Landlord Granted Urgent Repairs Dispensation in First-tier Tribunal
📌 In brief
In this case, the First-tier Tribunal granted the landlord permission to skip certain consultation steps because of urgent repairs needed to prevent water damage. The decision was made based on the urgency of the repairs and the fact that none of the tenants objected.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord is entitled to dispensation from consultation requirements if urgent repairs are necessary and reasonable.
📖 What the law says
The appropriate tribunal can grant a request to waive consultation requirements if it finds it reasonable to do so. Consultation requirements refer to rules set by the Secretary of State regarding providing details of proposed works or agreements to tenants, obtaining estimates, inviting tenant suggestions, considering tenant observations, and giving reasons for certain actions.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal granted dispensation for the landlord to bypass consultation requirements due to urgent disrepair.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal granted dispensation for the landlord to bypass consultation requirements due to urgent disrepair. The decision was based on the urgency of the repairs and the lack of objections from the tenants.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AG/LDC/2021/0206 Landlord /Applicant: [redacted] : [APPELLANT] (Ms [COUNSEL]) Tenants/ Respondents : [redacted] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] & Ms [NAME] Mr [NAME] & Ms A [NAME] :
[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tribunal : Mr [NAME] Ms [NAME] of Decision : 11 October 2021
DECISION
Covid-19 pandemic: description of determination This has been a remote determination. The form of remote determination was P: PAPERREMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable, no-one requested the same, and all matters could be determined on the papers. The documents that the Tribunal were referred to are in a bundle of 50 pages, the contents of which the Tribunal has noted. Decision 1. Dispensation in respect of the remaining consultation requirements is GRANTED unconditionally.
2 Reasons Background to the [NAME] (1) The landlord/applicant has applied for dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements in respect of external repairs comprising: • Full height tower external scaffolding • Realign gutter to RHS building • Pointing repairs • Fill visible holes around boiler flue pipes to front elevation • Apply clear capillary sealant to brickwork • Remove debris
(2) Directions were issued on 17 August 2021. (3) The Tribunal identified the property from [ADDRESS] view and notes that it is a substantial mid terrace Victorian townhouse. It notes from the [NAME] that this has been divided into four flats. (4) A stage 1 section 20 Notice of Intention was issued. (5) The [NAME] was said to be urgent to prevent further water ingress to the subject and an adjoining building. The Applicants’ Case 2. This was as per paragraphs (1) and (5) above. In addition, a quotation from [NAME] for £1350 plus VAT, dated 22 July 2021 was supplied. This covered all the works referred to. The [NAME] pointed out that the [NAME] had not responded to the [NAME]. The Respondents’ case 3. None of the Respondents responded to the [NAME]. The Law
4. Section 20ZA is set out in the appendix to this decision. The Tribunal has discretion to grant dispensation when it considers it reasonable to do so. In addition, the Supreme Court Judgment in [COMPANY] v [NAME] and Others [2013] UKSC 14 empowers the Tribunal to grant dispensation on terms or subject to conditions.
Findings 5. The Tribunal finds that the applicant/landlord have acted reasonably in dealing with urgent disrepair and it notes that that none of the tenants have objected to the [NAME]. Therefore, the appropriate outcome
3 under section 20ZA is that dispensation is granted unconditionally in respect of stages 2, 3 and 4 of the consultation requirements (estimates, notices about estimates and notification of reasons) in respect of the works set out in the stage 1 notice.
6. However, this decision has no bearing on the question of the reasonableness of costs to be incurred or their payability. The Tribunal makes no findings in relation to those matters.
C Norman FRICS
Valuer Chairman
11 October 2021
Note: the applicant/landlord should ensure that sufficient photographs of the subject property to show its nature should be included in any future applications to the Tribunal under section 20ZA.
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
• The Tribunal is required to set out rights of appeal against its decisions by virtue of the rule 36 (2)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(Property Chamber) Rules 2013 and these are set out below.
• If a party wishes to appeal against this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
• The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
• If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
• The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.
Appendix
4
Section 20ZA Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (1)Where an [NAME] is made to [the appropriate Tribunal] for a determination to dispense with all or any of the consultation requirements in relation to any qualifying works or qualifying long term agreement, the Tribunal may make the determination if satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the requirements. (2)In section 20 and this section— “qualifying works” means works on a building or any other premises, and “qualifying long term agreement” means (subject to subsection (3)) an agreement entered into, by or on behalf of the landlord or a superior landlord, for a term of more than twelve months. (3)The Secretary of State may by regulations provide that an agreement is not a qualifying long term agreement— (a)if it is an agreement of a description prescribed by the regulations, or (b)in any circumstances so prescribed. (4)In section 20 and this section “the consultation requirements” means requirements prescribed by regulations made by the Secretary of State. (5)Regulations under subsection (4) may in particular include provision requiring the landlord— (a)to provide details of proposed works or agreements to tenants or the [COMPANY] representing them, (b)to obtain estimates for proposed works or agreements, (c)to invite tenants or the [COMPANY] to propose the names of persons from whom the landlord should try to obtain other estimates, (d)to have regard to observations made by tenants or the [COMPANY] in relation to proposed works or agreements and estimates, and (e)to give reasons in prescribed circumstances for carrying out works or entering into agreements. (6)Regulations under section 20 or this section— (a)may make provision generally or only in relation to specific cases, and
5 (b)may make different provision for different purposes. (7)Regulations under section 20 or this section shall be made by statutory instrument which shall be subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Urgent Repairs Dispensation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Exemption for Urgent Repairs Without Tenant Consent
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Permission for Urgent Roof Repairs Without Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Permission to Skip Consultation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Unconditional Dispensation for Urgent Water Main…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Repairs Due to Failed Water Supply
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Unconditional Dispensation for Urgent Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Reasonable Tenant Costs Under Leasehold Refo…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord acted reasonably in addressing the urgent disrepair.
- The repairs were necessary to prevent further water ingress into the building.
- A quotation for the works was supplied by a contractor.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The decision allowed the landlord to bypass the consultation requirements for urgent repairs.
Who was involved?
The landlord and the tenants were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant dispensation because the repairs were urgent and none of the tenants objected.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, specifically Section 20ZA, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the urgency of the repairs and the lack of objections from the tenants.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation might also be able to bypass consultation requirements if they can prove the urgency of the repairs.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The quotation for the repair work and the lack of response from the tenants mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
