First-tier Tribunal Grants Urgent Fire Alarm Repairs Without Consultation
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal granted permission for a landlord to bypass the usual consultation process for urgent fire alarm repairs. This was done to quickly address fire risks and ensure tenant safety.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord may be granted dispensation from consultation requirements under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 if there is an urgent fire risk.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, a landlord can apply to a tribunal for permission to skip certain consultation requirements related to building works or long-term agreements if the tribunal finds it reasonable to do so.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements for urgent fire alarm repairs.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal granted dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent fire alarm repairs to ensure tenant safety. The landlord acted reasonably to avoid delays caused by consultation under Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BK/LDC/2025/0709 Property : 2-8 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] Respondent : [redacted] : Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Act - Section 20ZA Tribunal : Judge Adrian Jack
DECISION DETERMINED ON THE PAPERS ON 23RD SEPTEMBER 2025
1. The [NAME] by an [NAME] dated 11th April 2025 has applied for dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements in respect of remedial works for the fire alarm system to address faults. These include new call points, detector bases and replacement device batteries.
2. The property consists of twenty residential flats let on long leases. There are standard provisions for the recovery of service charges. Notice of intention has not been given to the [NAME] and no consultation has been carried out. Dispensation is sought because of the fire risk posed by not having a fully functional alarm system.
3. The Tribunal gave directions on 19th June 2025. These allowed the tenants to make submissions and adduce evidence. In the event, however, the respondent tenants have not engaged with the Tribunal. I am thus determining the [NAME] solely on the basis of the landlord’s evidence.
4. As the directions noted, the only issue for the tribunal to determine is whether it is reasonable to dispense with the statutory consultation
© CROWN COPYRIGHT requirements. The [NAME] does not concern the issue of whether any service charge costs are or will be reasonable or payable.
5. In my judgment this is a quintessential case for the grant of dispensation. The need for a fully functioning fire alarm system is urgent in order to ensure the safety of tenants. The landlord is acting reasonably in wanting to carry out the works without the delay necessarily entailed by the carrying out of a consultation exercise under section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. Accordingly I grant the [NAME].
DECISION Dispensation from the consultation requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is granted pursuant to section 20ZA of the said Act in respect of all the proposed fire alarm remedial works which are the subject of this [NAME].
Name: Judge Adrian Jack Date: 23rd September 2025
© CROWN COPYRIGHT Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 10 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Fire Safety Works Dispensation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Wins Fire Alarm Repair Dispensation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Financial Penalty to £500
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Invalid Rent Increase Notice
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) RTM Company Granted Dispensation for Urgent Electrical Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Challenge Against Invalid Rent Increase Notice
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The works are deemed necessary and urgent.
- There is an urgent need to mitigate a situation.
- The works are necessary to address an urgent fire risk.
- The landlord seeks dispensation for urgent repairs.
- The works do not cause prejudice to the lessees.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided to grant dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent fire alarm repairs.
Who was involved?
The landlord and leaseholders of residential flats were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant the request because ensuring tenant safety from fire risks was urgent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, specifically Section 20ZA, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The urgency of addressing fire risks and ensuring tenant safety was the most important argument.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation might also be able to bypass consultation requirements if there is an urgent fire risk.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The landlord's evidence regarding the urgency of the fire alarm repairs was crucial.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
