urgent Repairs Dispensation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Unconditional Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Reasonable Tenant Costs Under Leasehold Refo…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Permission for Emergency Repairs Without Tenant Consent
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Dispensation Granted for Urgent Works Without Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord acted reasonably in dealing with the urgent repair work.
- The tenants did not object to the dispensation request.
- There was a severe leak and burst water pipe that needed investigation and repair.
- A temporary repair was needed to prevent a high loss of water volume.
- A permanent solution was necessary because the pipework was old and brittle.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided to grant unconditional dispensation to the landlord for repairs to a water main without statutory consultation.
Who was involved?
The landlord and leaseholders at a residential property were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant dispensation because the repairs were urgent and necessary, and no prejudice was suffered by the tenants.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, specifically Section 20ZA, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the repairs were urgent and necessary, and the tenants had not suffered any prejudice.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be able to seek dispensation from statutory consultation requirements if the repairs are urgent and necessary.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the severity of the leak and burst water pipe, along with the cost of the repairs, was considered important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days of receiving the written reasons.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
